Email this site to a contact

 

Another bunch of Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), Association of Residential Managing Agents (ARMA), and ALEP -"regulated" criminals added to the Andrew David Ladsky gang of racketeers - in relation to the Jefferson House 'concentration camp'

MARTYN GERRARD SURVEYORS - and Jefferson House, 11 Basil St, London SW3 1AX

 

(If the linked documents within the PDFs do not open, try with Internet Explorer:

 

If Internet Explorer does not go to a specific part of a page on my website i.e. does not link to an anchor:

In the Internet Explorer browser, select Tools, then 'Compatibility View settings'.

Under 'Add this website' enter: 'leasehold-outrage.com' and click 'Add').

 

SECTIONS

 

People's reaction from looking at this page will depend on which type they are - essentially:

TYPE 1

The landlords' flunkeys, will look at the numbers to determine how much 'I owe', and might even come up with some dreamed-up 'penalties' e.g. as per the script circulated about me at Oct 15.

TYPE 2

Those with a sense of justice, will consider the evidence and arrive at the conclusion that I am owed a very large amount of compensation for being subjected to years of ongoing, extremely traumatic, barbaric, life-destroying, criminal treatment,...

...and will be shocked that those who inflicted this on me are not already in jail, serving substantial prison sentences (as per others who did similar things),...

... as well as barred from ever running a business again.

 

WHICH TYPE ARE YOU?

 

Type 2: this page alone will have told you to:

AVOID RESIDENTIAL LEASEHOLD PROPERTY LIKE THE PLAGUE

 

(Snapshot under Advisors to Jefferson House, 11 Basil St, London SW3 1AX ; see also Extortion)

(NOTE, above, browser set-up)

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Criminal offences

  C O M M E N T S

 

Introduction

 

WARNING LEASEHOLDERS: THE "RICS, ARMA, ALEP et.al. regulated" MARTYN GERRARD ARE CROOKS

Martyn Gerrard took over from the then Martin Russell Jones (MRJ) in 2011, as 'managing agents' for the Jefferson House 'concentration camp'.

 

Its "Bock Management Department" is located in its satan's den, at Martyn Gerrard House, 197 Ballards Lane, Finchley Central, London N3 1LP (photo).

This address is also given for 'The North London Network' - supplied to e.g. the National Association of Estate Agents (NAEA).

On the Companies House website several 'companies' are listed giving the “correspondence address” as ‘The North London Network Ltd’ e.g. Kelcourt Ltd; Oaktree Lodge (Enfield) Ltd.

The key individuals are:

Simon Gerrard PPNAEA (Honoured), MARLA, and

Saul Maurice Gerrard, MA, MRICS, FICBA (see my analysis for the definition of the acronyms).

While a new addition must, of course, fit in with the rest of the Andrew David Ladsky's gang of extremely vicious, cruel, perverse, sadistic, evil, criminal racketeers - ...

I conclude that Jewish Martyn Gerrard appointed itself as henchmen and henchwomen - operating with the full support and assistance of the British state (e.g. below, # 32, 27 May 16) - as 'retribution' for 'my daring' to stand up to its tribe members and the other assassins who actively help them and protect them because, they, 'of course', perceive themselves as 'my victims'.

Hence the reason the Gerrard gang has no worry whatsover about my reporting its criminal activities on my website.

And, of course, my profile makes me an ideal target for this kind of extremely traumatic, barbaric, life-destroying treatment - also demonstrated by what the British state is doing to me.

From the beginning Martyn Gerrard followed in the footsteps of its predecessor, by immediately continuing with the criminal psychological harassment regime:

MAKING FRAUDULENT, UPON FRAUDULENT DEMANDS...

...AND IGNORING CORRESPONDENCE...

...including my 10.02.14 document detailing its actions / lack of action from Feb 11 to that point - as well as consequent breaches of legislation (many amounting to criminal offences), and of my Lease.

Its only response (and that of supporters in the "fantastically corrupt" British state) - has been to dish out an ever growing number of reprisals.

As with its predecessor, Gerrard is doing this on the diktats of Andrew David Ladsky (CKFT-Intro for proof he has been driving activities at Jefferson House - for a long time).

Yet, Ladsky is portrayed by Her Majesty's Kensington & Notting Hill police in illegal so-called "crime reports" it has been processing against me since 2003 and 2007 as:

  • to whom 'I', 'of course', represent 'a risk';

(Note that my objecting to the above (among many others), was described by HM's Queen's Bench judiciary as "[amounting to] a most obvious attempt to re-write history" (QB # 4(6)(1)).

It is the outcome of, among other:

  • the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), falsely portrayed as a so-called "regulator of the profession" (*), actively endorsing criminal activities by its members - by turning a blind eye to irrebutable evidence of fraud, false accounting, extortion, corruption, blackmail, harassment, intimidation, etc. by its members...

(*) While Martyn Gerrard has, since 2012 (# 6, below), added on its letterhead paper the claim that it is "Regulated by the RICS" (as done by the then MRJ, as well as by Brian Gale, MRICS) - the claim is not true.

In an Aug 16 FT article, "Leasehold flats: what estate agents won’t tell you", the RICS was quoted as saying that

"[its] code cannot strike off managing agents or other “unfit persons” responsible for levying unreasonable charges because there is no compulsory register"

And when they are "registered"? = same difference! I repeat my reference to the outcome of my more than legitimate complaint to the RICS against the then MRJ (summary # 6.2)...

- in its 10.06.05 'get lost' letter it stated: "the code is mandatory".

The RICS criminally putting the likes of Martyn Gerrard, Brian Gale and the then Martin Russell Jones (MRJ) in the path of unwary leaseholders is not the only organisation doing this.

Martyn Gerrard's memberships - of which there are frequent changes...

...as well as examples of its awards - for which its submissions make 'fascinating' reading.

This document contains my assessment of both.

In reading this page, note also:

- on Gerrard's letterhead "50 years of fulfilling dreams" (it replaced "The award-winning agency...where integrity counts" (# 7, below);

- how it described itself in its submissions for the awards; and

- by its managing director, Simon Gerrard, MRICS: "...a reputable agent...always looking to improve our customer service" (Estate Agent Today, "Mary Portas programme on agents slammed as a 'circus", 10 Feb 11)

As I have communicated to the Martyn Gerrard mafia in my 10.02.14 document (pg 13, lines 20-22) (# 19, below):

"...you redefine many concepts, among others: racketeering, evilness, perversion, sadism, cruelty, viciousness and victimization."

In fact, based on my religious beliefs, to me, Martyn Gerrard, like Andrew David Ladsky and the rest of his gang of racketeers are more than evil: they are satanic. (I repeat my Comments under Persecution (1)(4)).

These rapacious vampiric monsters are the personification of evil on earth. (I place ALL those who have / are currently aiding and abetting their criminal activities in the same category - including that of assassins).

'Great ambassadors' for the Jewish community that frequently complains of being "victims of antisemitism in society"!...a claim that attracts heavy state support.

(I also repeat my comment that, more so than ever, my heart goes out to the Palestinian people).

Where ALL of that mafia should be - with ALL those who are assisting them - serving LONG prison sentences - thereby preventing them from inflicting yet more criminal actions on the public.

BUT: these criminals are actively protected and assisted by the British state...

...because they are 'Jews'...who make 'such a great' "contribution to this country" = shower Her Majesty's government with large amounts of money - allowing them to act in complete disregard of the law of the land?

And because this island-Kingdom has sold out to crime, and is consequently controlled by crime, for the benefit of crime.

I add that only the corruptible can be corrupted.

 

SUMMARY OF DEMANDS FROM MARTYN GERRARD

 

(1 of 4)- SUMMARY - FRAUDULENT "SERVICE CHARGES", AND 'SUPPORTING EVIDENCE'

 

 
 
 
 
(A more detailed summary is contained in this document)
 

Fraudulent (*) "Service charge" demand

(£)

Period

Detail

Year-end accounts (*)

1

09.07.10 (from MRJ - see Background)

24,002

Assumed: Jan07-Dec10 - as no detail

None supplied - in spite of repeated requests

NOT since 1993 (e.g. Overview # 15)

2

16.02.11

(see # 2)

3,468

1Jan-31Dec11

"Service charge estimates: £196,850"

Sch1: "1.732%= £2,959.12"; Sch2: "1.956%= £508.56"

Ditto

Version # 1 - List items with global sums; no information on meaning of "Schedules", and on "1.732%"; no landlord name and address

3

12.01.12

(see # 5)

3,468

 

1Jan-31Dec12

Identical to 2011

Ditto for 2012 (In spite of claiming otherwise: see # 15)

Same comments apply

4

11.01.13

(see # 9)

1,137

1Jan-30Jun13

1st half

Version # 2 - 18-item list; each with an alleged amount claimed from me; part of a ploy. No mention of "schedules"

Ditto for 2013 (see # 22)

5

16.08.13

(see # 13)

1,137

1Jul-31Dec13

2nd half

Version # 3 - No supporting info; "schedules" have reappeared, but only as a mention

 

6

23.12.13

(see # 17)

4,464

1Jan-30Jun14

1st half

"Budget for 2014: £110,340.19"

Sch1: "1.732%= £929.57";

Sch2: "1.956%= £29.34" = £958.91

+ "£3,504.82 for the boiler" - I have already paid for (# 17 Note 2 & # 21)

 

Version # 4 - As back to using a global sum against each item - but no items listed under "Schedule 2"; still no info on meaning of "Schedules" and percentages

7

27.01.14 (see # 19)

A 'reminder' for £39,900 (US$70,400) - to which the mafia added "£90 penalties for non-payment" (summary below) of? YES! ALL its fraudulent demands! Making this version # 5.

Ditto for 2014 (see # 28)

8

No demand for 2nd half of 2014

959

1Jul-31Dec14

2nd half

Made assumption that amount for 2nd half would be the same as for the 1st half

 

9

22.12.14 (see # 24)

(372)

"YE 2013 adjustment"

Sch1: "-229.22"; Sch 2: "-143.12"

Ditto for 2013 (see # 22)

 

Version # 6 - Failing to send a demand while nonetheless adding £12,59 to the "arrears" - assumed to include "SC £959" + GR £300

 
10

NO "estimates" for yr 2015"

2,500

Year 2015

'Some information' only provided 1.5 yrs later in 08.08.16 'reminder' (# 33); newly introduced "reserve fund"; addition of "late payment charge"

 
11

08.10.15 (see # 28)

173

"YE 2014 adjustment "

Version # 7 - as it does not state "the schedules" to which apply.

Having failed to send a demand, nonetheless added "£2,872.24" to "the arrears"

Ditto for 2014 (see # 28)

12

21.01.16 (see # 30)

1,345

1Jan-30Jun16

1st half

"Service charge: £1,150" - 'understated' by £194.62;

"Reserve fund: £195". Hence, total 'should be': £1,539.44"

 

Version # 8 - (1)- list of items, each with a global amount;

(2)- not split between "schedules";

(3)- new addition of "leaseholder contribution per flat"; some missing, and a new one added;

(4)- 3 different addresses given for 'the landlord' (tactic continued thereafter)

 
13

27.05.16 (see # 32)

A 'reminder' of "arrears" of "45,506" (US$80,240) - to which the mafia added (for the 3rd time by then) "£90 penalties for non-payment" (summary below) of? YES! ALL its fraudulent demands!

 

14

05.07.16 (see # 30)

1,345

30Jun-31Dec16

2nd half

"Service charge: £1,150" - 'understated' by £194.62;

"Reserve fund: £195". Hence, total 'should be': £1,539.44"

Assumed to be for 2nd half.

 

15

08.08.16 (see # 33)

Another 'reminder'!...which is 'the reply' to my 24.07.16 letter to Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis - et.al. (My Diary 27 July 16)

 

For the 1st time, revealed 'some information' "for year 2015" = 1.5 yrs later - and the fact it added a "£30 late payment charge".

Fraudulently added more than 3.5 yrs of "ground rent" - to the 4 yrs I do not owe - with the objective of covering up the particularly outrageous 2011 and 2012 demands.

  TOTAL
£41,266

(US$72,765)

   

Row 2 - Includes £64.52 of "electricity" invoiced by MRJ "for 14 Apr - 13 Oct 10". Hence, included in all the subsequent "service charge" demands.

Rows 4 & 5 - The "minus adjustment of £372" (Row 9) reduces the amount "for year 2013 to £1,902".

Row 8 - I did not receive a demand "estimate" for the 2nd half of 2014. (My 10.02.14 challenge (# 19) 'upset' the mafia's plan (# 17) (summary of the ever growing number of reprisals). (It then continued for year 2015).

Making the assumption that it would be the same amount, brings the total to £1,918.

In its 08.10.15 demand (Row 11) , Gerrard claimed a "£173 adjustment for year 2014" - bringing the total for 2014 to "£5,596.".

(*) 'FRAUDULENT' DEMANDS: NONE OF THE ABOVE "SERVICE CHARGE" DEMANDS ARE COMPLIANT WITH MY LEASE.

Clause 2(2)(c)(ii): "The lessor will use its best endeavours to maintain the annual service charge at the lowest reasonable figure consistent with the due performance and observance of its obligations herein"

Clause 2(2)(h): "The lessee shall if required with every half yearly payment of rent pay service charge on account as the lessor or its agents shall specify at its or their discretion to be a fair and reasonable interim payment"

Clause 2(2)(i): "After the end of each financial year the lessor shall furnish to the lessee an account of the service charge payable by the lessee for such financial year together with a copy of the accountant's Certificate [see # 15 for extracts] due credit being given in such account for any interim payment made by the lessee in respect of such financial year,

and upon the furnishing of such account there shall be paid by the lessee to the lessor the service charge or any balance thereof stated to be payable or there shall be repaid by the lessor to the lessee any amount which may have been overpaid by the lessee by way of interim payment..."

(More extracts, below, under # 15, Comment 5)

   
 

As already referred to, I sent Martyn Gerrard a 10.02.14 ('Special Delivery Next Day') document in which I challenged ALL its demands since its first demand of 11.02.16 - i.e. the demands relating to:

With this, I enclosed a £514.34 (US$907) cheque for - my calculated amount of electricity (below).

It never replied, nor did it cash the cheque within the 6-month statutory limit. In fact, the only 'reply' has been an ever growing number of reprisals (# 28, below).

Hence, it endorses undeniably my below assumption as to the Ladsky racketeers (and supporters') (typically) sinister, Machiavellian plan: to forfeit my apartment - as well as conclusions in my document.

As my document included, on the last page, a 21-day Notice demanding to be supplied with "the name of my landlord and directors" - typically, the shysters concluded that they were also 'above this law'.

 
     

Back to sections

 

(2 of 4)- SUMMARY - FRAUDULENT "NON-PAYMENT PENALTIES" FROM MARTYN GERRARD

 

 

 

Demand

Description

"Late payment charge" (£)

"Admin fee for chasing" (£)

Total (£)

27.01.14 (see # 19)

"Account details between 1 Jan 13 and 27 Jan 14"

30

60

90

08.08.16 (see # 33)

"Late payment charge at 18 Mar 15"

30

-

30

27.05.16 (see # 32)

"At 27 May 16- Admin fee for chasing"; "Late payment fee"

30

60

90

Total (US$370)

£210

Back to sections

 

(3 of 4)- SUMMARY - FRAUDULENT "ELECTRICITY" DEMANDS FROM MARTYN GERRARD

 

(A more detailed summary is contained in this document)
 

Demand

Stated period

Units

Demand (£)

My estimates (£) (1)

1

09.07.10 - (see # 2)

14Apr-8Jul10 = 86 days

Provided

32.07

32.62

2

01.11.10 - (see # 2)

18Jul-12Oct10 = 87 days

Provided

32.45

33.00

3

18.01.11 - (see # 2)

14Oct10-11Jan11= 90 days

Provided

37.84

34.14

4

04.01.12 - (see # 4)

11Jan-6Apr11

Provided

48.61

33.14

5

04.01.12 - (see # 4)

7Apr-10Jul11

Provided

56.69

36.60

6

04.01.12 - (see # 4)

11Jul-28Oct11

Provided

60.90

42.38

7

04.01.12 - (see # 4)

29Oct-19Dec11 = 343 days

Provided

28.30

20.04

8

17.07.12 - (see # 6)

19Dec11-22Jun12 = 187 days

Not provided

106.35

72.05

9

05.11.12 - (see # 7)

23Jun-25Sep12 = 95 days

Not provided

45.35

36.60

10

28.01.13 - (see # 10)

26Sep-20Dec12 = 86 days

Not provided

41.09

33.14

11

15.08.13 - (see # 14)

21Dec12- Mar 12 (sic) (and no day); subsequently determined as 74 days

Not provided

29.99

28.51

12

21.08.13 - (see # 14)

5Mar - Jun 13 (no day); subsequently determined as 99 days

Not provided

21.52

38.14

13

31.10.13 - (see # 14)

12Jun -14Oct13 = 125 days

Not provided

25.75

48.16

14

27.01.14 (see # 18)

15Oct-20Dec13 = 67 days

Not provided

13.46

25.82

 

31.03.14 - (see # 20)

"21Dec13-20Mar14"

Claimed "for the block" (whilst already charged)!

11.44

-

15

No demand

21Dec13-16Jul14 = 208 days

 

22.57

80.14

16

10.07.15 (see # 27)

17Jul14-24Jun15 = 343 days

Not provided

49.31

132.16

17

05.10.15 (see # 27)

24(!!)Jun-30Sep15 = 98 days

Not provided

16.81

37.86

18

12.02.16 (see # 31)

30(!!)Sep15-11Feb16 = 134 days

Not provided

29.25

51.63

19

07.07.16 (see # 31)

12Feb-6Jul16 = 146 days

Not provided

18.81

56.25

20

05.09.16 (see # 31)

7Jul-1Sep16 = 57 days

Not provided

14.26

21.96

21

10.11.16 (see # 31)

2Sep-4Oct16 = 33 days

Not provided

12.21

12.71

20

NO demand; only one line in summary - 10.11.16 (see # 31)

5Oct-2Nov16 = 29 days

Not provided

19.61

11.17

Sub-total

£763.19

£918.13

LESS a so-called "19-12-2011 EDF VAT credit" (15.08.13)

(19.05)

(19.05)

TOTAL
£744.14
£899.08

Less £64.52 demanded in 16.02.11 "service charge" demand (Rows 1 & 2)

-£64.52

 

Total amount of demands

(Shortfall of £14.85 relative to total demanded of £664.77 in 10.11.16 summary demand, started with 05.11.12 demand)

£679.62

 

I stress that I do NOT have access to the electricity meter. As I wrote under para.231 of my 03.06.08 Witness Statement: “...the meters are under the control of ‘the Landlord’ - and under lock and key”.

I also referred to the ongoing battles I had with Joan Hathaway, then MRICS, about the "electricity" charges (detail also under MRJ # 47) - "going back to the 1990's" - in my attempts to get her to send me a copy of the actual demands from the electricity supplier.

Rows 1 and 2 - (As discussed, below, under (2) Comment 2), Martyn Gerrard included these amounts in its initial demand of 16.02.11 - relating to "service charges". Unlike what it did, I am including both amounts in these calculations.

Row 3 - In its first demand "for electricity", of 04.01.12 (Rows 4 to 7), Gerrard did not include this amount.

However, in its typically extremely sick, perverse, sadistic style, it then included the “£37.84” in the next demand of 17.07.12 (Row 8) – by including it in “the arrears” – without referring to the fact that it had done this.

Row 15 - Failure to send me a demand is additional reprisal (by adding to the difficulty of figuring out the demands) for 'my daring' to undermine the mafia's Machiavellian plan (above). Clearly, my 10.02.14 document 'upset' the racketeers no end - as also demonstrated by the other reprisals (# 28, below).

Row 15 is based on - even more of my assumptions on my alleged usage of electricity (I had to start making from the 17.07.12 demand = by then, more than 3 years ago) – by using the totals in the previous and subsequent demands.

As can be seen from the above graph, it represents the highest amount (so far) of my alleged negative use of electricity: -0.95 unit per day (!)

The so-called "EDF credit for VAT: £19.05" - In its 04.01.12 demand (Rows 4 to 7), Gerrard illegally charged me for VAT - a total of £32.42.

1.5 years later, in its 15.08.13 demand (Row 11) it deducted only £19.05". Hence, to this day, it is still charging me - illegally - for "£13.37 VAT".

Total - From the 05.11.12 demand (Row 9) onwards, Gerrard understated "the arrears" by £14.82 / £14.83.

(1) - My estimates - As demonstrated by the above graphs, the amount of electricity claimed I used is nonsensical – as:

(1)- My pattern of consumption did not change up to c. Oct 15 - when I started to work in the hellhole 'concentration camp'.

Since then, my consumption has changed only marginally as, when there is insufficient daylight, I only use a 12 wattage bulb on my desk. I also boil the kettle (for one cup) an extra c. 3 times a day.

Note that it is only after one year of my doing that that the amount claimed went up. Fascinating, isn't it?

Pre Oct 15, as evidenced by e.g. the day and timing of my reporting the ongoing persecution - I was out of the hellhole 7/7 for 12hrs+.

(2)- I obviously could not have been been using a 'negative' amount of electricity - from 5 Mar 13.

In the light of the impossible variations in the demands - added to the fact that the very sick sociopaths have perversely and deliberately stopped providing the alleged number of units used, since the 17.07.12 demand - i.e. stopped providing me with information to which I am, clearly, legally entitled - I resorted to making my own calculations.

To do this, I have:

  • estimated my daily average usage of electricity, rounding it up to 1 unit per day;
  • used the unit cost of electricity, daily standing charge and climate levy as previously supplied - although I have no means of knowing whether or not they are right.
  • (In the then MRJ demands (# 2, below) the daily standing charge was 24.23p per day. In those from Gerrard, the daily charge increased to 24.35p per day e.g. # 4, below).

My being able to nonetheless arrive at estimates undermines the criminal, very seriously mentally deranged sociopaths' intention to add to the criminal psychological harassment - sending them into a rage.

I added - big time - to their (and 'Brotherhood' supporters) fury with my 10.02.14 challenge (snapshot above) - as demonstrated by the ever growing number of reprisals (# 28, below).

Note also the variations in the length of the periods between the demands - from 29 days to 343 days.

(OF NOTE: the'reminders' of: (1)- 27.01.14 (# 19); (2)- 27.05.16 (# 32); (3)- 08.08.16 (# 33) - =did not include 'the outstanding electricity demands').

I repeat the fact that the racketeering ruffians did not cash my 10 Feb 14 cheque for electricity (snapshot above).

Back to sections

 

(4 of 4)- GROUND RENT SUMMARY

 

(A more detailed summary is contained in this document)

Demand

Period (as stated on the demands)

Demand (£)

Cumu-lative(£)

Paid in special account

Cumulative in a/c (£)

 

 

 

 

Date

Amount (£)

 

The 06.06.08 Notice of Discontinuance of "ALL" of the 27.02.07 fraudulent claim (Portner # 31) (that was very viciously and perversely pursued by HM's corrupt judiciary in West London County Court (Overview # 11) meant that it cancelled all the charges, "service charges, reserve fund and ground rent" up to and inclusive of 31 Dec 06.

I then did not receive a demand for ground rent - as legally required (s.166 of the CLRA 2002) - until the (below) 16.02.11 demand from Gerrard. I therefore do not owe any of the previous ground rent, I calculate as £2,400 (US4,230).

Of note: as a ploy to cover up their particularly outrageous 2011 and 2012 "service charge" demands, in their 08.08.16 'reminder' (# 33, below) the multi-criminal racketeers fraudulently added more than 3.5 yrs of "ground rent" (£2,200) - to the 4 yrs I do not owe.

16.02.11 - (see # 2)

25Dec10-23Jun11

300

 

 

 

 

23.06.11 - (see # 3)

24Jun-24Dec11

300

600

 

 

 

12.01.12 - (see # 5)

25Dec11-23Jun12

300

900

My 07.02.12 letter to Gerrard

900

 

17.07.12 - (see # 6)

24Jun-24Dec12

300

1,200

26.07.12

300

 

07.12.12 - (see # 8)

24Dec12-24Jun13

300

1,500

02.01.13

300

1,500 at 02.01.13

16.08.13 - (see # 13)

24Jun-24Dec13

300

1,800

12.07.13

300

1,800 at 12.07.13

02.12.13 - (see # 16)

25Dec13-23Jun14

300

2,100

30.12.13

300

2,102.72 at 30.12.13

16.06.14 - (see # 22)

24Jun-24Dec14

300

2,400

25.06.14

300

2,403.50 at 25.06.14

18.12.14 (see # 24)

25Dec14-23Jun15

Falsely claimed to have taken payment of £300 "from my credit card". Because I reported the event, to save face, 1.5 yrs later, the psychos sent a 08.08.16 'reminder' showing a "Rent received £300" (while giving the wrong dates) (see # 33)

19.10.16 (see # 34)

24Jun-24Dec15

300

2,700

03.11.16

300

 

02.12.15 (see # 29)

25Dec15-23Jun16

300

3,000

06.01.16

300

 

26.05.16 (see # 32)

24Jun-24Dec16

300

3,300

04.07.16

300

3,321.59 at 28.11.16

15.11.16 (see # 35)

25Dec16-23Jun17

300

NOT counting until due

 

 

In addition to the long-standing, ongoing breaches of covenants in my Lease by 'the lessor' - after receiving the third demand for ground rent, in my ('Special Delivery Next day') 07.02.12 correspondence to Martyn Gerrard (# 5, below) - I wrote:

"Amount in specially set-up NatWest account # [ ]. Will be released to my 'landlord' - as defined in my Lease - upon provision of strict legal proof of status - information I have been asking since July 2010."

As, in 2013, yet again, a new 'addition' was made to the collection of paper companies - deliberately leaving many questions unanswered (# 12, below) - with my 10.02.14 document to Martyn Gerrard, I submitted a Notice under the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 to determine the identity of my lessor.

Of course, in breach of legislation - the ruffians did not reply.

Furthermore, to add to the criminal psychological harassment regime, from the beginning of 2016, Martyn Gerrard started to give 3 different addresses for 'the landlord' - making it version 5 (# 30).

I therefore maintain that I am absolutely justified in withholding payment of the ground rent – as I do not know the detail of ‘my landlord’ i.e. I do not know who controls my home – and place it into a separate account – as and when it is demanded in the legally required manner (s.166 of the CLRA 2002).

Why in spite of the mafia’s long-standing, numerous ongoing breaches of my Lease (a legal contract) have I been placing the amounts – as they were legally asked – in a special account?

...with a 10th soon to be added...in Central London County Court:

having ignored, in breach of CPR Pre-action conduct, my 10.11.16 reply to his illegal 19.10.16 letter,..

in his 14.11.16 letter (includes my Comments) Mark Henry Wagner, Wagner & Co (Advisors # 5A), informed me that his "client Greclyde Investments Ltd has instructed [him] to issue a claim against [me] for unpaid ground rent"

And the 21.12.16 claim arrived.

Back to sections

 

(5)- OVERALL SUMMARY OF DEMANDS FROM MARTYN GERRARD (to be updated)

 

Items
Total (£)

Fraudulent "service charges"

41,266.42

72,765

Fraudulent "Non-payment penalties"

210.00

370

Fraudulent "Electricity" demands"

698.06

 

Ground rent

3,300.00

5,820

My total
£45,474.48

79,660

Amount claimed by the Martyn Gerrard racketeers (1)

£47,874.82

84,417

Difference with my total (2)

£2,400.34

(1)- (1)- 05.07.16 "service charge" demand (# 30) / 08.08.16 'reminder' (# 33) = £47,241.28 + (2)- 07.07.16 "electricity" demand (# 31) = £618.69 + £14.89 'shortfall' in 05.11.12 demand = £47,874.82

(2)- Made up of ground rent not owed: £2,400 pre Martyn Gerrard (see above summary)

     
 

The next step by the racketeering, vampiric, monsters and assassins?

Getting a shyster, sole practitioner Mark Henry Wagner, Wagner & Co, to join the mob of assassins by, in his 19.10.16 correspondence, illegally demanding payment of ALL of the above, and threatening me with prosecution.

 
     

Back to sections

 

(1)- Background - 09.07.10 unsupported "service charge" demand of £24,002 from the then Martin Russell Jones (MRJ) = Andrew David Ladsky, and repeats.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

(The below events are reported in My Diary 13 Jul 10)

09.07.10

Demand sent by the then 'managing' agent, Joan Doreen Hathaway, MRICS, MRJ,

"On behalf of the landlord Rootstock Overseas Corp" (= Andrew David Ladsky) - stating:

"Brought forward balance: £24,002.35" (US$42,322) - without any supporting evidence. (More detail under # 2, below).

(The last communication I had received from MRJ was a 01.03.07 demand - preceded by the 27.02.07 fraudulent claim that terminated in a 06.06.08 Notice of Discontinuance of "ALL" the claims against me (Portner # 31)).

Also attached was a demand for "electricity for 14Apr-8July10: £32.07".

15.07.10

In my letter, I asked for supporting evidence.

On 2nd November, in the Jefferson House 'concentration camp', I confronted Hathaway on her failure to respond. As per her typical lies (in correspondence - including to a tribunal), she falsely claimed to have acknowledged my letter.

01.11.10

Dating her communication one day earlier, Hathaway repeated the demand - without, of course, providing any supporting evidence - as well as added a demand for "electricity for 18July-12Oct10: £32.45"

17.11.10

In this reply, I listed some of her, and the rest of the Ladsky's gang of racketeers' major deceits.

I followed this by describing her and the rest of the cabal as "operating as an organised crime 'mafia'".

16.12.10

Continuation of the silence led me to send this letter to Hathaway in which I re-emphasised some of her many breaches of my rights.

18.01.11

Still ignoring my requests for supporting evidence, for the 3rd time 'Hathaway' (= Andrew Ladsky), repeated the demand - as well as added a demand for "electricity for 14Oct10-11Jan11: £37.84".

 

(2)- Version 1 - 16.02.11: start of the fraudulent demands by Rachman Andrew David Ladsky's new puppets, Martyn Gerrard - for an unnamed party: "£3,468 service charge for 2011" - using outrageous "estimates", presented under "schedules" I know nothing about; total demand: £27,470 (US$48,438)

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

The first contact from Martyn Gerrard was this 16.02.11 correspondence from Tom O'Kane, M.C.I.O.B., Assoc. R.I.C.S. It included:

1. Covering LETTER - stating :

  • Enclosing "a service charge demand for the forth coming (sic) year [see below] based on figures that we have received from the previous managing agents" (1)
  • To contact him or colleague "should [I] have any queries".
  • A "section 20 Notice... (2)
  • "Obviously we are just getting to grips with the problems related to the property should you have any information that you believe may be useful I would be more than glad to hear from you..." (3)

(1) - What kind of business would take over:

  • (i)- a claimed debt of "£24,066.87" (US$42,437) (below) without asking for the supporting file?
  • (ii)- from another one without doing any kind of research? At the most basic, anybody would do a search on the Internet. If you Google 'Martin Russell Jones', 'Ladsky' or 'Andrew Ladsky' - it brings up numerous pages and documents contained on my website.

Answer: One that fits with the rest of the Andrew David Ladsky stable of thoroughly evil, sadistic racketeers.

(2) = see Notices # 4.

(3) - So, Martyn Gerrard knows that "there are problems".

Of course, it knows the situation. The objective was to make me waste my time "providing information" - thereby amounting to inflicting additional criminal psychological harassment.

2. 'APPLICATION FOR SERVICE CHARGE: £27,834.55"

It includes:

  • "Balance brought forward from previous managing agents as at 9th February 2011: £24,066.87" (1)
  • "Interim S/Charge (Schedule 1) 1 Jan 2011 to Dec 2011: £2,959.12" (US$5,220) (2)
  • "Interim S/Charge (Schedule 2) 1 Jan 2011 to 31 Dec 2011: £508.56" (US$900) (2)
  • "Ground rent 25 Dec 2010 to 23 Jun 2011: £300.00

(NB: For Martyn Gerrard's statements about "late payment" - see # 3, below)

(NB: Gerrard recycled an IDENTICAL copy of these "estimates" for the year 2012 - see # 5, below)

(1) - "Brought forward balance: £24,066.87" (US$42,320):

It is the Martin Russell Jones (MRJ)'s 01.11.10 demand that comprises of:

  • (1)- the 09.07.10 demand of £24,002.35 (US42,323);
  • (2)- 32.07 'electricity' - to which was added, in the Nov 10 demand, £32.45 'electricity'. A total of £64.52 (# 1, Background, above).

The "Brought forward balance of £24,002.35" was totally unsupported - as the preceding demand was dated 01.03.07 - stating "Balance to pay: £8,712.11".

It was sent about 2 days after Ladsky filed, through Jeremy Hershkorn, then at Portner and Jaskel a 27.02.07 claim against me in West London County Court (Overview # 11) - that was fraudulent.

Relative to the claim, MRJ's 1 Mar 07 demand was £225.06 (US$400) LESS (£8,712.11 v. £8,937.28).

In a 06.06.08 Notice of Discontinuance, "Rootstock Overseas Corp / Steel Services / Sloan Development" (I suggest the spelling as 'SloanE DevelopmentS') dropped "ALL of the 27 Feb 07 claims [against me]" (Overview # 11)...

... - i.e. ALL the charges, service charges, reserve fund and ground rent - up to, and inclusive of 31 Dec 06. The "electricity" was to Oct 06 (Portner # 31)

(As MRJ = Ladsky, supplied the Particulars - in a deliberately incomprehensible format - I produced my own version (I sent to Portner with my 22.05.08 letter)).

As detailed under 'Background', above, MRJ totally ignored my 3 subsequent letters asking for supporting evidence.

Hence, according to the 09.07.10 demand 'from' Martin Russell Jones, "[my] service charges" - for, I presume (as there is no detail) - 4 years (Jan 07 to Dec 10) - "are £21,602" (US$38,090) (£24,002 - £2,400 ground rent) (*) - or an average of £5,400 (US$9,520) per year! (Or, if based on 3.5 years= £6,257).

(*) I assume, from the assumed period covered, is included - although I had never received a legislation-compliant demand. Section 166 of the Commonhold & Leasehold Reform Act 2002 sets out the requirement for demanding payment of ground rent e.g. Gerrard's 16.02.11 letter.

And this - after:

Back Jefferson House in July 2002 and...

...in September 2005

 

(The page on the "Major works" includes, under section 2, extracts from the absolutely unbelievable lies made by Ladsky's "RICS regulated" puppets, Joan Hathaway, MRJ, and Brian Gale to the leaseholders, as well as to the tribunal).

CONTRAST

  • the annual demand of £5,400 - post "the works", with

Hence, the 09.07.10 annual demand of £5,400 (or £6,257?) amounts to 3 (or 3.6) times the 2004 demand.

= (Among others) fraud under the Fraud Act 2006, and false accounting, under the Theft Act s.17 False Accounting - as well as breach of:

  • covenants in my Lease that define the procedure for demanding payment of service charges - as I have not been supplied with Lease-compliant (but not verified) accounts since 1993;
  • Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 - s.20B, time limit on making demands.

Furthermore - I have:

(1) - A £6,100 credit

It has never been acknowledged (Overview # 5).

(I reported this e.g. under header 7 of my 03.06.08 Witness Statement. More than 3 years previously, I had also raised it in my 30.03.05 letter to Hathaway, then MRICS. Typically, she ignored it.

I also reported it on pg 5 of my 10.02.14 communication to Martyn Gerrard; as discussed under # 19, below - it never acknowledged my document).

(2) - A 03.10.03 Consent Order

It exempts me from liability for all of 'Steel Services' costs relating to its 7 Aug 02 application to the tribunal (LVT # 5.3).

(I also reported this e.g. under header 14.6 my 03.06.08 Witness Statement, as well as pg 5 of my 10.02.14 communication to Gerrard. Likewise, it has never been referred to since).

MRJ's electricity demands

The following includes my adding the calculation of the daily average unit of "electricity consumption". In its 17.07.12 demand - # 6, below, Gerrard added the 18.01.11 demand of £37.84 as part of the "arrears" - without stating that it had done this. (See above summary for my comments about the "electricity" demands).

 

09.07.10

My estimates

01.11.10

My estimates

18.01.11

My estimates

Period

14Apr-8Jul10

 

18Jul-12Oct10

 

14Oct10-11Jan11

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

32.07

32.62

32.45

33.00

37.84

34.14

VAT 20% (£)

NO

 

NO

 

NO

 

Total (£)

32.07

 

32.45

 

37.84

 

Previous reading

41079

 

41161

 

41244

 

Present reading

41161

 

41244

 

41361

 

Units

82

86

83

87

117

90

Days

86

 

87

 

90

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

0.1370

 

0.1370

 

Daily stdg charge (£)

0.2423

 

0.2423

 

0.2423

 

Cost stdg charge (£)

20.84

20.84

21.08

21.08

21.81

21.81

Cost units (£)

11.23

11.78

11.37

11.92

16.03

12.33

Cost climate levy (£)

NO

 

NO

 

NO

 

Daily units (calcultd)

0.953

1.000

0.954

1.000

1.300

1.000

(2) - "Service charge estimates for the period ended: 31 Dec 11: £196,850" (US$347,100)

For whom? No name, and no address either (although it is on the summary). Thus, "the estimates" can apply to anybody.

Under section 47 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1987, "the landlord's name and address must be contained in the demand".

Under s.47(2) and s.48(2) of the Act: failure to provide an address (let alone provide a name!) means that any demand is deemed to not be due until the landlord has complied with the Act.

 

(NB: The 'specialities' of the Andrew Ladsky organized crime mafia include making fraudulent demands:

  • on behalf of an unknown company, and without any supporting data, threatening "bankruptcy" and "forfeiture" if payment is not made immediately (Overview # 10 ; Portner # 3).
  • Ignoring the reply that highlights these issues - it proceeds immediately with filing a claim in court (Overview # 11 ; WLCC # 1)).

The “estimated interim service charge” I am ‘deemed to owe’ amounts to £3,467.68 (US$6,115) – composed of: from “Schedule 1: £2,959.12"; from “Schedule 2: £508.56".

"Schedule 1" and "Schedule 2": I have never been informed of these "schedules" - in spite of asking repeatedly:

On pages 6 & 7 of my 10.02.14 correspondence to Gerrard – I reported that my asking Ahmet Jaffer, Portner and Jaskel for an explanation of the "schedules", (in the context of the fraudulent 27 Feb 07 claim) - had not been addressed.

As Gerrard ignored my document, more than 8 years on – my question remains unanswered. ("The schedules" last made their appearance in Gerrard's 22.11.14 "adjustment for year 2013" (see above summary) - equally, of course, without stating the reason).

"Schedule 1: 1.732%"; "Schedule 2: 1.956%"

1.956% has been my share since buying the leasehold apartment (in 1986) - as evidenced by e.g.

As I wrote under header 14.1 of my 03.06.08 Witness Statement (Portner # 29) (in relation to the 2nd fraudulent claim of 27.02.07 filed against me (above)):

I have not been informed of the impact on my 1.956% share of the service charges of the addition of 4 flats to Jefferson House in 2005 – which breaches Clause 2(2)(c)(i) of my Lease”.

I then discussed this under, among other, under paras 144 to 148.

This is still the case - in spite of my also reporting this on pages 6 and 7 of my 10.02.14 document to Gerrard, it opted to ignore. Hence: I do not know how the "1.732%" was arrived at. (I repeat that the "schedules" mysteriously disappeared after the 22.12.14 "adjustment for year 2013").

It is abundantly clear that some of the items in "the £196.850 estimates" are outrageous, and that these “estimatesamount to (among others) a breach of the Fraud Act 2006, and Theft Act s.17 False Accounting...

- and this is futher confirmed by the 08.08.16 'reminder' (# 33, below).

Indeed, the amount is 2.2 times the total expenditure of £89,439.32 (US$157,707) recorded in the so-called "2004 accounts" (the last set I was provided with) (with a 09.01.06 letter) (and likely to already be a rip-off).

(2 years later - as "the major works" were coming to an end - “Steel Services - Estimated expenditure to year-end Dec 06” (that were a rip-off) were £111,667 (US$196,900)).

(See e.g. my 04.10.11 analysis of the Jefferson House ‘service charges’ sent with my 04.10.11 reply to the GLA’s survey on service charges – My Diary 6 Oct 11).

As discussed above, "the major works", that entailed a complete overhaul of Jefferson House, took place between Sep 04 and 2006 i.e. they were terminated just 5 years prior to this 16 Feb 11 demand.

It is impossible that “the charges” increased – over a 5-year period - by 120%, or £107,327 i.e. from £89,439 to £196,850. Even more so when considering the extent of “the major works” carried out (as detailed in the 2002 “Specification” by Brian Gale, MRICS).

I contend that the “£198,850 estimates” – and, therefore, the "£3,467.68 demand from me - which is double my £1,749 share in 2004' - amount to blatant fraud under the Fraud Act 2006, and false accounting under the Theft Act s.17 False Accounting.

The fraudulent nature of the demand is also evidenced by the subsequent demands, including the fraudulent 08.08.16 'reminder' (see # 33). It can also be seen at a glance in the above graphs.

I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary.

(Note that, at the time, Martyn Gerrard described itself on its letterhead as "an agency... where integrity counts" (# 7, below))

Also of note:

Whereas an "adjustment" was made:

  • a reduction of £372.34 "for year 2013 service charges" (below, # 9 and # 13) - in the 22.12.14 demand - reducing the total from £2,274 to £1,902 (# 24);
  • an increase of £172.96 "for year 2014 service charges" (# 28, below) - in the 08.10.15 demand - increasing the total from £1,918 to £2,091 (# 17, below).

NO "adjustment" was made to the demand of:

  • "£3,468 for year 2011" (above),
  • Nor to the same demand of "£3,468 for year 2012" (# 5).

Further, while Martyn Gerrard took over from MRJ at the beginning of 2011 - it did not send me "accounts" for year 2011. The only 'information' I have been provided with in relation to "year 2011" is in the so-called "2012 accounts" (# 15).

3. "Service charges - Summary of tenant's rights and obligations"

(2) "...Service charges are amounts payable for services, repairs, maintenance, improvements..."

My contractual obligations under my Lease (Fourth Schedule) do not include paying for the cost of “improvements. This is the outcome of a con devised by a previous Labour government - that has, of course, been kept. Anything to help crooks when they face leaseholders who lack the knowledge.

(NB: When I looked on the LEASE website, in summer 2016, it had finally pointed this out:

"Works of improvement: as a general rule, leases in the private sector do not oblige leaseholders to contribute to costs of works of improvement to the building.)

For obvious reasons - I did not acknowledge the 16.02.11 correspondence.

By then, it made it the 4th time that this ever growing fraudulent demand was sent to me:

  1. 09.07.10
  2. 01.11.10
  3. 18.01.11
  4. 16.02.11

(My identical Comments are attached to these demands) (updated version) - while all my demands for supporting evidence were ignored (point # 1, above).

Back to sections

 

(2A)- A 16.02.11 fraudulent "Notice for renewal of boilers and heating system" provided glaring evidence of an intention to subject me to more criminal psychological harassment. (It was confirmed 2.6 years later: Notices # 5).

See Notices # 4 - and subsequent events: # 5 and # 6.

 

(3)- 23.06.11 demand for ground rent, used to repeat the 16.02.11 demand of £27,470 - and subsequently ignoring my 07.07.11 letter.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

In the process of demanding £300 ground rent "for Jun11-Dec11", in the 23.06.11 demand, Martyn Gerrard - "an agency... where integrity counts" (# 7, below) - repeats the fraudulent (*) demand of £24,470 (above: # 2).

(*) I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary

The total amount demanded is £28,134.55 (US$49,609). (The previous total was £27,834.55 (US$49,080) ('service charge' summary, above ).

Note the psychos' statements in the 23.06.11 covering letter - that amount to blatant criminal psychological harassment:

"To further assist you we are now able to take payment from you over the telephone using your Debit card" (1)

"...be advised that should we not receive payment by the 7th of July (within 14 days) you will automatically incur a late payment charge in the sum of £30.00 [US$53] (£25 plus VAT), this will increase further by £60.00 [US$106] (£50 plus VAT) each and everytime it is necessary for us to chase this payment" (2)

"I am sure that the additional administration charges will not apply to you as you will endeavour to pay however since those who do not pay will be obliged to cover these costs we are duty bound to advise all lessees of these" (3)

(1) - No doubt a Ladsky input. As:

- I conclude that his Masons' lapdogs in the police give him my financial statements - they steal from my post - allowing him and the other psychos to get their sadistic kicks.

(2) - Unbelievable! But to be expected in the - deliberately totally unregulated - residential leasehold sector and its supporting infrastructure...

...- who ALL collude with each other against a leaseholder 'like me'.

(3) - But, obviously, not "Duty bound" to tell them that the demands are highly fraudulent.

(As Her Majesty's The Queen's police and courts wilfully smear my name, character and reputation: why not follow her lead and indulge in the same practice!)

Based on my religious beliefs: these people and their puppet master, Andrew David Ladsky, are not just very seriously sick monsters, they are satanic (*)

(*) I repeat my Comments under Persecution (1)(4)).

In response, in my 07.07.11 letter, I reported ALL the exchange of 'correspondence' since July 2010 (Background, above).

Of course, my letter was ignored.

Back to sections

 

(4)- 04.01.12 fraudulent demand of £195 "for electricity" - for an unnamed party.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

The 1st comment about the 04.01.12 demand of £195 (US$343) is: on whose behalf is it made? NO name! See # 2 , above, the requirements of ss.47 & 48 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1987.

The 2nd is that it is fraudulent.

The following includes my adding the calculation of the number of days and daily average unit of "electricity consumption". (See above summary for my comments about the "electricity" demands).

 

04.01.12

My estimates

04.01.12

My estimates

Period

11Jan-6Apr11

 

7Apr-10Jul11

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

40.51

33.14

47.24

36.60

VAT 20% (£)

8.10

 

9.45

 

Total (£)

48.61

 

56.69

 

Previous reading

41361

 

41499

 

Present reading

41499

 

41669

 

Units

138

86

170

95

Days (calculated)

86

 

95

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

0.1370

 

Daily standing charge (£)

0.2435

 

0.2435

 

Climate levy per unit (£)

0.0048

     

Cost stdg charge (£)

20.94

20.94

23.13

23.13

Cost units (£)

18.91

11.78

23.29

13.02

Cost climate levy (£)

0.662

0.413

0.816

0.456

Daily units (calculated)

1.605

1.000

1.789

1.000

 

 

04.01.12

My estimates

04.01.12

My estimates

Period

11Jul-28Oct11

 

29Oct-19Dec11

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

50.75

42.38

23.58

20.04

VAT 20% (£)

10.15

 

4.72

 

Total (£)

60.90

 

28.30

 

Previous reading

41669

 

41838

 

Present reading

41838

 

41915

 

Units

169

110

77

52

Days (calculated)

110

 

52

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

0.1370

 

Daily standing charge (£)

0.2435

 

0.2435

 

Climate levy per unit (£)

0.0048

     

Cost stdg charge (£)

26.79

26.79

12.66

12.66

Cost units (£)

23.15

15.07

10.55

7.12

Cost climate levy (£)

0.811

0.528

0.370

0.250

Daily units (calculated)

1.536

1.000

1.481

1.000

 

The total amount of VAT illegally charged is £32.42.

As a result of my highlighting this on this page, Martyn Gerrard stopped doing this in its subsequent demands.

Eventually, 1.5 years later, in its 15.08.13 demand, it subtracted what it called an "EDF VAT credit: £19.05" (# 14, below) - which is clearly not true - as well as implies that it is 'entitled' to illegally charge the difference i.e. £13.37!

Back to sections

 

(5)- For year 2012, an addition of £3,468 (US$6,115) in the 12.01.12 "service charge" demand, by using the same "estimates" as for year 2011 - still for an unnamed party, and also continuing to ignore my correspondence.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

The fraudulent (*) demand of 12.01.12 states: (total) "Amount now due: £31,902.23" (US$56,250). It is composed of 3 components:

(*) I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary

(1) "Service charges estimates for the period ended: 31 Dec 2012" (1)

Relative to the previous 16.02.11 'service charge' demand of £27,470.03 (above: # 2 ; summary) - have been added:

  • (i) "Interim service charge - Sch.1 - 1 Jan - 31 Dec 12: £2,959.12" (US$5,220) (2) (3) (4)
  • (ii) "Interim service charge - Sch.2 - 1 Jan - 31 Dec 12: £508.56" (US$900) (2) (3)
  • a total of £3,467.68 ( US$6,115)

(1) - Yet again - the demand fails to state to which entity it relates (see above, the requirements of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987)

(2) - The amounts are identical to those demanded in the 16.02.11 correspondence (# 2, above) - because based on the "Service charge estimates for the period ended: 31 Dec 2012"...

... - that are identical to the "2011 Estimates" - both in terms of the total "estimated expenditure" of £195,850 (US$347,100) – as well as its composition - all of which, as I stated under point # 2, above, are outrageous "estimates".

Hence: Martyn Gerrard recycled the "2011 Estimates" - proving further the fraudulent nature of these documents - amounting by then to a fraudulent "service charge" demand of £30,938 (US$54,550).

(I again draw your attention to Martyn Gerrard then describing itself as "an agency... where integrity counts" (# 7, below))

(3) - As previously (# 2, above), no information is provided as to the meaning of the "Schedules".

(4) - Likewise, I still do not know how the '1.7320%' used for "Schedule 1", was arrived at (# 2, above)

I repeat my Comments, under # 2, above, about the fact that no "adjustment" was made in relation to this demand i.e. for year 2012.

 

(2) "Ground rent 25 Dec 11 to 23 Jun 12: £300" (ground rent summary, above)

(3) "Balance brought forward: £28.134.55" (US$49,609)

This "£28.134.55 balance" is comprised of: 16.02.11 total of "£27,834.22" + 23.06.11 £300 ground rent, "for Jun11-Dec11".

Of course, the covering letter includes the same criminal psychological harassment statements - see # 3, above.

Needless to say that Martyn Gerrard continued to ignore my 07.07.11 letter (# 3, above).

On 07.02.12 I sent (by 'Special delivery next day) a copy of the 3 ground rent demands, writing on each:

"Note from N Klosterkotter-Dit-Rawé:

AMOUNT IS IN SPECIALLY SET-UP NATWEST ACCOUNT #....

WILL BE RELEASED TO MY 'LANDLORD' - AS DEFINED IN MY LEASE - UPON PROVISION OF STRICT LEGAL PROOF OF STATUS - INFORMATION I HAVE BEEN ASKING SINCE JULY 2010"

Of course, yes, this correspondence has, as in the case of my 07.07.11 letter - been ignored.

(The criminal psychological harassment tactic is the potential threat of forfeiture (copy of definition). See next point).

(NB: This mafia feels totally free to ignore my so-called 'right' to know who controls my home (Owners identity # 1), because it knows that, in this island-Kingdom, any legislation, regulation, etc. that 'gives rights' to 'Proles', 'like me' - is just window dressing - see my Comments under BVI # 2(4) re. 'the benefits of offshore jurisdiction'.

Other example as supporting evidence, re. the identity of 'the landlord': the judiciary ignoring my highlighting repeatedly the illegality of the 27 Feb 07 claim against me: Overview # 11 - and my being 'punished' for 'daring' to challenge it: Overview # 12.

As, in 2013, there was again 'a change' in the ownership of Jefferson House (# 12, below) - with my 10.02.14 correspondence to Martyn Gerrard I submitted a Notice under the Landlord & Tenant 1985 to determine the identity of my lessor. (As with the rest of my document: it ignored it).

Back to sections

 

(6)- 17.07.12 unsupported demand of £160 "for electricity ", while repeating the fraudulent "service charge" demands - and continuing to ignore my correspondence... - now that Martyn Gerrard is a "firm regulated by the RICS"

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

In addition to a repeat of the fraudulent (*) 12.01.12 demand of £30,938 (US$54,550) (above: # 5 ; summary) - this 17.07.12 demand states:

(*) I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary

(1) "Electricity for the period 19/12/2011 to 22/06/2012: £106.35"

The following includes my adding calculations due to the lack of provision of data. (See above summary for my comments about the "electricity" demands).

 

17.07.12

My estimates

 

Whereas the 04.01.12 "electricity" demand (# 4, above), provided 'supporting detail' - this demand does NOT provide ANY detail on consumption.

Evidently, the criminal mafia and its gang leader Andrew David Ladsky 'did not like' my challenge, under # 4, above, in relation to the 04.01.12 demand.

(Since summarised, and placed under "Electricity" summary, above).

NOTE that while this policy of 'NO INFORMATION' continued in relation to the "electricity" demands ("electricity" summary, above) - it was also extended to the "service charge" demand (# 9, below)

(I again draw your attention to Martyn Gerrard then describing itself as "an agency... where integrity counts" (# 7, below))

Period

20Dec11-22Jun12

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

106.35

72.05

VAT 20% (£)

NO (unlike # 4 above)

 

Total (£)

106.35

 

Previous reading

41915

 

Present reading

NO detail of units

 

Units (calculated)

429

187

Days (calculated)

187

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

Climate levy per unit (£)

0.0048

 

Unit cost + levy (clctd) (£)

0.1418

 

Daily standing charge (£)

0.2435

 

Cost stdg chrg (clcltd) (£)

45.53

45.53

Cost units (Total - std chrg) (calculated) (£)

60.82

26.52

Cost climate levy (above)

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

2.293

1.000

The demand states "Arrears as at 17/07/2012: £232.33". The previous demand of 04.01.12 amounted to "£194.49" (# 4, above).

The difference of £37.84 is from MRJ's 18.01.11 demand - that Gerrard had not (unlike the previous two demands) included in its first "service charge" demand (# 2, above).

Typically for these extremely sick, perverse, sadistic shysters, they included it in the "arrears" - without stating that they had done this.

Demonstrating that it is (concurrently with Ladsky's lapdogs in the police - et.al) monitoring my website very closely - the mafia 'responded' to my comments - from # 2 above, that:

(1)- the demands were made without stating the name of the landlord - in this demand of 17.07.12, it:

  • quotes s.48 of the L&T Act 1987 (previously, it had not done that either) (*);

(*) See above, the requirements of ss 47 & 48 the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987

(2)- it had illegally been charging me for VAT (# 4, above) - as, from this demand on - it stopped doing this. (1.5 years later, it only partially deducted the amount of VAT it had charged illegally: # 14, below) .

(2) "Ground rent for period 24/06/2012 - 24/12/2012: £300"

On 26.07.12, I placed the £300.00 in the special account (# 5, above) - bringing the total to £1,200.00 (US$2,116). (Summary ground rent, above)

Of course - continuation of the criminal psychological harassment tactics:

Perhaps the multi-criminal Andrew David Ladsky is counting on his 'brothers' in the judiciary (see snapshot under kangaroo court) to, at some point, agree to grant him forfeiture (copy of definition) of my apartment...

...- because his conduct is, 'of course', 'beyond reproach' (Her Majesty's Master Eyre - QB # 4(6)(5)(3)). (NB: Evidence, 2 years later, that my instinct was right - see # 19, below).

(2)- The covering letter includes the same criminal psychological harassment statements - see # 3, above -including stating: “I am sure you will make every endeavour to ensure that the payment is with us by return.”.

I also note the addition of the RICS logo at the top of the page, and of the line at the bottom of the page: "This Firm is regulated by the RICS".

Translation: = totally unregulated - as demonstrated by:

This document is my assessment of the decorations on Martyn Gerrard's letterhead paper (referred to under the above Introduction).

Back to sections

 

(7)- Unsupported 05.11.12 demand of £45 "for electricity" - making it the second unsupported demand from Martyn Gerrard.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

This 05.11.12 demand states: "Total amount due: £369.20" (US$651). It includes 2 components.

(1) "Electricity for the period 23/06/2012 to 25/09/2012: £45.35"

The following includes my adding calculations due to the lack of provision of data. (See above summary for my comments about the "electricity" demands).

 

05.11.12

My estimates

 

It makes it the 2nd unsupported "electricity" demand (previous, # 6, above).

NOTE that this policy of 'no information' was also extended to the "service charge" demand (# 9, below)

Period

23Jun-25Sep12

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

45.35

36.60

VAT 20% (£)

NO (unlike # 4 above)

 

Total (£)

45.35

 

Previous reading

NO detail of units

 

Present reading

NO detail of units

 

Units (calculated)

157

95

Days (calculated)

95

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

Climate levy per unit (£)

0.0048

 

Unit cost + levy (clctd) (£)

0.1418

 

Daily standing charge (£)

0.2435

 

Cost stdg chrg (clcltd) (£)

23.13

23.13

Cost units (Total - std chrg) (calculated) (£)

22.22

13.47

Cost climate levy (above)

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

1.649

1.000

(2) "Arrears as at 05/11/2012: £323.85"

"£323.85" v. the previous demand, of 17.07.12 (# 6, above), which states: "Total amount due: £338.68". Hence, these latest "arrears" are £14.82 LESS. (Summary of "electricity" demands, above).

The quote "The award-winning agency...where integrity counts" is a new addition to Martyn Gerrard's letterhead.

Considering the dictionary definition of 'integrity' - see from # 2, above, how it translates in the case of Martyn Gerrard, "A firm regulated by the RICS" - and:

(In early 2014, it was replaced by: "50 years of fulfilling dreams" (Of criminals?) This document contains my assessment of Gerard's decorations on its letterhead paper - at July 15 - see Introduction).

Of course, the covering letter continues to include the same criminal psychological harassment statements - see # 3, above.

Back to sections

 

(8)- 07.12.12 repeat by the "RICS regulated" Martyn Gerrard of the fraudulent demands "for service charges"....in the process of asking for ground rent.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

In addition to a repeat of the fraudulent (*) 12.01.12 demand of £30,938 (US$54,550) (above: # 5 ; summary) - the purpose of this 07.12.12 demand is a demand for ground rent, for "24 Dec 12 - 24 Jun 13" of £300.

(*) I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary

I have paid this amount into the special account (my 07.02.12 letter Gerrard, under # 5, above) - bringing the total to £1,500 (summary of ground rent, above).

Back to sections

 

(9)- Version 2 - 11.01.13 addition of £1,137 "for service charges for the first half of 2013" - presented as an 18-item-list, each with an amount claimed from me (preparation for the sinister Machiavellian plan (# 33)); no reference to "schedules"

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

This 11.01.13 (equally fraudulent) (*) demand states: "Total amount due: £33,639.20" (US$59,316). (Summary of 'service charges' + summary of ground rent, above).

(*) I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary

It includes 2 components:

(A) "Request for payment" (1)

It lists 18 items - stating for each:

  • "for the period 01/01/2013 to 30/06/2013"
  • a "Net" and a "Gross" amount - that are the same as "VAT" is stated at "0.00"

"Total: £1,136.97" (US$2,005) (2)

(1) - "Request for payment" - Unlike the previous demands 16.02.11 (# 2, above), and 12.01.12 (# 5, above) that stated: "Interim service charge" / "Service charge estimates".

(2) - 18 priced items - Unlike the previous demands 16.02.11 (# 2, above), and 12.01.12 (# 5, above):

(1)- there is no supporting 'evidence' whatsoever of the basis on which the sums are claimed...

...- thereby following the same policy of 'NO information' re. "electricity" demands since July 2012 ("electricity" summary, above);

(2)- this demand is not split between the "schedules";

(3)- it covers only the first 6 months of 2013 - thereby providing 'the opportunity' to add to the criminal psychological harassment.

NOTE, in the covering letter, the criminal psychological harassment statement by the thoroughly evil psychos:

"...enclosed a "Request for payment" for services charges...in accordance with the Lease".

Evidently, they must be using "the Lease" that Ladsky and his other racketeering gang members used for:

...BOTH of which claimed that: "The amount of Service Charge payable by the Lessee for each financial year of the Lessor shall be a fair proportion (to be determined by and at the sole discretion of the Lessor)..." (Absolutely outrageous!)

(Of course, Gerrard followed by the other usual criminal psychological harassment statements - see # 3, above).

= As insane as their multi-criminal gang leader, Andrew David Ladsky.

Evidently, the mafia 'did not like' my challenge:

  • (2)- my highlighting that the subsequent demand of 12.01.12 was based on "estimates" identical to those of the previous year (# 5, above).

And, as Ladsky, the multi-criminal - knows he has free rein to do whatever he wants - as he evidently has the run of this island-Kingdom: why not!

What will the evil psychos come up with in June-July 2013? Watch this space! (see # 13, below for the next instalment)

(B) "Arrears as at 10/01/2013: £32,502.23"

"£32,502.23" - comprising "Arrears as at 07/12/2012: £32,202.23" (see notes under # 8, above, re 07.12.12 demand) + £300 ground rent in the 07.12.12 demand.

Back to sections

 

(10)- 28.01.13 unsupported demand of £41.09 "for electricity" - making it the 3rd unsupported demand "for electricity".

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

This 28.01.13 demand states: "Total amount due: £410.29" (US$723).

The following includes my adding calculations due to the lack of provision of data. (See above summary for my comments about the "electricity" demands).

 

28.01.13

My estimates

 

This makes it the 3rd totally unsupported demand "for electricity" ("electricity" summary, above).

(Note that the same policy of 'no information' has also been adopted in relation to "service charges": # 9, above - and was then 'outperformed': # 13, below)

 

(I again draw your attention to Martyn Gerrard then describing itself as "an agency... where integrity counts" (# 7, above))

Needless to say that the covering letter continues to include the same criminal psychological harassment statements - see # 3, above.

Period

26Sep-20Dec12

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

41.09

33.14

VAT 20% (£)

NO (unlike # 4 above)

 

Total (£)

41.09

 

Previous reading

NO detail of units

 

Present reading

NO detail of units

 

Units (calculated)

142

86

Days (calculated)

86

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

Climate levy per unit (£)

0.0048

 

Unit cost + levy (clctd) (£)

0.1418

 

Daily standing charge (£)

0.2435

 

Cost stdg chrg (clcltd) (£)

20.94

20.94

Cost units (Total - std chrg) (calculated) (£)

20.15

12.19

Cost climate levy (above)

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

1.652

1.000

Back to sections

 

(11)- 2.6 years after sending me an initial "notice for renewal of boilers and heating system" (Notices # 4), the racketeers resurrected it by sending me: an identical 16.08.13 "Notice"; 23.12.13 demand for payment of £3,504.82 (US$6,180) "as [my] contribution for the boiler" - when, in fact, I have already paid for it.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

I received the 16.08.13 so-called 'notice' on 21 Aug, followed by other correspondence.

As I demonstrated in my 10.02.14 document to the Ladsky mafia: I have already paid for the boiler - see Notices # 5 for detail.

Note that 2.6 years earlier, the covering letter from Tom O'Kane MCIOB, Assoc RICS, (Notices # 4) to the 16.02.11 'notice' - stated:

"...it would appear that there is no doubt that works need to be carried out this year to ensure that the heating will function correctly next winter."

Actually, there was 1 difference:

(See also Notices # 6 for subsequent events).

Back to sections

 

(12)- In his 16.08.13 letter that leaves many questions unanswered, Saul Maurice Gerrard communicated that 'apparently', "as a result of a transfer from Rootstock Overseas Corp", (that had been described as the "head lessee"), "the freeholder of Jefferson House is now GREYCLYDE INVESTMENTS Limited". (This, at least 8th addition, is linked to Martyn Gerrard).

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

See Freehold # 2 for detail.

With my 10.02.14 correspondence to Martyn Gerrard I submitted a Notice under the Landlord & Tenant 1985 to determine the identity of my lessor. Predictably for that mafia, it never replied.

Back to sections

 

(13)- Version 3 - 16.08.13 "service charge" demand of £1,137 (US$2,000) "for the 2nd half of 2013". By comparison to the "1st half-year" 11.01.13 demand (# 9 above): it re-introduces the 2 "schedules" - but, only states a total amount for each i.e. no other data supplied; total: £ 33,211.64 (US$58,562).

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

This fraudulent (*) demand of 16.08.13 (delivered on 21 Aug) is the mafia continuing to get its sadistic kicks by dishing out yet more criminal psychological harassment - acting in tandem with Andrew David Ladsky's henchmen in the British state (2013 summaries: British Transport Police; Others in the British state, and Ladsky).

(*) I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary

The demand includes 2 components:

(A) - "Request for payment" (1)

"Service charge - SC Schd 1 - 2nd 1/2 of 2013: £1,039.16"

"Service charge - SC Schd 2 - 2nd 1/2 of 2013: £97.80" (2)

(1) - Repeat of the header in the 11.01.13 demand (see my comment # 1, under # 9, above)

(2) - Unlike the previous demand, this one re-introduces "the schedules" (e.g. 12.01.12 demand, # 5, above)...

... - BUT, this time only states the amount for each of the 2 "schedules" i.e. No other data supplied.

Total demanded: £1,136.96 (US$2,000) - which is the same as for the previous "1/2 year" demand of 11.01.13 (# 9, above) - bringing the total for year 2013 to £2,273.93 (US$4,010).

Hence, relative to the previous yearly demands: (1) "for 2011", 16.02.11 (# 2, above) ; (2) "for 2012", 12.01.12 (# 5, above) - EACH demanding £3,468 (US$6,115) for the year,...

...this one is £1,194 (US$2,105) less, or a 34.43% reduction. WHY? As there is no data: your guess is good as mine.

(NB: In the 22.12.14 demand i.e. 1.5 years later (# 24, below) the amount "for year 2013" was reduced by £372.34, down to £1,901.59 (£2,273.93 - £372.34)).

At the time of the demand, I wrote: "relative to the £1,749 year-end demand in 2004 i.e. 9 years previously, it represents an increase of 30%, amounting to a 3.33% annual average increase. However, as previously stated:

  • during the said period, 4 apartments, including a massive penthouse that is c. 7 times the size of my apartment were added – thereby reducing my share of the ‘service charges’ – which, as I have already reported, has NEVER been communicated to me.

Further, as also stated previously: in breach of covenants in my Lease that define the procedure for demanding payment of services charges – I have not been supplied with Lease-compliant accounts since 1993 (!!!). This is still the case.

Of course, the covering letter, from Petra Connolly, management assistant, includes the same psycho comments:

I am sure you will make every endeavour to ensure that the payment is with us by return.”

"To further assist you we are now able to take payment from you over the telephone using your Debit card."

And with the same threats of “charges for late payment” (# 3, above) – captured on the demand.

= Continuation of the blatant criminal psychological harassment...

...added to yet more confirmation (if any more was required) (this page, including my highlighting their breaches of the law, has been on my site since 2011) - that Martyn Gerrard and its puppet master Andrew David Ladsky know they have Her Majesty’s "arslikhan" police in their pocket.

(B) - "Ground rent - 24 Jun 13 - 24 Dec 13: £300"

I placed the amount in the special account, 1 month before the demand - see Summary of ground rent, above.

Back to sections

 

(14)- Continuing to add to its sadistic kicks by dishing out (in tandem with the British state) more criminal psychological harassment - the mafia sent these 15.08.13, 21.08.13 and 31.10.13 unsupported demands "for electricity"...

- making them the 4th, 5th and 6th such demands - as well as marking the start of my 'apparently' using 'an ever growing amount of negative electricity' (!)

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

The following, about the 15.08.13 and 21.08.13 demands, includes my adding calculations due to the lack of provision of data. (See above summary for my comments about the "electricity" demands).

 

15.08.13

My estimates

 

This makes it the 4th unsupported demand "for electricity" ("electricity" summary, above).

(Note that the same policy of 'no information' has also been adopted in relation to "service charges": # 9 and # 13, above).

The end period is only defined by the month: “03/12” (incorrectly stated as 2012) i.e. NO day of the month. (I had to wait until the next demand 'hoping' that it would define the day).

(I, yet again, draw your attention to Martyn Gerrard then describing itself as "an agency... where integrity counts" (# 7, above))

 

Note how my alleged "electricity consumption" keeps going down (summary).

Period

21Dec12-Mar12 (sic) (and NO day)

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

29.99

28.51

VAT 20% (£)

NO (unlike # 4 above)

 

Total (£)

29.99

 

Previous reading

NO detail of units

 

Present reading

NO detail of units

 

Units (calculated)

84

74

Days (calculated)

74

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

Climate levy per unit (£)

0.0048

 

Unit cost + levy (clctd) (£)

0.1418

 

Daily standing charge (£)

0.2435

 

Cost stdg chrg (clcltd) (£)

18.02

18.02

Cost units (Total - std chrg) (calculated) (£)

11.97

10.49

Cost climate levy (above)

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

1.141

1.000

Against the demand, a “19-12-2011 EDF Credit for VAT: £19.05 has been entered - reducing the demand's total to £10.94 (US$19).

I most strongly assert that the reason this was done – 1.5 years later! – is because, on this page, I highlighted the illegal addition of VAT BY Martyn Gerrard – on ALL the 2011 demands (# 4, above). Hence, NOT as claimed, an “EDF credit”.

As can be seen under # 4, the total amount of VAT illegally charged by Gerrard on the 2011 demands was £32.42.

Hence, the £19.05 'credit' means that the ruffians consider themselves to be nonetheless 'entitled' to illegally charge me £13,37 of VAT.

= Continuation of the psychos getting their sadistic kicks.

Therefore, no point trying to find out. (As briefly discussed in my above Comments below the "electricity" summary, 10 years ago, I had a 3-year running battle about "electricity charges" with Gerrard's predecessor - the also "RICS regulated" - then Martin Russell Jones (MRJ) - in vain).

 

21.08.13

My estimates

 

This makes it the 5th unsupported demand "for electricity" ("electricity" summary, above).

(Note that the same policy of 'no information' has also been adopted in relation to "service charges": # 9 and # 13, above).

As previously: the end period is only defined by the MONTH: “06/13” i.e. no day of the month.

(The follow on demand, below, states the end date as: "12 June")

This one marks the start of my 'apparently' 'using a negative amount of electricity' (!!!) (see summary, above).

 

 

Period

5Mar-Jun13 (NO day)

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

21.52

38.14

VAT 20% (£)

NO (unlike # 4 above)

 

Total (£)

21.52

 

Previous reading

NO detail of units

 

Present reading

NO detail of units

 

Units (calculated)

(18)

99

Days (calculated)

99

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

Climate levy per unit (£)

0.0048

 

Unit cost + levy (clctd) (£)

0.1418

 

Daily standing charge (£)

0.2435

 

Cost stdg chrg (clcltd) (£)

24.11

24.11

Cost units (Total - std chrg) (calculated) (£)

(2.59)

14.04

Cost climate levy (above)

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

(0.184)

1.000

Note the Ladsky mafia’s objective of causing drip-drip criminal psychological harassment:

  • the previous, 15.08.13 demand, was posted on 16 Aug 13 (with other enclosures, above: # 11 , # 12 , # 13); I received it on 21 Aug;
  • this demand – that covers 'March to June' - was posted on 21 Aug; I received it on 24 Aug.

 

31.10.13

My estimates

This makes it the 6th unsupported demand "for electricity" ("electricity" summary, above).

Unlike the previous 2 demands, the day of the month for the end period is now defined (14 Oct). Lucky me! I don’t have to wait for the next demand to find out when the end date was.

"[My 'negative'] consumption of electricity" keeps increasing! (see also # 18)

In my 10.02.14 document to Martyn Gerrard, I asked:

"What is your and Ladsky’s game? Planning to run along to his judiciary / tribunal friends and say: “Look, even when we don’t charge her for electricity, she still complains that the invoices are fraudulent”?"

That's what the mafia is doing: planning to, yet again, drag me through one of its evidence-and-rule-of-law-blind-courts - and, this time, finish me off.

Period

12Jun-14Oct13

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

25.75

48.16

VAT 20% (£)

NO (unlike # 4 above)

 

Total (£)

25.75

 

Previous reading

NO detail of units

 

Present reading

NO detail of units

 

Units (calculated)

(33)

125

Days (calculated)

125

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

Climate levy per unit (£)

0.0048

 

Unit cost + levy (clctd) (£)

0.1418

 

Daily standing charge (£)

0.2435

 

Cost stdg chrg (clcltd) (£)

30.44

30.44

Cost units (Total - std chrg) (calculated) (£)

(4.69)

17.73

Cost climate levy (above)

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

(0.264)

1.000

(Other telltale signs: "the service charges" are apparently 'going down': above # 2 and # 5 v. # 9 and # 13 - and below # 17; plus the 'reminder' # 19; plus the use of plants)

Back to sections

 

(15)- Continuing with the criminal psychological harassment regime, Gerrard's Alex Brooks sent me a "2012 Jefferson House Service charge statement"

- produced by ICAEW-endorsed accountants, ERRINGTON LANGER PINNER, for an unnamed party - that is not compliant with my Lease;

concurrently, it lied that it had "followed" an ICAEW technical release.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

With his 12.09.13 letter (of which I took delivery on 17 Sep 13), Alex Brooks, Accounts Assistant, Martyn Gerrard, sent me an enclosure, describing it as

"the latest year end accounts [1], to keep for your own records" (2)

(1) - As discussed in the following, the document cannot be described as "year end accounts"

(2) - Psychos! I am adding to "[my] own records" - headed "Criminal psychological harassment - by the satanic (*) Andrew David Ladsky mafia". (*) I repeat my Comments under Persecution (1)(4)

The enclosure was produced by a new addition to the stable: ERRINGTON LANGER PINNER, ICAEW-endorsed accountants, Pyramid House, 956 High Road, Finchley, London N12 9RX (a 2-director, I conclude: Jewish firm) - stating:

"Jefferson House, 11 Basil Street, London SW3 - Service charge statement for the year ended 31 December 2012" (1)

"Accountant's report of factual findings to the Landlord of Jefferson House [2], 11 Basil Street, London SW3"

"You have stated that an audit of the service charge accounts in accordance with International Standards on Auditing is not required under the terms of the residents leases for Jefferson House..." (3)

"In accordance with our engagement letter, we have performed the procedures agreed with you and enumerated below with respect to the service charge statement of account set out in this document in respect of Jefferson House...for the year ended 31 December 2012 in order to provide a report of factual findings about the service charge accounts that you have issued." (4)

"This report is made to the Landlord for issue with the service charge accounts in accordance with the terms of our engagement. Our work has been undertaken to enable us to make this report to the Landlord and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Landlord for our work or for this report." (4)

Basis of report

"Our work was carried out having regard to TECH 03/11 "Residential Service Charge Accounts" [5] published jointly by the professional accountancy bodies with ARMA and RICS. In summary, the procedures we carried out with respect of the service charge accounts were:

"1. to check whether the figures contained in the accounts were extracted correctly from the accounting records maintain by or on behalf of the Landlord" (5);

"2. to check, based on a sample whether entries in the accounting records were supported by receipts, other documentation or evidence that we inspected; and" (5)

"3. to check whether the balance of service charge monies for this property agreed or reconciled to the bank statements for the accounts in which the funds are held." (5)

"Because the above procedures do not constitute either an audit or a review made in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK and Ireland) or International Standards on Review Engagements, [5] we do not express any assurance on the service charge accounts other than in making the factual statements set out below." (6)

Had we performed additional procedures [7] or had we performed an audit or review of the financial statements in accordance with International Standards..., other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you." (7)

Report of factual findings: (8)

It is followed by: (9)

(1) "Balancing statement as at 31 December 2012"

(2) "Service charge income and expenditure account for the the accounting year ended 31 December 2012" - with items under "Schedule 1" and "Schedule 2"

(3) "Notes to the service charge accounts for the year ended 31 December 2012" - which, under 4. "Reserves", states: "The reserve fund has been established to provide funds in order to pay for major repairs which are expected to arise in the future." The "Balancing statement" states that the "Contingency fund contains £441,882"

(1) - "Service charge statement" = same description as for e.g. the 2004 so-called 'accounts'.

The last time I was supplied with accounts that are compliant with my Lease (extracts below) was for "year-end 1993" (although, I did not have them verified) = more than 20 years ago!

(2) - Name of "landlord"? Not provided.

Contrast this with e.g. the 2004 so-called 'accounts' that stated: "Steel Services Limited".

Perhaps because the paper company does not exist - as happened previously?

(3) - "You have stated...not required under the terms of the lease..."

= In producing a "Service charge statement" - breach by the ICAEW-endorsed Errington Langer Pinner of TECH 03/11 - issued by its professional body, the Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) - it claimed to have "followed" - see Com # 5 below.

A prior example emphasising that "the accountant should be familiar with the lease":

Article in Audit News, October 1998:

  • "The lease will specify those costs which are, or perhaps are not, recoverable as part of any service charges, and the way in which allowable costs are to be accounted for to the tenants ..."
  • "Do you have copies of the relevant leases (which may be different for each tenant)?
  • Have you understood the lease requirements and discussed them with the landlord/agent?
  • What level of comfort are you expected to give in your report?
  • Are these matters clearly set out in your engagement letter?

(4) - "...have performed the procedures agreed with you... to provide a report of factual findings about the service charge accounts that you have issued"

"This report is made...in accordance with the terms of our engagement...and for no other purpose...we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Landlord for our work or for this report."

= Attempts (that would not stand up in an impartial court) (which, in my case, does not exist) to cover its backside for failing deliberately - to produce a "Service charge statement" that "has been issued" (at least to me, a lessee) - with regard to the requirements of the Lease - as specified by its professional body (above).

(5) - "Our work was carried out having regard to TECH 03/11 "Residential Service Charge Accounts"; "In summary, the procedures we carried out were..."

= IRRELEVANT - as non-compliant with the terms of my my Lease.

Therefore, also a lie by the ICAEW-endorsed lapdog, Errington Langer Pinner - as the beginning of TECH 03/11 issued by the ICAEW very clearly states that "the requirements of the lease take precedence".

Extracts from my Lease:

Clause 2(2)(d) - “...after the end of each financial year… the lessor shall cause the amount of the service charge payable by the lessee for such financial year to be determined by an accountant…”

Clause 2(2)(e) - “… the costs expenses and outgoings incurred by the lessor...shall be deemed to include not only the costs expenses and outgoings which have been actually disbursed incurred or made by the lessor during the relevant year…

...but also the sum or sums (...the ‘contingency payment) on account of any other costs expenses and outgoings (not being of an annually recurring nature) which the lessor shall have incurred at any time prior to the commencement of the relevant financial year or shall expect to incur at any time after the end of the relevant financial year…

...as the accountant may in his reasonable discretion consider it reasonable to include... in the amount of the service charge for the relevant financial year

Clause 2(2)(f) - “...the accountant shall prepare a written statement containing a summary of the costs expenses and outgoings incurred by the lessor during the relevant financial year together with any future sums indicated by the accountant pursuant to Clause 2(2)(e)..

...and specifying the amount of the service charge payable by the lessee

...and in the accountant’s certificate the accountant shall certify:

(i) that in his opinion the said summary represents a fair summary of the said costs and outgoings set out in a way which shows how they are or will be reflected in the service charge

(ii) that in his opinion the said summary is sufficiently supported by accounts receipts and other documents which have been produced to him

(iii) that the sum specified represents the amount of the service charge payable by the lessee for the relevant financial year of the lessor"

(More extracts, above, under 'Summary of fraudulent "service charges"')

 

The nature of the "Expenses and outgoings" that can be charged to the lessees by the lessor are defined under the 4th Schedule of the Lease - which the ICAEW-endorsed Errington Langer Pinner would NOT know about, as it opted to ignore it (Com #3, above).

(6) - "we do not express any assurance on the service charge accounts other than in making the factual statements set out below." (*)

As evidenced by the above extracts from my Lease = breach of my Lease - that requires "certifying" the sums.

Certification implies CERTAINTY

e.g. Reply from the Association of Chartered Certified Accountants to the consultation paper issued by the government on the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002:

The accountant's report is referred to in primary legislation as a ‘certificate'….certification is only appropriate to a matter capable of determination with certainty

(*) = The outcome of the sacrosanct landlord lobby and of its puppets ensuring the ongoing rip-off of leaseholders, by dictating their requirements to their flunkies in Parliament - see my Comments to CLRA 2002 s.152.

And of course, the ICAEW-endorsed lapdog, Errington Langer Pinner fails to highlight, for example, that there is "no separate meter relating to the electricity charged for the common parts" - as stated in e.g. the 1993 accounts.

(7) - "Had we performed additional procedures" = complying with the requirements of the Lease,... other matters might have come to our attention that would have been reported to you." How very convenient!

(8) - "Report of factual findings" - Surprise, surprise! It has a TICK AGAINST each of its 3 "procedure items"!

(9) - For obvious reasons, I am not wasting my time looking at these.

OVERALL: What else can you expect from somebody prepared to work for multi-criminal Rachman Andrew David Ladsky...as very amply demonstrated by the rest of his gang of racketeers.

It demonstrates further the type of firms "endorsed and regulated" by the 'ICAEW' (my complaint against Pridie Brewster- summary # 6.1); the 'RICS' (my complaint against the then MRJ- summary # 6.2); “ARMA and ALEP” (this document contains my assessment of these endorsements) (see Introduction, above).

Back to sections

 

(16)- 02.12.13 repeat by the "RICS regulated" Martyn Gerrard of the fraudulent demands "for service charges"....in the process of asking for ground rent.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

(Re. 'fraudulent': I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary)

02.12.13 "Request for payment":

"Ground rent (25/12/2013 - 23/06/2014): £300" (1)

"Arrears as at 02/12/2013: £35,076.16" (2)

"Total amount due: £35,376.16"

(1) - As previously, I placed in special account; see summary ground rent, above.

(2) - See also summary "service charge", above.

Back to sections

 

(17)- Version 4 - Continuation of the criminal psychological harassment by, in the 23.12.13 demand, repeating the fraudulent "service charge" demands - in the process of demanding:"£959 service charges for the 1st half of 2014"...

- this time returning to providing components, but only under "schedule 1"; "£3,505 contribution for the boiler" - in spite of the fact that I have already paid for it.

Continuation of the racketeers cooking their next attack: plan to forfeit my apartment.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

(Re. 'Fraudulent': I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary)

23.12.13 "Request for payment"

"SC Schedule 1 – for the period 01/01/2014 to 30/06/2014: £929.57" (1)

"SC Schedule 2 – for the period 01/01/2014 to 30/06/2014: £29.34" (1)

"Major works – Boiler 2014 for the period 01/01/2014 to 30/06/2014: £3,504.82" (2)

" Arrears as at 23/12/2013: £35,076.16"

(1) - Total: “£958.91” (US$1,691) - with the addition of "the boiler: £3,504.82" = "£4,463.73"

Whereas the preceding demand of 16.08.13 (# 13, above) did not provide any information whatsoever, with this one, it is back to the approach used for the 16.02.11 demand (# 2, above) and 12.01.12 demand (# 5, above): providing a list of items with “their global cost” – and specifying “Schedules (while changing the name from “service charge estimates” to “Budget report”. Lucky me!

The "Budget" states that:

  • “[my] yearly contribution for Schedule 1 is £1,859.13” (US$3,278);
  • “[my] yearly contribution for Schedule 2 is £58.68” (US$103);

thereby bringing – as it stands - the total for 2014 to “£1,917.81 (US$3,382).

(NB: I was right to write 'as it stands' - as - nearly 2 years later - the 08.10.15 demand (# 28, below) added a further - lump sum - of £172.96 to the demand, bringing the total "for 2014 to £2,090.78").

Relative to the yearly 2011 (# 2, above) and 2012 (# 5, above) “service charge estimates of £3,467.68” (US$6,115) - that have NOT been "adjusted" – it represents a reduction of £1,377.68 or 40% less.

The "Budget" states:

  • Total Jefferson House SC Schedule 1 – 2014: £107,340.19” (US$189,272)
  • Total Jefferson House SC Schedule 2 – 2004: £3,000” (US$5,290)

- which makes a total of “£110,340.19” (US$194,562)

That is truly fascinating when compared to the 16.02.11 (# 2, above) and 12.01.12 (# 5, above) “service charge estimates” that each claimed a yearly amount “£196,850” (US$347,104).

A reduction of £86,510 (US$152,542), or 43.95% less.

Contrary to that mafia’s sadistic expectations, I am not going to waste my time comparing the amounts claimed – where the information is available – as my above overview, including graphs - very clearly demonstrate that its demands since the 1st one of 16 Feb 11 are works of fiction i.e. (among others): FRAUD.

The total demanded in the 23.12.13 demand is "£39,539.89" (US$66,433).

     
 
  • - on which the mafia would focus, conveniently overlooking the HUGE amounts in between (more proof of this, 3 years later, in 2016 - see # 33 below), as well as its failure to provide legally required lease-compliant accounts throughout the period (e.g. # 15, above);
  • (2) - my 'apparently' ever-growing negative amount of "electricity consumption" (# 14, above, and # 18, below);
  • (3) - the 27.01.14 'reminder' to which the long-threatened "penalty charges" (e.g. Jun 11) have been added for the 1st time (# 19, below);
  • (4) - the time period: 3 years;

...- suggest (in the light of events to date) (CASE SUMMARY ; RÉSUMÉ DE MON CAS) the obvious guess:

The mafia is cooking its next attack:

Planning on using the barbaric 3-year requirement to - unlawfully - file for forfeiture (copy of definition) against me;

by dragging me, yet again, through, one of its evidence-and-rule-of-law-blind-courts - and, this time, FINISH ME OFF.

The plan rests on Ladsky's anticipation / agreement with his judiciary lapdogs that they will grant him forfeiture of my apartment for "non-payment" of his endless fraudulent demands...

...- while portraying him as "the victim", and me as the dishonest individual who "does not want to pay" - (as his lapdogs in the Kensington police mafia captured in their so-called "crime report"...

...- IN SPITE of my providing the police and judiciary with a mountain of evidence proving that it was NOT true e.g. my 10.06.02 s.10 Notice under the Data Protection Act and covering letter, and my 19.07.11 Metropolitan Police Service Witness Statement).

And, counting on this - Ladsky's henchmen in Kensington police:

  • have already ensured that he has the key to my apartment: My Diary 17 Jan 14;
  • attempted (I presume with the help of mates in GCHQ) to delete my website in order to prevent me from reporting, in the public domain - my being UNLAWFULLY dispossed of my leasehold apartment by the British state: My Diary 3 Feb 14.
 
     

The undeniable endorsement of my assessment as to the Ladsky mafia (and devoted supporters within the 'Brotherhood') (typically) sinister, Machiavellian plan - and of my conclusions in my 10.02.14 document (# 19, below):

its only response (and that of its "arslikhan" supporters in the British state) - has been to dish out an ever growing number of reprisals (# 28, below)...

... - concurrently with the Martyn Gerrard mafia not only repeating the fraudulent demands (# 22) - but also adding to them (from # 24).

(2) - "Boiler: £3,504.82" (US$6,180) - I do NOT owe, as I paid for it, etc, in 2003 - see Notices 2 of 5.

Further: it is based on a "1.956%" share of the service charges - which was my share prior to the addition of 4 apartments - see # 2, above.

It appears that "the boiler" was replaced in May-Jun 14 (Notices # 6) i.e. 12 years after the claim by Brian Gale, MRICS, that "[it had] reached the end of its useful life" - thereby providing further proof of the fraud that took place.

Of course, it is not stopping the mafia from asking for yet more money (Notices # 6.1)!

Back to sections

 

(18)- 27.01.14 unsupported demand "for electricity" - making it the 7th unsupported demand - and my 'apparently' 'using an even greater negative amount of electricity'.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

The following, about the 27.01.14 demand includes my adding calculations due to the lack of provision of data. (See above summary for my comments about the "electricity" demands).

 

27.01.14

My estimates

 

This makes it:

  • the 3rd one that continues with the trend of 'my apparently using' an ever growing negative amount of electricity (# 14, above, for the previous 2).

 

I repeat my comments under e.g. # 17, above.

Period

15Oct-20Dec13

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

13.46

25.82

VAT 20% (£)

NO (unlike # 4 above)

 

Total (£)

13.46

 

Previous reading

NO detail of units

 

Present reading

NO detail of units

 

Units (calculated)

(20)

67

Days (calculated)

67

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

Climate levy per unit (£)

0.0048

 

Unit cost + levy (clctd) (£)

0.1418

 

Daily standing charge (£)

0.2435

 

Cost stdg chrg (clcltd) (£)

16.31

16.31

Cost units (Total - std chrg) (calculated) (£)

(2.85)

9.50

Cost climate levy (above)

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

(0.300)

1.000

Back to sections

 

(19)- Version 5 - I conclude, planning on using the 3-year requirement to - illegally - file for forfeiture (copy of definition) against me, the multi-criminal racketeers sent me a 27.01.14 'reminder' for £39,900 (US$70,400) - to which they added "£90 penalties for non-payment" of? YES! ALL the fraudulent demands since Jan 11.

'Reading' their plan, in this 10.02.14 document I challenged all the demands. (They never acknowledge it).

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

(Re. 'fraudulent': I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary)

27.01.14 from Martyn Gerrard's "Accounts"

"Statement of account for Ms N Y S Klosterkotter-Dit-Rawé" (1)

"Statement prepared on 27/Jan/2014" "Relating to property: 3 Jefferson House 7-13 Basil Street London" (1)

"Brought forward balance

£32,502.23" (2)

"01/01/2013 Service charges

£1,136.97" (3)

"01/07/2013 Service charges

£1,136.96" (4)

"14/09/2013 Ground rent (24/06/2013 - 24/12/2013

£300.00" (5)

"01/01/2014 Ground rent (25/12/2013 - 23/06/2014)

£300.00" (6)

"01/01/2014 Service charges

£4,463.73" (7)

"27/01/2014 Administration fee for chasing outstanding

£60.00" (8)

"27/01/2014 Late payment charge

£30.00" (8)

"Full balance at end of period

£39,929.89"

(1) The mafia getting ready to put that in an application for forfeiture (copy - definition of 'forfeiture') - in one of its evidence-and-rule-of-law-blind-courts? (# 17, above)

(2) See # 9, above ; (3) See # 9, above ; (4) See # 13, above ; (5) See # 13, above ;

(6) See # 16, above ; (7) See # 17, above ; (8) See below

     
 

27.01.14 "Request for payment" from Martyn Gerrard's "Accounts"

"Re: 3 Jefferson House 7-13 Basil Street London"

"Net"

"VAT"

"Gross"

"27-01-2014 Administration fee for chasing outstanding

50.00

10.00

£60.00"

"27-01-2014 Late payment charge

25.00

5.00

£30.00"

 

75.00

15.00

 

"Total amount

   

£90.00"

"Arrears as at 27/01/2014

   

£39,839.89"

"Total amount due

   

£39,929.89"

 
     

That mafia is charging me for "non-payment" of:

its fraudulent "service charge" demands since Jan 11 - that are in blatant breach of my Lease (and of legislation);

the ground rent - while (in addition to its ongoing numerous breaches of my Lease), it ignores my correspondence asking for proof of the identity of 'my lessor' - as defined in my Lease.

Absolutely unbelievable! (For reasons for this conduct, see below, Breaches of statutes).

NOTE also the following in the 27.01.14 'reminder':

   
 

PLEASE MAKE CHEQUES PAYABLE TO : “MARTYN GERRARD

Please note payments not received within 14 days will automatically incur a Late Payment charge of £30.00. Each and every time it is necessary for us to chase payment you will incur a further Administration cost of £60.00

 
     

Having evidently noted that failure to provide a so-called 'notice of rights' with the demand for 'administration charges' allows the tenant to ignore the demand (Schedule 11 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002) - the mafia also sent a 'notice' - which contains (as defined by secondary legislation), the following:

"(2) An administration charge is an amount which may be payable by you as part of or in addition to the rent directly or indirectly—

in respect of your failure to make any payment due under your lease..."

...it very clearly opted to ignore - as explained on this page.

How come that the ruffians did not also include ' the outstanding electricity charges'?

Because they were looking forward to adding to their - and supporters' sadistic kicks - by counting on my being unable to figure out their scheming - and continue to complain about the demands?

Oh Dear! Better luck next time!...as Andrew David Ladsky told me on 25 Jan 03 (when he knew that he had HM's London tribunal in his pocket) (one of many!).

The trigger to this 27.01.14 'reminder' by the mafia?

in support of its plan, and to add to the punishment i.e. criminal psychological harassment, as well as its sadistic kicks - in this ‘reminder’, the Ladsky mafia finally implemented its repeated threats of “Administration fee: £60.00” (US$106) and “Late payment charge: £30.00” (US$53).

   
 

Having, for a long time, concluded that the Andrew David Ladsky mafia was cooking its next attack (# 17, above) - and having got the evidence to place the noose very tightly around its neck - that would send others straight to prison...

...- I replied to ALL its demands in this ('Special Delivery Next Day') 10.02.14 document.

With this I enclosed a £514.34 (US$907) cheque for - my calculated amount of electricity - and NO other sum.

I also submitted a Notice under the Landlord & Tenant 1985 to determine - as per my rights - the identity of my lessor. Of course, in breach of legislation - it did not reply.

It never acknowledged my document (*) - nor did it cash my cheque within the 6-month statutory limit.

In fact, its only response (and that of supporters in the British state) - has been to dish out an ever growing number of reprisals (# 28, below)...

...- concurrently with the Martyn Gerrard mafia not only repeating the fraudulent demands (# 22) - but also adding to them (from # 24).

This endorses - undeniably - my conclusions in the document, as well as my above assumption as to its (and supporters') (typically) sinister, Machiavellian plan.

(*) Like it never replied to: (1)- my 07.02.12 letter on the same subject: # 5, above; (2)- my 07.07.11 letter about the MRJ demand to which it has since been adding: # 3, above.

 
     

Concurrently, I continued to ignore the mafia's perverse "Census form" - it sent for the 3rd time with its 27.01.14 "electricity" demand (# 18, above) - because I did not comment about it on my website, and the very sick psychos were missing their sadistic kicks.

(They sent:

  • they then repeated it a 4th time, with their 31.03.14 demand - # 20, below - and subsequently proved that I was correct in my assessment).

Content of the "CENSUS FORM" the Martyn Gerrard mafia expected me "to complete" - demonstrating that it and psycho Rachman Andrew David Ladsky were looking to add to their sadistic kicks

"Landline"

Ladsky disconnected my landline in my apartment in 2005.

"Mobile"

Ladsky's henchmen in the Kensington police mafia have, a long time ago, provided him with my mobile numbers - with which they / mates at GCHQ interfere (Persecution # 3.1).

"Email address"

Ditto, through his henchmen in the police and at GCHQ, Ladsky has not only been given my email address - he has also been given the email address of, at least, some of my contacts - in order to set-up plants,...

... and doing this as a joint operation with the local police mafia: My Diary 6 Aug 12 ; Summary use of plants - Persecution # 2.8.

"In the event that the owners are unavailable please provide an alternative contact for access to your property like a relation, family friend or key holding company" - for which it asks for the "Name" and "Contact details". (1)

The 10.01.14 letter from Jon Wolbrom, MRIPM, states:

"...must ask you in the interest of safety that you complete the form...This is to ensure that in the event of an emergency, rather than having to force entry into your property [2] if there was an emergency, we would have ways in contacting an alternative key holder or indeed yourself." (3)

(1) - Rachman vermin Ladsky knows that, in my 26.07.05 letter to his then "RICS regulated" puppet, Joan Hathaway, then MRJ, I asked - and paid - for 2 extra keys for the front door to the Jefferson House 'concentration camp' (so that I could give them to my family, and they could come in, in case I need help) (My Diary 22 Jul 05). I never received them.

(2) - 1 week after posting my above 10.01.14 document, on 17 Jan 14, Ladsky / his mafia came into my apartment to throw a lot of water on my bathroom floor...

...- demonstrating that Ladsky HAS been given the key to my apartment - BY my "security-lock" supplier, BANHAM (My Diary 17 Jan 14).

In fact, in the light of the extremely sick, perverse psyche of the Ladsky mafia, I conclude that by the time it first sent the form with the 02.12.13 demand (above) - Banham had just given it the key to my apartment.

Further, 2 weeks later, on 31 Jan / 1 Feb 14, having found - yet again - another very sick flunkey, the Ladsky mafia posted a letter to me - intended to cause me fear, as well as add to the criminal psychological harassment - that refers to "a landlord smashing in the door of a tenant" (My Diary 3 Feb 14).

(3) - As to "contacting [me]": as I report under Persecution # 2 - operating as a fully integrated team - Ladsky's 'dogs' and thugs and his police henchmen are tracking me, hounding me, etc. - on a daily basis - including:

  • (1)- having my movements monitored when I am using one of my ex. uni's libraries (a near daily occurrence) (as evidenced by e.g. by the timing of many of the attacks by the 'Luftwaffe' (Persecution # 2.4));

Further, they are also bugging my apartment - concurrently with Ladsky's in-house sentinels reporting on my movements (Persecution # 3.5).

In other words: the satanic (*) criminal vermin (*) has me permanently under surveillance.

(*) I repeat my Comments under Persecution (1)(4)

I contend that any human being with a minimum of humanity and decency who considers the content of this section, as well as the remainder of this page – HAS to come to the conclusion that these rapacious monsters redefine many concepts, among others:

In fact, to me, based on my religious beliefs, these monsters are more than evil: they are satanic. (I repeat my Comments under Persecution (1)(4))

I also repeat my comments in the Introduction.

Back to sections

 

(20)- Part of the reprisals for my 10.02.14 document (# 19, above): a 31.03.14 demand by Roshane Dias using a made-up "share" of a made-up "3-month electricity budget for Jefferson House" - amounting to charging me twice. Extended over the year, it represents a 166% increase over the previously issued, also made-up, "yearly budget".

Also, my conclusion as to the perverse intent of the "Census form" proved to be accurate.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

The first thing to note is that there is "no separate meter relating to the electricity charged for the common parts" - as stated in e.g. the "1993 accounts".

Of course, the ICAEW-endorsed lapdog, Errington Langer Pinner fails to highlight this fact in its so-called "accounts" ("2012", # 15, above ; "2013", # 24, below ; "2014", # 28(2), below) )

1. The 3-month "budget"

As part of the reprisals (# 28, below) for my 10.02.14 document (above, # 19)...

...the racketeers drew up a "BUDGET REPORT - 3 Jefferson House - Electric - for the period 21 DEC 13 to 20 MAR 14" (1) - stating:

"Total – Jefferson house Electrics (21/12/2013 – 20/03/2014)

£1,967.21"(2)

(US$3,470)

Your contribution (0.5815%) (3)

£ 11.44"

(US$20)

(1) - (i)- Post the end of the period, the mafia stills calls that a "budget"; (ii)- a "budget" for 3 months of electricity!...

...when, in fact, it has already issued a "Budget" for the whole of 2014: 23.12.13 (# 17, above) - for which it "budgeted: Communal electricity: £3,000.00" (US$5,300)

(2) - Interestingly, this latest '3-month- budget' suggests that the total 'communal electricity' for year 2014 'will be' "£7,978" (US$14,068) (£1,967 for 90 days = £21.85779 per day ; £21.85779 x 365 days = £7,978) = a 166% increase over the 23.12.13 "budget"!

The previous "Yearly estimates of electricity charges for the communal parts of Jefferson House" - since Martyn Gerrard took over the 'management' of the block:

  • 2014 (23.12.13) - # 17, above): £3,000

Or, visually:

Isn't that fascinating!?!?!

A 67% reduction between 2011 and 2014!...

....although, as calculated above - in yet another "BUDGET", 3 months after the start of the year - it 'could be' £7,978 (US$14,068) for year 2014.

 

It really is whatever that multi-criminal vermin (I repeat my Comments under Persecution (1)(4)) dreams up on a particular day - aided by the above fact.

Taking over from the then Martin Russell Jones in 2011 cannot be used as an excuse, as: Martyn Gerrard would have got the file + Andrew David Ladsky knew. Further, it could have been rectified for 2012.

Just as well that Clause 2(2)(c)(ii) of my Lease states:

"The lessor will use its best endeavours to maintain the annual service charge at the lowest reasonable figure consistent with the due performance and observance of its obligations"

(3) - "Your contribution (.5815%)"

As discussed e.g. under Comment # 2, above, under header # 2, (and on pages 6 & 7 of my 10.02.14 document to Martyn Gerrard - above, # 19) - two percentages have been used by the mafia in claiming "service charges": 1.956% and 1.732%.

Hence, the "0.5815%" is (yet again) another invention.

2. The fraudulent "electricity" demand

31.03.14 "Request for payment"

"Re. Jefferson House - Electric 7-13 Basil Street London

Net

VAT

Gross"

"21-12- 2013 - Electrics 21/12 - 20/03 - for the period 21/12/2013 to 20/03/2014 (1)

11.44

0.00

11.44"

"Total amount

11.44

0.00

11.44"(1)

"Arrears as at 31/03/2014

 

 

481.94"(2)

"Total amount due

 

 

493.38"

(1) - See above, the "Budget report"

The start period of "21 Dec 13" follows on from the 27.01.14 demand - that covers the period from 15 Oct to 20 Dec 13 (# 18, above).

As can be seen from the above summary (and under header 1.3 of my 10.02.14 document to Martyn Gerrard) - the previous demands link up all the way back to the 09.07.10 demand for 14 Apr - 8 Jul 10 from the then MRJ.

As is glaringly obvious - these demands refer to my apartment - NOT to the communal parts.

Hence: the shysters are deliberately mixing up 'the electricity for the block' with "the electricity for my apartment".

This demand is (additional) reprisal (# 28, below) for my 10.02.14 document.

The mafia's objective is to also add to its sadistic kicks in anticipation that I would spend time explaining it. (However, its evilness has, yet again, backfired, as I had previously omitted to include the above note).

Further, as this 31.03.14 demand spans "21 Dec 13 to 20 Mar 14" - in addition to breaching my Lease - ...

...the racketeers are also (continuing) to commit breaches of:

AS:

  • they have already asked me one part of the £11.44 in the 16.08.13Request for payment” (# 13, above),
  • and the other part in the 23.12.13Budget report for the period 1 Jan to 31 Dec 14” (# 17, above)

This is in addition to, likewise, continuing to commit breaches of:

(2) – “Arrears as at 31/03/2014 - £481.94

As can seen in the above summary (and detailed under header 1.3 of my 10.02.14 document), at the time of the last demand of 27.01.14 (covering up to 20 Dec 13) (# 18, above) the claimed “arrears” amounted to “£561.31

I stress: contrary to the claim of “arrears as at 31/03/2014” – by the time of this 31.03.14 demand - I had not received a demand since the 27.01.14 demand.

WITH my 10.02.10 ('Special Delivery Next Day') document, I sent a cheque for £514.34 (# 19, above). Within the statutory 6-month limit, it had not cashed it.

The mafia never acknowledged my document. (I repeat my Comments under # 19, above).

Of course, in their covering letter, the racketeers repeat their previous sociopathic comments!

3. The "Census form" - sent for the 4th time

The ‘Census form’ enclosed with the 31 Mar 14 correspondence makes it the 4th time that Martyn Gerrard is sending it.

The previous 3 are covered under # 19, above - under which I stated that the psychos were clearly having a laugh, as they already have the information.

Proving it – add to their sadistic kicks – 2 weeks after sending it for the 4th time, a ‘Marta’ (Jon Wolbrom’s letter of 10.01.14) left a message on my mobile on 16th April asking me to “call [her]”. She repeated this c. 2 weeks later.

Further, and of greater importance, I conclude that, since at least early Dec 13, the mafia has been provided with the key to my apartment 'courtesy' of my "security-lock" provider, Banham (My Diary 17 Jan 14).

THESE THOROUGHLY EVIL MONSTERS ARE SICK BEYOND WORDS.

(I repeat my comments in the Introduction).

Back to sections

 

(21)- Providing additional evidence of the fraud that took place in 2002+, "the boiler" (that had, in 2002, "reached the end of its useful life") appears to have finally been replaced 12 years later.

The mafia took this opportunity to add to the criminal psychological harassment by enlisting the help of the contractor, Lynton Services Mayfair (1994), and of my (then) local PO Box provider.

See Notices # 6 - that include:

(Previous events, that started, more than 3 years previously with a 16.02.11 'notice' "for renewal of boilers and overhauling of central system" are covered under Notices # 4 and # 5).

As already reported above: Having already got the money in 2002-04 (e.g. 29.08.06 letter to me from the ICAEW) is - of course - not stopping the mafia from asking for yet more money (Notices # 6.1)

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

Back to sections

 

(22)- Having failed, more than 4 months on, to acknowledge my 10.02.14 document (# 19), in their 16.06.14 demand for ground rent, the multi-criminal psychos repeated their 27.01.14 demand (with Jon Wolbrom MIRPM, having previously done it in his 03.04.14 psychological harassment letter " for the boiler": Notices # 6.1).

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

(NB: 'MIRPM' = Member of the Institute for Residential Property Management = another one of those!)

16.06.14 "Request for payment"

"Re: 3 Jefferson House 7-13 Basil Street London

Net

VAT

Gross"

"16-07-2014 - Ground rent (24/06/2014- 24/12/2014)

300.00

0.00

300.00"

"Total amount

300.00

0.00

300.00"(1)

"Arrears as at 16/06/2014

 

 

39,929.89"(2)

"Total amount due

 

 

40,229.89"

(1) - On 25.06.14, I placed the £300.00 in the special account (# 5, above) - bringing the total to £2,400 (US$4,232) (+ £3.50 interest). (Summary ground rent, above)

(2) - This a repeat of the 27.01.14 'reminder' (# 19, above) - that led me to write the 10.02.14 document challenging the demands, and with which I enclosed a cheque only for my calculated amount of electricity.

Hence: having failed to acknowledge my ('Special Delivery Next Day') document, (and to cash my cheque) - more than 4 months later, the racketeers continue to ignore it. (I repeat my Comments under # 19).

Of course - the demand is followed by the usual threat of "penalties for non-payment"...

...while the covering letter repeats the previous psycho comments.

These evil monsters are sick beyond words. (I repeat my comments in the Introduction).

Back to sections

 

(23)- Surprise, surprise: 5 months since the major flooding of my apartment on 18 July 14, followed 3 days later by a visit by the porter, Pawel Smiglelski - NOT a word from Martyn Gerrard - who also failed to respond to the 22.08.14 letter from my insurer's loss adjusters...

proving that it was, of course - yet more (by then the 9th time)- deliberate criminal damage to my apartment.

I conclude that this major flooding, (just before midnight, to add to the criminal psychological harassment), was carried out (as I told him), by the porter, Pawel Smiglelski - and that he could not resist to come and have a look at his handiwork.

(Of course, the silence has continued ever since).

What unbelievably sick, satanic, criminal vermin (*)

The financial cost to me? In the hundreds of £s - and a lot of my time e.g. My Diary 15 May 15.

(*) I repeat my Comments under Persecution (1)(4)

But, the mafia got a bonus: it led me to set up a YouTube account on which I placed the videos...and a lot more since.

Back to sections

 

(24)- Version 6 - Sasha Vrba sent me some 'Christmas presents':

(1)- a 22.12.14 "Request for payment" of £40,816 (US$72,000) - to which "arrears" are added in spite of failing to send me a demand for the '2nd half of 2014';

(2)- so-called "2013 service charge accounts" that are (again) not compliant with my Lease - and, by implication: fraudulent;

(3)- an 18.12.14 credit card receipt for "£300 ground rent" - with "Kind regards" - implying falsely that Gerrard used my card.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

(Re. 'fraudulent': I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary)

(1) of # 24 - 22.12.14 "Request for payment" of £40,816 (US$72,000)

"Request for payment"

"Re: 3 Jefferson House 7-13 Basil Street London

Net

VAT

Gross"

"01-01-2013 - Service charge adjustment, year-end 2013, Sch 1 - for the period 01/01/2013 to 31/12/2013

-229.22

0.00

-229.22 "

'01-01-2013 - Service charge adjustment, year-end 2013, Sch 2 - for the period 01/01/2013 to 31/12/2013

-143.12

0.00

-143.12"

"Total amount

-372.34

0.00

-372.34"(1)

"Arrears as at 22/12/2014

 

 

41,188.79"(2)

"Total amount due

 

 

40,816.45"

(1)- As I am not wasting my time to look at the - by implication: fraudulent - so-called "2013 accounts" (below) to see whether they 'might' explain the reductions...

...- I just draw attention to the fact that the total demanded "for 2013" was: £1,136.97 (# 9) + £1,136.96 (# 13) (in both instances, without any supporting data...to this day) = £2,273.93

Amazingly, "the revised amount for year 2013 is now £1,901.58" (US$3,350) (£2,273.92 - £372.34)

Contrast that with the £3,468 demanded in the previous 2 years (# 2 and # 5)

What a mafia! (see also # 33, below)

(2)- The first thing to note is that - 10 months on - the "RICS and ARMA regulated" Martyn Gerrard continues to ignore my 10.02.14 ('Special Delivery Next Day') document (# 19, above). I repeat my Comments under # 19.

I have not been provided with information on how the sum of £41,188.79 (US$72,630) is arrived at as:

  • the last demand was the 27.01.14 'reminder' for £39,989.89 (# 19), that was followed by
  • the 16.06.14 demand for ground rent, in which the same amount was repeated (# 22)

I did not receive a demand for the second half of 2014. (Part of the reprisals (# 28, below) for my 10.02.14 document).

Relative to these last two demands, this latest one represents an increase of £1,258.91 (US$2,200). For what?

I ASSUME: "£958.91 for the 2nd half of 2014" - as the 23.12.13 demand stated a demand of "£958.91 for 1Jan-30Jun14"(# 17) - and £300 for the Jun-Dec 14 ground rent (02.12.13 demand - # 16).

Back to sections

(2) of # 24 - The - by implication - fraudulent so-called "accounts for 2013" produced by the ICAEW-endorsed lapdog, ERRINGTON LANGER PINNER

The so-called "Service charge statement for 2013 [also described as] "service charge accounts", produced again by ERRINGTON LANGER PINNER, yet again for an unnamed party - are, like those it produced "for 2012" (# 15), not compliant with my Lease...

...- thereby implying, yet again, that they are also fraudulent - and in relation to which it yet again LIED by claiming that it "followed TECH 03/11".

HENCE: as in the case of the previous "accounts", I am not wasting my time looking at them - and repeat ALL of my other Comments under # 15 - as they apply equally.

Overall conclusion: continuation of the ICAEW-endorsed lapdog, Errington Langer Pinner, acting in cahoots with the Ladsky mafia to add to the criminal psychological harassment regime through, among other, provocation (Header 4).

Back to sections

(3) of # 24 -"Ground rent received - 3 Jefferson House - Kind regards"

   

This was, very clearly, yet another attempt by the "RICS and ARMA regulated" evil vermin (*) Martyn Gerrard to cause me more anguish and distress - by aiming to demonstrate that - without my knowledge - it could just help itself on 'my credit card'.

The ploy failed, as I could see that the numbers did not match up.

Of course, it had not sent me a demand for the ground rent - as legally required.

Oh well, as 'somebody' paid for it: I do not owe it!

Guess what? Because I had reported this evidence, to save face, 1.5 years later, the sociopaths sent me a 08.08.16 'reminder' showing: "Rent received £300" (!!) (see # 33, below)

However, the psycho racketeers were not going to leave it at that.

Two months later...they included the demand (I had not received) in the pack sent by shyster Mark Wagner with his 19.10.16 illegal letter (# 34, below).

(*) I repeat my Comments under Persecution (1)(4)

Back to sections

(4) of # 24 -The legal implications of the above:

The mafia is continuing to commit breaches of:

Yep! = Yet more "contributions from Jews"! Gosh, am I 'blessed'!

Back to sections

 

(25)- Another "contribution" from the extremely sick, multi-criminal, "RICS, ARMA et.al. regulated" sociopaths: a 03.02.15 letter from Gavin Putney AIRPM informing me that "a party wants to replace the [10 year old] lift"...

- and, whilst it is paying for it, "Martyn Gerrard will put its project management fee of £19,549 [US$34,470] on the service charges".

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

The 03.02.15 letter from Gavin Putney AIRPM - stating:

"We have received a request from an interested party into replacing the lift at Jefferson House." (1)

"They have offered to fund the project in full...We feel...the site will benefit from a brand new lift [1] and associated equipment. The project will cost close to £200,000 to complete."

"The only cost to the service charge will be our fees for managing the project [2] which we estimate to be £16,290.16 + VAT." (3)

"The individual is quite keen to move this project forward so I ask you to put forward any objections in writing to me by Friday 20th February 2015" (4)

(1)- "replacing the lift" - It is only 10 years old.

(2)- "The only cost to the service charge will be our fees for managing the project"

The blatant objective of this statement is criminal psychological harassment through provocation (Header 4)

This cost is part of "the project cost", and must therefore be paid by "the interested party".

(3)- "our fees...£16,290.16 + VAT" With the addition of 20% VAT: £3,258.03 = £19,548.19 (US$34,470).

(4)- "objections in writing by 20th February 2015" -

Translation: we'll make sure to ignore as:

  • More than one year on, we are still ignoring your 10.02.14 ('Special Delivery Next Day') correspondence, that also includes a statutory notice (# 19) re. the identity of your landlord, preceded by
  • ignoring your 07.02.12 letter asking for proof of identity of your landlord (# 5), preceded by
  • ignoring your 07.07.11 letter in which you raised the issue about the £24,000 demand from MRJ (# 3)

OF NOTE:

As can be seen from the envelop (for the above letter): while Martyn Gerrard's franking states 3 Feb 15, the letter was posted from Windsor - on 10 Feb 15 = BY Andrew David Ladsky (1)...

...proving that - of course - this Rachman vermin (2) is still involved - in spite of the claim to the contrary made by his other criminal "arslikhan" puppet - the porter, Pawel Smiglelski - on 21 Jul 14.

(1)- I submit that it was also the objective of the 'posting' antics: in 2011, I determined that Ladsky has / had a residence near Windsor - as I discussed e.g. under Portner and Jaskel # 14, and My Diary 6 Aug 12.

(2)- I repeat my Comments under Persecution (1)(4)

Back to sections

 

(26)- Gavin Putney AIRPM signalled having more 'fun' in store: his 27.03.15 "Notification of major works during the summer" at the 'concentration camp'...

- of course, in the totally unactionable format (CLRA s.151) dictated by the sacrosanct landlord lobby to its flunkies in Parliament...

followed, 19 months later, by a near repeat in the 27.10.16 "notice" from Jeremy Doran MIRPM

See Notices # 7

At the time of the 27 Mar 15 "notice", I wrote: 'Perhaps, as in the case of "the boiler", this "Notice" will be resurrected in 2.6 years time - Notices section # 4 to section # 6.

Well, instead of 30 months, it is (so far): 19 months.

What happened to Jon Wolbrom MRIPM and Gavey Putney AIRPM?

(NB: 'MIRPM' = Member of the Institute for Residential Property Management = another one of those!)

= Also another example of the absolute sheer utter hell of being a leaseholder:

You never know what the landlord and his henchmen and henchwomen are going to dream of demanding from you from one day to the next.

Back to sections

 

(27)- Having failed to send a demand "for electricity" for a 6-month period, next were two unsupported demands by Roshane Dias: 10.07.15 and 05.10.15 - making them the 8th and 9th unsupported demands...showing my 'apparently' 'using an even greater negative amount of electricity'.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

The following includes my adding calculations due to: no demand, as well as lack of provision of data. (See above summary for my comments about the "electricity" demands).

 

NO DEMAND

My estimates

10.07.15

My estimates

05.10.15

My estimates

Period

21Dec13-16Jul14

 

17Jul14-24Jun15

 

24(!)Jun15-30Sep15

 

Demand/ My estimates (£)

22.57 (estimated)

80.14

49.31

132.16

16.81

38.14

Previous reading

No detail of units

 

No detail of units

 

No detail of units

 

Present reading

No detail of units

 

No detail of units

 

No detail of units

 

Units (calculated)

(198)

208

(241)

343

(51)

99

Days

208

 

343

 

99

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

0.1370

 

0.1418

 

Daily stdg charge (£)

0.2435

 

0.2435

 

0.2435

 

Cost stdg charge (£)

50.65

50.65

83.52

83.52

24.11

24.11

Cost units (£)

(28.08)

29.49

(34.21)

48.64

(7.30)

14.04

Cost climate levy (£) (incl. above)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

(0.952)

1.000

(0.703)

1.000

(0.520)

1.000

I did not receive a demand for the period "21 Dec 13 - 16 Jul 14"...other than the fraudulent 31.03.14 demand for the block (# 20, above)

Hence, my estimates are based on even more assumptions on my alleged usage of electricity (I had to start making from the 17.07.12 demand (# 6, above) = more than 3 years ago) - by using the totals in the previous and subsequent demands.

As can be seen from the above graph, the period for the 'no demand' represents the highest amount (so far) of my alleged 'negative use of electricity: minus 0.95 per day!

It makes these two demands the 8th and 9th unsupported demands ("electricity" summary, above)

Back to sections

 

(28)- Version 7 - Continuation of the reprisals (summary) for my 10.02.14 document (# 19, above):

(1)- no demand for ‘the 2015 services charges’ - but the "arrears" in the 08.10.15 demand have been increased by £2,872.24 (US$5,065);

(2)- a lump sum increase in “the 2014 service charges” - without stating the "schedule/s";

(3)- “2014 accounts” that are (as previously) not compliant with my Lease.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

(1) of # 28 - 08.10.15 "Request for payment"

"Request for payment"

"Re: 3 Jefferson House 7-13 Basil Street London

Net

VAT

Gross"

"01-01-2014 - ADJ Y/E 2014 for the period 01/01/2014 to 31/12/2014 [1]

172.96

0.00

172.96 "(2)

"Total amount

 

0.00

172.96"

"Arrears as at 08/10/2015

 

 

43,688.69"(3)

"Total amount due

 

 

43,861.65"(3)

(1)- Continuation of the Ladsky mafia's ever growing reprisals (summarised below) for my 10.02.14 document (# 19, above) (it never acknowledged) - by making it even more difficult for me to challenge how much it is - fraudulently (*) - charging me:

in this new approach - making it version 7 - it does not state the "schedule/s" to which it applies (unlike "for 2013", in the 22.12.14 demand (# 24, above)) (which was the first such "adjustment" - as discussed under # 2, above).

BUT...as these "schedules" have never been explained to me - now making it 8 years since I first asked (# 2, above) - as it stands, it makes no difference.

(Note that my question on the impact on my share of the service charges of the addition of '4 apartments', including a massive penthouse remains likewise unanswered 8 years later (# 2, above)).

(*) I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary

(2)- The "2014 annual service charge" was £1,917.82 (£958.91 x 2): 23.12.13 demand for Jan-Jun 14 (# 17, above) - plus my assumption of the same amount for the 2nd half year - as I did not receive a demand (also part of the reprisals for my 10.02.14 document).

"The total for 2014 is thus £5,595.60" (US$9,870) - made up of: "service charges: £1,917.82" + "£3,504.82 for the boiler" (# 11, # 17, ad nauseam) + "£172.96 adjustment".

(3)- Following my not receiving a demand for the 2nd half of 2014, I then did not receive any 'estimates for 2015' (again: part of the reprisals for my 10.02.14 document).

Hence, since the 23.12.13 demand (# 17, above) that stated "service charges for the period January to June 2014" - none of the subsequent demands have specified the amount attributed to "service charges".

The 22.12.14 demand (# 24) stated "Arrears of £40,816.45". In this demand, they are stated as "£43,688.69 [US$77,000] as at 8 Oct 2015". The difference is "£2,872.24" (US$5,065).

What do the "£2,872.24" represent?

"The service charge for 2015" - as I have not been asked to pay for ground rent - as legally required - since the 16.06.14 demand (# 22, above )). Of course, the amount was nonetheless included in the "arrears": # 33, below.

At the time, I wrote: of course, it may be that the "total amount due" includes more of the mafia's "Administration fees" and "Late payment charges" - as it had, by then, included in its 27.01.14 demand (# 19, above).

I was right! See # 33, below.

   
 

YEP! My ('Special Delivery Next Day') 10.02.14 document (# 19, above) - that has not been acknowledged - really did 'upset' - big time - the 'Jewish' Andrew David Ladsky gang of racketeers,...

...and the other assassins: its "arslikhan" supporters in the Jewish-Freemason Brotherhood who had no doubt been providing advice on the moves by the bunch of criminal ruffians, Martyn Gerrard, brought in in early 2011:

'make the Nazi bitch go through hell for 3 years, then we'll finish her off by forfeiting her lease' (copy of definition of forfeiture).

(They were so sure of their success that, among other:

  • in Feb-Mar 14, the British state attempted to delete my website: My Diary 3 Feb 14).

Indeed, since my document, the reprisals have (so far - at end Aug 16) included - in chronological order:

  • (5)- 8 May 14 - causing what was, by then, the 6th malicious escape of water in my apartment: Notices 1 of # 6;
  • (7)- Also with the aim of making it even more difficult for me to challenge how much the mafia is - fraudulently charging me - failing to send a "service charge" demand "for the 2nd half of 2014" - ditto about Sasha Vrba nonetheless adding subsequently to the "arrears": 1 of # 24, above.
  • Also proving that it was criminal malicious flooding: Martyn Gerrard did not reply to the 22.08.14 letter from my insurer's loss adjusters.
  • Well, the mafia got a bonus: it led me to set up a YouTube account on which I placed the videos... and a lot more since.
  • (9)- From Sasha Vrba, an 18 Dec 14 £300 credit card receipt for "Ground rent received - 3 Jefferson House - Kind regards" - falsely claiming that Gerrard had used my credit card: 3 of # 24. (To save face, 1.5 yrs later, the shysters claimed they had "received payment": # 33, below);
  • (10)- Year 2015 - again with the aim of making it even more difficult for me to challenge how much the mafia is - fraudulently charging me - failing to send me " estimates" - while Sasha Vrba nonetheless added to the "arrears": above, Comment # 3.
  • (11)- 03.02.15 letter from Gavin Putney AIRPM that Martyn Gerrard "will put [its] £19,549 management fee on the service charges" "for the replacement of the [10 year old] lift" - even though the replacement is at the behest of just "one party": # 25, above;
  • (13)- Mid-2015 - failing to demand the ground rent for '23Jun - 24Dec15' - while nonetheless adding it to the "arrears": above, Comment # 3;
  • (14)- "For year 2016", sending yet again a new version of the demands (making it version 8); among others: list of "leaseholder contribution per flat" with some missing, and a new one added; (deliberately) 'miscalculating' the sums claimed from me; 3 addresses for 'the landlord' (continued thereafter): # 30, below.
  • - on the day of my departure, it ensured I received this 27.05.16 demand stating only the addition of "£90 penalty charges" "for non-payment of £45,506" - # 32, below.
  • (18)- Continuing to send so-called "accounts" that are not compliant with my Lease = by implication: fraudulent: 2013 (# 24(2), above), and 2014 (below) - and concurrently continuing to add to the demands: # 33, below.

Needless to say that, in breach of statutory requirements, the mafia never replied to my Notice under the Landlord & Tenant Act 1985 to determine the identity of 'my landlord' - I attached as the last page of my 10.02.14 document.

Also of NOTE: to discredit my 10.02.14 document - and this page - the racketeers are (typically) feeding the following extremely vicious and slanderous lies to those only too happy to swallow whatever they are fed:

  • "[I] owe the service charges claimed";
  • "The problem is that [I] do not want to recognise that [I] must pay service charges that cannot be specified in advance".

Oh! apparently, I am also "enjoying challenging the demands" (!!!)

The above script is based on the conversation I had with one of the mafia's scum on 12 Oct 15 (see My Diary).

And the action by shyster and sole practitioner Mark Henry Wagner will 'add to the truth of these claims'.

ADD to that Andrew Ladsky's equally evil and criminal henchmen in the Kensington police mafia who have libellously been disseminating the same malicious lie against me since 2003 to more than 50,000 people - in their so-called "crime reports".

Concurrently:

The absolute confirmation that the other assassins, Her Majesty's ministers and other MPs, as well as her police et.al. continue to very actively endorse and support the Ladsky mafia's criminal conduct:

(1)- my 25.11.14 letter to Theresa May, then Home Secretary (Home Office # 3(3)(4)) – copied to David Cameron, then Prime Minister - et.al. (= 19 letters – I sent twice, two weeks apart = 38 letters, each sent under separate post)…

…as their only ‘response’ has been a continuation of the persecution by the police and related agencies.

(2)- the 'response' to my 24.07.16 letter to 'the faith leaders', including Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis, and Archbishop Justin Welby - et.al., and 24.07.16 letter to Alison Saunders, Director of Prosecution - who all claimed to "condemn hate crimes" (My Diary 27 July 16) - was a 08.08.16 'reminder' from Gerrard for £47,241 - # 33, below.

Reason? Because they are 'Jews'...who make 'such a great' "contribution to this country" = shower Her Majesty's government with large amounts of money - allowing them to act in complete disregard of the law of the land?

Also of NOTE: in early Oct 15, a Katie Morgan commented in relation to three of my videos on YouTube - while failing to take any of the evidence into account, as well as suggesting a link with Ladsky.

Handily for the parties concerned: Ladsky and the police - the videos selected happen to be particularly damning - starting with the title.

The comments are clearly targeted at the same type of audience as those aimed at discreditingmy 10 Feb 14 document, as well as this page.

WOW! The Ladsky mafia and its Jewish-Freemason 'brothers' are sure going out of their way to attempt to discredit my irrebutable evidence!

What will be next?

For sure, these racketeering, vampiric monsters will keep at it - relying, as always, on their "arslikhan" lapdogs in the British state,...

in particular the so-called 'law enforcers': police and judiciary - to provide all manner of assistance.

 
     

(2) of # 28 - The - by implication - fraudulent so-called "accounts for 2014" produced by the ICAEW-endorsed lapdog, ERRINGTON LANGER PINNER

Not referred to in the 08.10.15 covering note (unlike e.g. in the 22.12.14 note).

As these so-called "accounts" have the same characteristics as the so-called "accounts" "for 2012" (# 15, above) and "for 2013" (# 24) - I repeat ALL of my comments under these entries.

Note that I have not received Lease-compliant (but unverified) accounts since the 1993 accounts = more than 20 years ago!

Hence, I am not wasting my time looking at them - other than note that Martyn Gerrard is apparently demanding payment - from the Jefferson House leaseholders - of the sum of £15,000 (US$26,500)...to inflict its criminal activities!

Back to sections

 

(29)- Having failed to send a demand for ground rent for the previous 6 months (Jun-Dec15), in their 02.12.15 demand, the ruffians decided to include one for the next 6 months - using this opportunity to state: "Arrears: £43,862" (US$77,340) = continuing to ignore my 10.02.14 document.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

"Request for payment"

"Re: 3 Jefferson House 7-13 Basil Street London

Net

VAT

Gross"

"01-01-2016 [???] - Ground rent (25/12/15 - 23/06/2016

300.00

0.00

300.00"

"Total amount

300.00

0.00

300.00" (*)

"Arrears as at 02/12/2015

 

 

43,861.65"

"Total amount due

 

 

44,161.65"

(*) Paid into 'special account' on 06.01.16

In relation to the "24 Jun - 25 Dec 15 ground rent" - the ruffians included the demand - (I had not received) - in the pack sent by shyster Mark Wagner with his 19.10.16 illegal letter (# 34, below).

Back to sections

 

(30)- Version # 8 - The "2016 service charges" of "£2,670" (US$4,740) (deliberately) 'miscalculated' in the 21.01.16 and 05.07.16 demands by Stuart G Burchell AIRPM; not split between "schedules"; new additions of:

(1)- "leaseholder contribution per flat", with some apartments missing, and a new one added; (2)- a breakdown of the "reserve fund";

3 different addresses for 'the landlord' (continued thereafter) - making it the 5th version

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

(1) of # 30 - 21.01.16 demand

"Request for payment"

"Re: 3 Jefferson House 7-13 Basil Street London

Net

VAT

Gross"

"Reserve fund 2016 - for period 1Jan-30Jun16

194.63

0.00

194.63" (1)

"Service charge 2016- for period 1Jan-30Jun16

1,150.19

0.00

1,150.19" (2)(4)

"Total amount

1,344.82

0.00

1,344.82" (3)

"Arrears as at 21/01/2016

 

 

44,161.65"

"Total amount due

 

 

45,506.47"

(1)- Making its first time appearance, the "Reserve fund breakdown" - totalling "£22,500" (US$44,080) - lists a number of items.

(2)- The "Anticipated service charges" is a list of items, each with a global amount - "totalling £155,470" (US$274,140) - adding "£22,500 reserve fund" brings the total (so far) "for 2016 to £177,970" (US$313,810).

There is no longer a split between "schedule 1 and schedule 2" - unlike e.g. in the 16.02.11 demand (above, # 2). What was under "schedule 2": gas and boiler, is now part of the items. The "schedules" were last referred to in the 22.12.14 demand (# 24, above).

Of what was under "schedule 1": some items have disappeared: "gardening and legal fees", while others have been lumped together; one new item "cleaning" has been added.

(I presume the latter relates to the company that every so often vacuums the corridors. (The porter, Pawel Smiglelski, used to perform this task. Evidently, it is now 'beneath him', following his demonstrating being 'worthy' of the status of 'mafia's henchman' for the block e.g. demonstrating his skills at criminally flooding my apartment (My Diary 18 July 14 ; 21 July 14 ; YouTube video)...in addition to being a sentinel).

I presume that another part of the "cleaning cost" is for the company that occasionally hoses down the windows with water).

Reason for the disappearance of the "schedules" (that were last referred to by Gerrard in its 22.12.14 demand (above, # 24)? Of course: it has not been communicated to me. But then, nor has an explanation as to their meaning - 8 years after my first raising the issue (pages 6 & 7 of my 10.02.14 document to Gerrard). I repeat my comments under # 2, above.

The amount stated for my apartment under "Leaseholder contribution per flat" is "£2,689.63" [US$4,740] for 2016". On this basis, the "half year contribution" 'should be' £1,344.82 (US$2,370).

Yet, the demand is for "£1,150.19" i.e. £194.625 less (US$300) - which is the same amount as "the half year amount for the reserve fund" ("1.73% of £22,500" = £389.25 for the year"; half = "£194.625 for 6 months.

(3)- Following on from my above comment: the amount "for the first half year 2016 service charges" is (deliberately) 'miscalculated' by "£194.63" i.e. 'should be' "£1,539.44".

(The same thing was done in the 05.07.16 demand).

(4)- "Leaseholder contribution per flat" is a new addition. It is the outcome of my reporting e.g. under # 15, above, that I have not had Lease-compliant accounts since the '1993 accounts' (although, I did not have them verified).

Of course, in doing this, the racketeering ruffians are taking the opportunity to add to their sadistic kicks.

Relative to e.g. the list supplied by Andrew David Ladsky-MRJ in their 07.08.02 application to the then London LVT (LVT Intro):

  • The individual percentage "shares" have all been reduced within a range of -0.23 to -4.90 percentage points.
  • These apartments have now been combined, stating a “share of 11.94%” (the sum of their original share is 16.844%).
  • The penthouse is the apartment that was “categorically not going to be built”, “because it was not a viable proposition” (see 'Major works' # 2)
  • 36 Jefferson House” is a new addition; well it is the first time that this is communicated to me. Amount: “.5%”. What is this meant to represent? The area in the entrance corridor assigned to ‘the porter’?
  • (Apartment 21, where the porter resided, was sold by Ladsky e.g. LR BGL37920. In breach of the Lease, a substitute was not provided). And/or does it account for the lower ground floor toilets used by the porter?

Also of note: 3 apartments have ‘disappeared’ / get away with not paying anything: # 18A – LR BGL56546 ; 33A – LR BGL56358 ; 35A - LR BGL56122. (See 'Major works' # 1).

Might there be a connection with the major works that took place between Oct 14, and at least, Mar 15 – in relation to which Kensington & Chelsea Planning replied, in its 23.03.15 letter to me, that

there has not been a breach of planning control in this case? (Planning applications from # 4))

But, perhaps I should "Shut up! [because I am] not a councilor"

The “landlord’s address

Desperate as ever to add to their sadistic kicks, the extremely sick, perverse sociopaths are now giving 3 addresses:

  • (1)- Jefferson House;
  • (2)- 89 Claude Road – without, of course, giving a post code (there are 3 ‘Claude Road’ in London – in E(ast) 10, E(ast) 13, and S(outh) E(ast) 15); (it will add to the psychos’ kicks to know I have looked it up);
  • (3)- 197 Ballards Lane (the location that issues the fraudulent demands).

The previous demand e.g. 02.12.15 (# 29, above) only gave the address as "Martyn Gerrard House, 197 Ballards Lane, Finchley, London N3 1LP".

This latest version represents the 5th version since Martyn Gerrard took over in 2011. Indeed, I have had:

  • (1)- no address (and no name) for the landlord for e.g. the "service charge estimates" demands of 16.02.11 and 12.01.12 (# 2 and # 5, above); 04.01.12 demand re. “electricity” (# 4);
  • (2)- "Head lessee:- Rootstock Overseas Corporation, Edificio PH Plaza 2000, Calle 50, Apartado 6307, Republic of Panama, address for service in the UK c/o Martyn Gerrard estate agents" e.g. 16.02.11; 12.01.12; (*)
  • (3) - "Rootstock Overseas Corp, C/o Martyn Gerrard House, 197 Ballards Lane..." e.g. 17.07.12 (# 6);
  • (4)- After "a transfer of the freehold by Rootstock Overseas Corp to Greyclyde Investments Ltd" (16.08.13 letter to me from Saul Maurice Gerrard) (Yes: “Rootstock Overseas Corp”, “the head lessee”, had mysteriously transformed into “the freeholder”) - I have had “Greyclyde Investments Ltd, Martyn Gerrard House, 197 Ballards Lane...”.

Providing 3 addresses has continued in the subsequent demands.

(*) I do not know whether Andrew David Ladsky had also set that one up through Mossack Fonseca - as he did for 'Jefferson House Ltd' and 'Steel Services'.

(2) of # 30 - 05.07.16 demand

Same as above - except that it states:

  • "Arrears as at 05/07/16: £45,896.47"
  • "Total amount due: £47,241.28" (US$83,300)

Back to sections

 

(31)- "Electricity" demands of 12.02.16, 07.07.16, 05.09.16 and 10.11.16 that includes two - bringing the tally to 15 unsupported demands - with the last two changing the trend over the previous 8 demands - to 'a positive use of electricity'

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

 

12.02.16

My estimates

07.07.16

My estimates

05.09.16

My estimates

Period

30Sep15 (shld be 1Oct)-11Feb16 = 134 days (1)

 

12Feb-6July16 = 146 days (1)

 

7Jul-1Sep16 = 57 days (1)

 

Demand/ My estimates(£)

29.25

51.63

18.81

56.25

14.26

21.96

Previous reading

No detail of units

 

No detail of units

 

 

 

Present reading

No detail of units

 

No detail of units

 

 

 

Units (calculated)

(24)

134

(84)

146

3 (2)

57

Days

134

 

126

 

57

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

0.1370

 

0.1370

 

Daily stdg charge (£)

0.2435

 

0.2435

 

0.2435

 

Cost stdg charge (£)

32.63

32.63

35.55

35.55

13.88

13.88

Total cost units (£)

(3.38)

19.00

(16.74)

20.70

0.38

8.08

Cost climate levy (£) (incl. above)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

(0.178)

1.000

(0.809)

1.000

0.047

1.000

 

 

10.11.16

My estimates

10.11.16 (3)

My estimates

Only 'demand' is one line in a summary

Period

2Sep-4Oct16 = 33 days (1)

 

5Oct-2Nov16 = 29 days (1)

 

Demand/ My estimates(£)

12.21 (2)

12.71

19.61 (2)

11.17

Previous reading

No detail of units

 

 

 

Present reading

No detail of units

 

 

 

Units (calculated)

29

33

88

29

Days

33

 

 

 

Unit cost (£)

0.1370

 

 

 

Daily stdg charge (£)

0.2435

 

 

 

Cost stdg charge (£)

8.04

8.04

7.06

7.06

Total cost units (£)

4.17

4.68

12.55

4.11

Cost climate levy (£) (incl. above)

 

 

 

 

Daily units (calculated)

0.892

 

3.052

1.000

(1)- Note the variations in the number of days covered. The longest period has been 343 days (Jan 12 and July 15 demands).

(2)- After the previous 8 demands (from 15.08.13 onwards, # 14, above) amounting to claiming that I used 'a negativity amount of electricity' - there is a turn in the trend: "3 units used"! - followed by

(i)- very close to my estimate, and then (ii)- 3 times the amount.

(3)- Hoping to catch me out, and contrary to they stated in the covering letter, the racketeers only included the demand as the last line in a summary; hence, no demand apart from that.

Back to sections

 

(32)- 27.05.16 'reminder' - for £45,506 (US$80,240), plus "£90 penalty charges for non-payment" - with the obvious help of Her Majesty's very sick and "fantastically corrupt" assassins in the police and related agencies - timed to arrive on the day I left for an overseas holiday;

26.05.16 ground rent for Jun-Dec 16

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

(1) of # 32 - 27.05.16 'reminder'

"Request for payment"

"Re: 3 Jefferson House 7-13 Basil Street London

Net

VAT

Gross"

"27-05-2016 - Admin fee for chasing

50.00

10.00

60.00"

"27-05-2016 - Late payment fee

25.00

5.00

30.00"

"Total amount

75.00

15.00

90.00"

"Arrears as at 27/05/2016

 

 

45,506.47"

"Total amount due

 

 

45,596.47"

"£90 penalty charges"...for "non-payment" of the fraudulent demands!

The racketeers first did this in their 27.01.14 demand (# 19, above). In fact, by the time of this demand, they had already done it in 2015 (see # 33, below).

This demand adds yet more evidence that Her Majesty’s very sick and “fantastically corruptassassins in the police and related agencies, including GCHQ (Persecution # 4.3), continue to operate hand in glove with the Ladsky assassins – acting as their “arslikhanlapdogs:

  • this demand, posted 1st class (the first ever use of 1st class post by Martyn Gerrard since its first correspondence in 2011), was delivered on 28th May 16 - day of my departure for a two-week holiday in France, to visit my family and friends;
  • the goons knew about my trip, as I had arranged it through emails (ALL my means of communications are monitored and interfered with by the British state since at least 2005 - and include unlawfully reading my emails:

Why send this now - and on its own – supported by extracts from legislation?

The objective was to add to the criminal psychological harassment, hoping to worry me whilst I was away (my life-destroying, horrendous experience with Her Majesty’s corrupt courts since 2002: kangaroo courts – added to forfeiture legislation) = ruin my holiday.

(2) of # 32 - 26.05.16 ground rent

For good measure, the assassins also sent the £300 ground rent demand, for "24Jun-24Dec16" - one month before - and stating "arrears £45,506.47"; "Total amount due: £45,806.47".

To add to the objective discussed under # 1 above, they sent it by separate post, timed to arrive on the same day. Best to have 2 letters from them arrive on the day of my departure: it's more fun!

I placed the amount in the special account on 04.07.16 - after my return from overseas; see Summary of ground rent, above.

Back to sections

(33)- 08.08.16 - Another 'reminder' (the 3rd one)! For £47,241.28 (US$83,300) - that: finally, 1.5 yrs later, provides 'some information' "for year 2015"; fraudulently adds more than 3.5 yrs of "ground rent" to the 4 yrs I do not owe.

It is 'the reply' to my 24.07.16 letter to Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis, Archbishop Justin Welby - et.al., and 24.07.16 letter to Director of Prosecution Alison Saunders - who ALL claim to "condemn hate crimes"

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

For sure, the trigger to this ‘reminder’ was my 24.07.16 letter to Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis, also sent to Archbishop Justin Welby - et.al.

I also sent a 24.07.16 letter to Alison Saunders, Director of Prosecution, because, around the same time, she claimed, like all the others to "condemn hate crimes" = cue to laugh out loud, as 'the response' was this 'reminder' - followed by another 'response' (# 34, below).

In addition to 'reminding me' that (like the rest of the Andrew David Ladsky gang of multi-criminals) Martyn Gerrard has across-the-board protection from the "fantastically corrupt" Establishment,...

I view the other objective as aiming to communicate to its et.al. arslikhancorrupt flunkeys and lapdogs - who, of course, do not want to look at the very damning evidence - that ‘the demands are perfectly’ reasonable’.

For example, in addition to Mark Wagner (# 34, below): the scum on 12 Oct 15 who regurgitated to me the slanderous story he had been fed: “Surely, [I] must understand that [I] have to pay service charges that cannot be specified in advance”).

In addition to communicating their 'displeasure' by re-sending the: 26 May 16, 27 May 16 and 5 July 16 demands, the ruffians also sent a list of 53 items – that refer to “service charges” only from 2013.

The first two items on the 53-item list are:

  • 21/03/2012- Balance B/F: £26,402.23”; (1)
  • 21/03/2012- Ground rent B/F- £5,500”.

The sum of these items is £31,902.23 - same as the 12.01.12 demand (# 5, above), 2 months earlier.

Item 3 of 53 is the 17 July 12 £300 demand for ground rent, and 4th is the 7 Dec 12 £300 ground rent demand.

(1)- Thus, NOT detailed are the 16.02.11 (# 2, above) and 12.01.12 (# 5, above) “service charge” demands + the 23 Jun 11 ground rent.

As items 5 to 22 of the list refer to the 11.01.131st half-year 2013” demand (# 9, above) – WHY NOT do the same for these demands?

When you look at this graph (printscreen) - you can see why. The 2011 and 2012 demands are particularly outrageous.

This - yet again - confirms these multi-criminal racketeers' intended, very sinister Machiavellian plan: # 17 and # 19, above.

(2)- The racketeering vultures took the cover-up further - by fraudulently adding more than 3.5 years of "ground rent" to the 4 years I do not owe.

Pre Martyn Gerrard, the ground rent (that was not asked by the then Martin Russell Jones) - and which I do not owe was £2,400 - (see the note at the beginning of the above GR summary).

I presume that the claimed “Ground rent B/F of £5,500” includes Gerrard's demands of 16 Feb 11, 23 Jun 11 and 12 Jan 12 (my summary) - as they are not referred to anywhere.

Hence, the "Brought forward" of £5,500 is not trueby £2,200 (US$3,880) (£5,500 - £2,400 - £900 (the 3 Gerrard demands) = £2,200).

Note that, having been caught as their own game, in Dec 14, by sending me “a credit card receipt for £300 ground rent for 25Dec14 – 23Jun14” (# 3 of 24, above)...

- to save face, the psychos deducted £300 ground rent - claiming, under item 38 of 53 “Rent received: £300.00”. In fact, as part of the cover-up, the dates are wrong, and the item should be item # 35.

However, the psychos were not going to leave it at that - see below, # 34.

Items 39 to 44 of 53 relate to the “2015 service chargesthe racketeers never sent me.

Hence, they waited 1.5 years to supply 'some information'; so much more fun to do that! It reveals that the demand is ‘composed of:’

Item #

Description

Amount

 

39

“Reserve fund 2015

£194.63”

 

40

“Service charge

£1,076.50”

 

41

Late payment charge

£30.00

(Yep! another one!)

42

“Ground rent – 24Jun15 - 24Dec15

£300.00”

 

43

“Reserve fund 2015

£194.62”

 

44

“Service charge 2015

£1,076.49”

 

The “service charge” demand “for year 2015” is thus (as it stands) £2,152.99 (£1,076.50 + £1,076.49) + £389.25 (£194.63 x 2) = £2,542.24 (US$4,480) – without, of course, providing any detail.

Excluding “the boiler” (£3,504.82) (# 11, # 17 and ad nauseam), the (‘final’) “service charges for 2014” were “£2,090.78” (“£1,917.82” + “£172.96 adjustment”). Hence, relative to "year 2014", "year 2015" represents a £451.60 (US$800) increase, or +21.6%.

And, relative to "year 2013" of £1,901.59, an increase of £640.74 (US$1,130), or +33.7%.

As to the “late payment charge of £30”: ‘perhaps’ as the shysters did not send a demand, they opted to exclude a “£60 admin fee for chasing payment” (by 2015)?

Re. the “£300 ground rent”: it was not asked - as legally required. However, see # 34, below.

Back to sections

 

(34)- The second 'reply' to my 24.07.16 letter to Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis et.al. was this 19.10.16 correspondence from shyster and sole practitioner Mark Henry Wagner, Wagner & Co, illegally demanding payment of ALL the demands and threatening me with prosecution...

followed by a 14.10.16 impending "claim for unpaid ground rent"

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

Yep! the racketeers found a shyster and sole practitioner Mark Henry Wagner - only too happy to join the mob of assassins - see Advisors # 5A for detail.

Of note:

(1)- having sent me a 'credit card receipt' "for 25 Dec 14 - 23 Jun 15 ground rent" (# 24(3)), followed by saying that they had "credited the amount" (# 33) - in the pack enclosed with his 19.10.16 letter, Wagner included...yep! a demand!

(2)- having failed to send me a demand for the "24 Jun - 25 Dec 15 ground rent" (# 33) - in the same pack, they also included a demand = 16 months later!

As it is still within the statutory limit, I paid the amount into the special account.

As to the 'impending claim', it materialised: 21.12.16.

Back to sections

 

(35)- Fury at my website and summaries updates, and probably in connection with the claim, led Martyn Gerrard to send me a 15.11.16 demand for "25 Dec 16-23 Jun 17 ground rent"; hence: 6 weeks before the date in my Lease.

(See summaries, above: (1) "Service charges" ; (2) "Non-payment penalties" ; (3) "Electricity" ; (4) Ground rent ; (5) Overall summary)

Asking for it 6 weeks before the date in my Lease: something to do with the claim in order to confuse the issue about the "confirmed payment" of the 25Dec14-23Jun15 ground rent? (# 33, above)

Of course, in the demand, it took the opportunity to state: "Arrears as at 15/11/2016": £47,241.28"

I am not placing in the special account until due.

 

********

Breaches of statutes by Martyn Gerrard and its puppet master, Andrew David Ladsky - amounting to numerous criminal offences.

 

In my - NON-LAWYER - opinion (*) I hold the view that the above amounts to BREACHES - by Martyn Gerrard and its puppet master, Andrew David Ladsky and whoever might be hiding with him behind the offshore shell companies - under:

  • s.13(1)- "Direct discrimination";

To the above are added the breach of:

(*) However: I most strongly contend that it does NOT require being a lawyer, or a genius, to see that. (Re. the Fraud Act and Theft Act s.17 False accounting. I repeat my comments under the "service charges" summary

BUT, as very blatantly demonstrated by the fact that:

(1)- I first reported the above breaches of the law on this page in early 2011 i.e. in the public domain;

(2)- the Martyn Gerrard mafia continues to pile on the breaches of these Acts...

...- it very clearly does not give damn i.e. most definitely considers itself to be above the law of the land - with no worry about sanctions.

WHY? Because:

(1)- as 'retribution' for 'my daring', in this "fantastically corrupt" environment, to stand up to organized crime - Martyn Gerrard appointed itself as henchmen and henchwoman - operating with the full support and assistance of 'my victims' in the British state - in particular the police;

(2)- it knows that Jews have control over the British state.

This was, yet again, confirmed following my 24.07.16 letter to, among others, Chief Rabbi Ephraim Mirvis who claimed to 'condemn' "hate crimes" (My Diary 27 July 16).

Also, because as Jews, what they do is perceived as making a 'great' "contribution to this country"...which they 'perhaps' view as "Doing God's work"?

 

  C O M M E N T S

Back to top