Email this site to a contact
Ongoing persecution by the British state, Andrew David Ladsky and his gang of racketeers - and many others among their army of henchmen and henchwomen - ALL because Ladsky decided he was 'entitled' to make a multi-million £ jackpot at my expense (and that of my fellow leaseholders)
|You are here > Home > Persecution
|(If the linked documents within the PDFs do not open, try with Internet Explorer:
|If Internet Explorer does not go to a specific part of a page on my website i.e. does not link to an anchor:
In the Internet Explorer browser, select Tools, then 'Compatibility View settings'.
Under 'Add this website' enter: 'leasehold-outrage.com' and click 'Add').
(2)- Persecution: 'surveillance': unlawfully dogged, hounded, harassed, persecuted, etc. - on a daily basis - since at least 2002 - as though I were a terrorist - as well as using plants to act against me
(4)- Blatant, ongoing abuse of power by the British state - in total disregard of legislation - leaving me with nowhere to turn to for help and protection
(1) - Objectives of the psychological harassment
With the objective of avoiding exposure and /or as 'retribution', organized crime uses criminal psychological harassment by placing its victims on the psychological defensive in order to take advantage of them - by weakening them psychologically, physically, financially and socially.
The ultimate objective is the destruction of their victims - in order of 'preference':
- (1) - Death through suicide, from depression, feeling of hopelessness (e.g. campaigner). (In the past - I also considered this option e.g. My Diary 20 Aug 06 ; HMCS # 4 , # 5 , Portner # 3).
- (3) - Their victims being no longer able to cope psychologically (for which, as evidenced by my experience - using plants - they test 'the level of progress' e.g. My Diary 3 Apr 10 ; 17 Apr 10 ; 13 Feb 13) - at which point (assuming it does not lead to # 1, above), they pounce on them, get them locked-up (sectioned) in a mental institution - and therefore at their mercy.
- (As evidenced by the detail comprised under the 'Secret Prisoners' entry – I emphasise ‘at their mercy’). As also demonstrated by my experience, on 7 May 08, if their victims seek medical help, they jump on the opportunity, by attempting to get them locked-up.
- In fact, their standard tactic is to portray anybody who 'dares' stand-up to them / threaten to expose them as 'suffering from mental issues'.
- (4) - Their victims driven to the point of doing something that provides the opportunity to put them in jail - and hence, likewise, at their mercy (e.g. Maurice Kirk; Norman Scarth) (The case of James Best provides an example of both: the ridiculous excuse used for putting somebody in Her Majesty's Prisons, and the very dire treatment prisoners can be subjected to).
(2) - Tools used
To achieve the above, they rely on a massive network of participants who use a variety of tools, intended to cause a permanent state of fear, anxiety, distress, panic, and stress in their victims
- BY: attacking their victims’ credibility, integrity and self-image ; portraying them as suffering from psychological disorder ; attacking them physically, as well as verbally ; hounding them, harassing them, persecuting them ; making them spend - in vain - their lifetime savings, fighting off the attacks ; ostracizing them ; isolating them from their family and close friends, as well as socially, etc....
...- AND, in doing this, know that, in this island-Kingdom, they can rely on an absolute guarantee of a conspiracy of silence, and hence, complicity (as very amply demonstrated by my case).
Many of these tools are intended to cause a fight-or-flight response – with anger being the preferred reaction because of the negative effects it has on their victims’ health. Sustained attacks can then lead to feeling of hopelessness, and hence, surrender. These tools can be summed up as: physical and psychological damage strategy.
(3) - The Stasi model
Looking at my experience (and that of others, including the use of blacklists), and contrasting it with what the Stasi did and how it operated - leads me to the conclusion that the corrupt elements in 'the Brotherhood' and their massive army of henchmen, lackeys and flunkeys, including Andrew David Ladsky and his gang of racketeers - have adopted the 2 key elements in the Stasi model:
(1)- Psychological harassment
Called: ""Zersetzung" – a term borrowed from chemistry which literally means "corrosion" or "undermining". Tactics employed under Zersetzung generally involved the disruption of the victim's private or family life." (Header 1).
Reported to be used by the Stasi, especially from the 1970s, when its methods of operating contradicted with the image it was trying to project.
As demonstrated by events, this tactic is also the key tool used by the Andrew David Ladsky mafia.
(2)- Very large scale, highly intrusive surveillance
In a report, the House of Lords described this country as having "the most pervasive surveillance system in the world".
As discussed under My Diary 2008, Orwellian Surveillance Britain, reflecting the advance in technology since the days of the Stasi, in addition to the hundreds of 1000s of official and unofficial informants (as demonstrated by my below experience, and other examples, there is no shortage of helpers, and especially tormentors) - the British state (among many others):
It is also capturing the world's phone calls, the content of e-mails, and internet users' access to websites.
(An ex. MI5 Chief was reported in the media as saying: "We now have more to fear from our police state than from terrorism". Like Michael Mansfield, QC, said: "With the Met [Metropolitan police], if you are innocent you have everything to worry about").
In the case of Andrew David Ladsky, he has had me dogged, stalked, hounded, harassed and persecuted since at least 2002 - which included doing it himself e.g. 7 Mar 02.
Such is the perfect match between the British state's and Ladsky and his gang and support network's method of operating that, for a long time now, they have been operating as a fully integrated team - as demonstrated by the examples contained on this page.
(2) • Attempting to scare me from challenging repeated fraudulent 'service charge' demands (Header 1.7) by e.g.
(1) - Ladsky filling a 2003 false complaint against me with the ('very obliging') Kensington police that, typically, added to it liberally.
(2) - The Ladsky gang sending malicious, threatening letters: 1st examples; 3rd example - as well as a 27.01.03 letter 'from' Chelsea police, that threatened me with "further consequences" if I 'dared' challenge 'Dear Mr Andrew Ladsky';
(3) - The Ladsky racketeers proceeding with filing a 2002 fraudulent claim against me - followed (so far) (from 2013 the mafia has been preparing another attack) by another, equally fraudulent claim in 2007;....
(4) - combined with other forms of harassment e.g. (i) - having a death threat delivered to me in Jun 09: "Enjoy your life. You don't have long to live", and an implied death threat on 14 Jun 14 (video and photos) ;
(ii) - undertaking numerous other actions intended to make me fear for my life, including driving cars straight at me (see also # 16, below). (Experience of others, e.g. Comment # 13: "Violence and physical threats against other leaseholders were common");...
... (iii) Ladsky and his accomplices making 20 anonymous phone calls to my home, several at work, as well as intimidatory phone calls at work.
(3) • Taking steps to destroy my credibility, defaming my name, character and reputation, by attacking my integrity and self-image; ridiculing me, etc. (Headers 1.5 , 1.6 , 1.17 , 1.18, # 4) e.g.
(1) - The Ladsky gang portraying me - falsely: (i) - to a tribunal and courts, as somebody who defaults on her contractual obligations, and as a liar, etc. - and repeating, as well as adding to these false accusations in their other malicious correspondence;
(ii) - to my website Host, as making defamatory comments about Ladsky on my website.
(2) - Police - (i) - totally unsupported - 2007 e-mails to my website Host that portrayed me - falsely - as "having committed a crime", "a Nazi" and an "Anti-Semite" - "because of my franco-german (sic) origin" - (while never contacting me at any point in time);...
... (ii) - holding - totally unsupported - criminal charges against me in so-called "crime reports" that are packs of lies (the most hilarious (and extremely sickening): describing Andrew David Ladsky as "the vulnerable victim" 'I' "intimidate") - against which it denied me the right to defend myself;...
... (iii) - the 2007 "crime report" - that also portrays me as "extremely paranoid" and as "suffering from mental issues", 'because', "on [my] website [I] report being followed by either the police or Ladsky. This is not the case" (see below for the reality);
(note that the covert objective is to also portray me as representing 'a risk' to Ladsky i.e. provide 'another reason' for getting me sectioned); for many years, these "crime reports" have been circulated to more than 50,000 people;
...(iv) - under statements of truth, dismissing ALL of my claims as "misconceived and unfounded"; in the process, portraying me as a liar and, consequently, as an individual who committed contempt of court, as well as an imbecile;...
... (v) - subsequently, continuing with the same contemptuous, arrogant, dismissive conduct, by ignoring repeatedly my defences: QB # 1 , # 4...
- my Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) Witness Statements: 19.07.11 ; 29.08.11 ; my 17.10.11 Appeal Request against the pack of lies 09.08.11 MPS Order 'from' Master Eyre (with my Comments) (Overview # 18);
(3) - Queen's Bench Division, dismissing ALL of my blatantly obvious - legitimate - claims against the police, by regurgitating the Met Commissioner's outrageous lies, and stating that
"[my] action against the Met Commissioner amounts to no more than a most obvious attempt to re-write history, and is completely devoid of merit".
And, continuing to endorse this position - including my having to pay... the police's costs - YES! my 22.08.11 letter making a £8,478 payment.
(4) - The courts that hold documents about me, including Orders - accessible by the public - that are packs of lies.
(5) - The London tribunal - by placing, since 2003, on its online, public database, a 17.06.03 report, as well as a so-called 'summary of the case' (copy with my Comments) that falsely and wilfully portray me as being "responsible for the delay [IT caused] in dealing with the 07.08.02 Application", and a fictitious "[6%] cost increase" - and failing to take action in the light of my request.
(6) - Ladsky's letter of 26.03.07 to my then employer, KPMG (# 3.5), portraying me as "undoubtedly". displaying clinical paranoia from making allegations that [I have] been followed 24/7 for several years over a £5000 bill "
[NB: Actual amounts: (i)- £14,400 in 2002 ; (ii)- £14,400 in 2004 ; (iii)- £10,350 and £8,993 - 1 month before his letter] ; and, in one of his phone calls to KPMG, that I was "clinically unwell".
(4) • Weakening me financially by dragging me repeatedly through the courts / forcing me to issue proceedings to defend my name and reputation - combined with the judiciary deliberately, and repeatedly denying me justice and redress -
..and, concurrently, having fun, including with the court staff, by falsely and deliberately claiming that: some proceedings concerned me ; a judgment had been entered against me ; making me miss a hearing, at which an Order "staying" the action against me was issued, in spite of knowing that it had been settled;...
...sending me a blackmail letter masquerading as an order ; delaying deliberately sending me Orders ; "cancelling hearings" that had never been intended to be held, etc., etc., etc.
(6) • From the time Andrew David Ladsky decided he was 'entitled' to make a multi-million £s jackpot at my expense (and that of my fellow leaseholders):
leaving me with absolutely nowhere to turn to for help, from being ostracised by the state and the professions making it abundantly clear to me that they ALL perceive me as a piece of dirt, a non-entity who does not have the right to have rights, there to be used, abused, and tormented at will - by ALL - thereby denying me ALL forms of protection and support (of course, while nonetheless taking a large part of my income to pay for them):
(1) - The state-sector - my experience with e.g. the police, Home Office, courts and tribunal, council, 'my' MP, 'regulators' and 'complaints departments' - including, among others:
(i)- the Court Service 'Customer Service'; (ii)- Parliamentary Ombudsman;
(iii)- Local Government Ombudsman; (iv)- the then Legal Services Ombudsman; (v)- the police past and current complaints bodies -...
...and, in the process, also treating me as a liar and / or an imbecile, etc., etc.; the outcome if I had approached (as I was expected to) the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, etc. - and, parties - across the sector - immediately informing Ladsky of the correspondence I have sent.
(2) - The lawyers: (i) - batting for Ladsky - and using an arsenal of fear and harassment tactics in the pursuit of their objectives; (ii) - batting for KPMG - by, after 3 weeks, and having obtained information from me, claiming "conflict of interest"; (iii) - complying with the wishes of 'the Brotherhood' by not contacting me.
(3) - The medical profession: also batting for 'the Brotherhood'.
(4) - The 'regulators' of the professions which, as with the state sector's, typically dismissed ALL my - legitimate - complaints by also deliberately misrepresenting them and totally ignoring the evidence (the 'Frustrate and Discourage Game' - header 2) and, in the process, also treated me as a liar / an imbecile - countless examples of this e.g.
(i)- Law Society and Legal Services Ombudsman re. CKFT ; (ii)- RICS re. MRJ - combined with, also, attempts to send me from pillar to post.
(7) • Using 'subtle' and not so 'subtle' attacks - Aimed at making me feel vulnerable and insecure, these attacks entail data that is personal and sensitive to me (Headers 1.8 , # 4) e.g.
(1) - My post: (i) - withholding a letter, to make me miss my Uncle's funeral; (ii) - stealing my financial statements and other post, and delaying other post - and the Royal Mail blaming my PO Box provider; (iii) - the Royal Mail PO Box 'service' failing to hold my post; giving me items that were not for me, and thereby giving mine to 'others', etc;
(2) - My e-mails - ditto about interception of important e-mails, including about my Uncle's funeral.
(3) - KPMG ensuring that its threatening 14.12.07 letter would be intercepted by Ladsky (KPMG # 10.1);
(4) - The Pension Service: (i) - claiming that it "lost [my] Birth Certificate"; (ii) - paying me only half of the Winter Fuel Allowance, claiming 'confusion' "because another claimant also uses the same delivery service" - and being "unable to guarantee that it will not be repeated in future".
(5) - Virgin Money assuring me repeatedly over several months that it would retain all my financial statements, and had "marked the records as such" - while nonetheless sending them / some of them (some were intercepted); in spite of my complaints, 12 months later, it was still continuing to mess me around.
(6) - [Revenue & Customs].
Other attacks e.g. (1) - Mobile phone companies - in collusion with 'the Brotherhood': (i) - the then 02 company that: (a) withheld a message about my Uncle's funeral; (b) disconnected my phone for several weeks;
(ii) - Hutchinson 3G, the previous mobile phone company had: (a) made me go into a 4-month battle to finally be able to switch to another provider (that very quickly 'got on board') and, in the process, deprived me of the use of my phone; (b) ensured that a bogus message, intended to worry me, was sent to my phone.
(NOTE that the phone companies have staff on the Home Office's payroll).
(8) • Causing me an unbelievable amount of distress, anxiety, torment and trauma, as well as huge costs and loss of time by - repeatedly and deliberately:
ignoring my documents ; failing to perform and/or have regard to statutory requirements ; putting me in a state of limbo / leaving me in the dark, by going into prolonged 'silent mode', not providing me with information ; communicating false information ; employing delaying tactics, etc. (Headers 1.1, 1.11 , # 2 , 3.2 , # 4) e.g.
(1) - The then London LVT: e.g. (i) - not copying me - deliberately - on key documents to which I was legally entitled, and needed to challenge Ladsky's application;
(ii) - in spite of the body of evidence, opting to 'believe' the lies by the Ladsky gang (some of many, many lies), as well as ignoring its own rule on non-compliance with its directions, it refused my request for a postponement of the 1st day of the substantive hearings - thereby forcing me to employ, at great costs, a team of advisors that resulted in exposing the lies;...
...(iii) - failing deliberately to perform its statutory duty by not including a summary of the impact of its findings "on the reasonableness of the global sum demanded", and refusing my repeated requests to address this major failing by - considering the remit of the tribunal...
...- making the outrageous claim: "It would not be appropriate for the Tribunal to produce a summary of their decision as this may well be regarded as providing additional reasons."; (vi) - Overall outcome.
(2) - West London County Court, in 2002-04, by e.g.: (i) - waiting 6 weeks to 'reply' to my letters and Defence that an abuse of process of court was taking place (and then throwing the ball back at me);
(ii) - turning a deliberate blind eye to the breaches of CPR, statutes and of my Lease by CKFT-Andrew Ladsky - and the judiciaries doing the same thing;...
...(iii) - having made me miss, deliberately, the 24 May 04 'hearing' - so that the judge could "stay" the action against me - (iv) - in collusion with Wandsworth County Court - subjecting me to more hell by - falsely - telling me, and insisting on it, that "[I was] the Defendant in a trial"...
...- meanwhile, keeping me totally in the dark, as they did not provide me - deliberately - with a copy of the recording until 2 months after the 24 May 04 'hearing' (having first sent the wrong tape, 1 month after my request); (v) - Overall outcome WLCC ; Overall outcome WCC.
(3) - West London County Court in 2007-08 - being even more determined than in 2002-04 on securing the fraudulent claim against me by, e.g. (i) - proceeding with a claim that had major failings, in spite of my highlighting it 11 TIMES over a 16-month period - starting with my Acknowledgment of service ;
ii) - to provide Ladsky with the opportunity to file for Summary Judgment against me - falsely capturing that in my Acknowledgment of Service "[I had] stated an intention to defend part of the claim";...
...(iii) - denying me the right to have the case transferred to the tribunal; (iv) - issuing Orders that perversely ignored my highlighting repeatedly very compelling evidence against the claim, and my stating that I was not provided with the information to which I was legally entitled;
(v) - turning a deliberate blind eye to the breaches of CPR, statutes and of my Lease by Portner - Ladsky - and the judiciaries doing the same thing;...
... (vi) - sending me a malicious, fraudulent letter masquerading as an Order, demanding that I pay £1,700 immediately - endorsing it with the threat of "striking out [my non-existent] counterclaim" =Defence, if I did not do it; (vii) going into a 3-month silent mode when the ploy failed;
(viii) - delaying - deliberately - sending me Orders; (ix) - ensuring that my transcribing company was not provided with the tape of a hearing - until after I had written my Defence; (x) - "Cancelling hearings" that had never been intended to be held; (xi) - Overall outcome.
(4) - Supreme Court Costs Office - Determined to continue in the footsteps of WLCC, in inflicting 'retribution': (i) - allowing me only 30% of my costs back, and no other compensation; (ii) - denying me the right to refer to my main document;
(iii) - challenging me for 'daring' to return my Acknowledgment of Service with a copy of 2 pages from the claim on which I very clearly highlighted key issues (that were then ignored repeatedly over the following 16 months). (iv) - Overall outcome.
(5) - Queen's Bench Division - (as in the case of the prior courts): totally ignoring all of my very compelling evidence, thereby continuing to deprive me of the right for justice and redress - and ensuring that the state's blatant abuse of power against me continues. Overall outcome.
(6)- The Stratford Employment Tribunal, as well as ACAS, ignoring my correspondence in relation to my Claim against KPMG.
(7) - KPMG that went into silent mode when its attempts at making me miss the 3-month deadline for filing my Claim failed.
(8) - 'My' then MP Sir Malcolm Rifkind who went into silent mode following my challenging him, followed by the Parliamentary Ombudsman who did the same thing, and with Rifkind (typically) engaged in fabrications - because they did not want to deal with my complaint i.e. act against 'the tribe'.
(9) - Police - Like ALL the others e.g.: (i) - ignoring deliberately my very compelling evidence against its so-called "crime reports"; (ii) - in spite of the evidence, persisting in portraying me as "the criminal", and Ladsky, the criminal, as "[my] victim";
(iii) - refusing to deal with my legitimate and well documented complaints of harassment against Ladsky.
(10) - Richard Twyman, Piper Smith Basham(Watton) - in order to ignore my 07.11.03 instructions, so that he could send a reply to Ladsky's 21.10.03 'Part 36 offer' that fitted with the cabal's plan.
(11) - And by totally ignoring my correspondence: the Ladsky gang: e.g. Martin Russell Jones (MRJ) re.:
(1)- 'service charge' demands; (2)- accounts for the block; (3)- 'electricity' demands; Martyn Gerrard that has, since 2011, continued in MRJ's footsteps: Summary of demands.
(10) • (Drawing on a vast army of 'Stasi') - on a daily basis (Header 4): (i) - from the time I leave 'the concentration camp', (ii) - while I am away, and (iii) - on my way back
...- being dogged, stalked, hounded, harassed and persecuted in the streets and on public transport...
... - as well as, at times: threatened (e.g. 19 Apr 06 ; 17 Jun 06 ; 20 Jul 10 ; 16 Jun 12);
provoked (e.g. 2 Mar 11 ; 16 Apr 11 (by uniformed local police) ; 28 Jan 13) (Header 1.16) ;
attacked (e.g. 16 Nov 10) - and even hounded in public toilets (13 Dec 10 ; 14 Apr 10)), as well as in church e.g. 24 Jun 14.
It also took place when I was working, including at lunchtime - snapshots below ; my Home Office Witness Statement - QB #6(1) ; examples of photographs in the Scum Gallery.
Being repeatedly harassed and persecuted by police helicopters and another type of plane.
New forms of harassment have been added by the police:
- 29 Oct 14: in an unmarked police car, setting the siren behind me, c. 50 meters from where I am, and then switching it off as soon as the car has gone past me;
- at Knightsbridge underground station: playing a recording about "feeling unwell": 1 Oct 15 ; 11 Oct 15+.
Being also stalked and hounded overseas.
(Other victims reporting the same thing e.g. (1) My Diary 20 May 10 ; 21 Jul 10 ; (2) whistleblower who "claims to have been followed by 'military types'")
(NB: As detailed above, and below, portraying me as "suffering from mental issues" and "from clinical paranoia", etc. is a typical 'Establishment' tactic, in part, intended to stop me from reporting the 'extremely inconvenient evidence'.
(Whistleblowers examples: Dr Shiban Ahmed, Alder Hay hospital ; Kay Sheldon, CQC ; Dr David Drew, Walsall Manor hospital ; Dr Hayley Dare, West London Mental Health NHS Trust)).
As you can imagine, in the early days, before the irrebutable evidence built up, it required A LOT of self-belief for me to report events on my website i.e. in the public domain - as I could see that I was mocked / ridiculed / passed off as "mad" - with, of course, one of the key instigators: Andrew David Ladsky - leading the pack e.g. his 26.03.07 letter to KPMG;
...saying that to his 'dogs' e.g. 16 May 06 ; him also saying that to me (so far) at least 4 times: 19 Apr 05 , w/c 4 Feb 08 , 15 May 08 , 16 Mar 09).
Question to those only too happy to lap up whatever they are told - including KPMG 'colleagues':
Looking at the evidence I report on this page: # 2 and # 3 - added to: media reports on state surveillance ; reports by many other individuals of being 'under surveillance' ; including the revelations by the whistleblower (because, 'of course, I still cannot be believed'): does it (still) look to you as though "[I am] mad"? (As you know, KPMG - et.al. - failed to implement their very sinister, Machiavellian plan: KPMG # 5.2).
(13) • Isolating me socially - By turning contacts I trusted against me (examples: My Diary # 2.4) - leading me, as a consequence, to cut off relation with remaining contacts, or because of concern that they, like me (# 2 and # 3, below), could also end-up being - unlawfully - placed under 'surveillance' (QB # 6(1)).
(14) • With the aim of having me sectioned: compiling and circulating widely, highly detrimental, false profiles of me ; securing the assistance of medical 'specialists' (Headers 1.14 , 1.17 , 1.18 , # 4)
(I most strongly hold the view that the pact 'to get me' was again renewed at the time of issuing me with a Notice of Discontinuance of "ALL the Feb 07 claim [against me]").
e.g. (1) - The police's 2007 "crime report" that portrays me as "extremely paranoid" and as "suffering from mental issues" - 'leading it' to "speak to social services to see if they are aware of [me]" (NB: Note what 'social services', with the help of compliant judiciaries, can do to people: Secret prisoners)...
... - as well as: (i) - equally in breach of my statutory rights, under the Data Protection Act 1998 - failing to provide me with other data it holds about me (highly likely to be even more detrimental), as well as sent to other parties;
(ii) - making its data available to over 50,000 people. (NB: Smearing people's reputation is one of the many sickening attributes of the police, et.al. in the Establishment - who use it as one of their standard tactics).
(2) - Ladsky's 26.03.07 letter to KPMG (# 3.5), in which he portrayed me as "undoubtedly suffering from clinical paranoia", and...
...(3) - In the street, w/c 4 Feb 08, telling me "You are mad". In 'the concentration camp', on 19 Apr 05: "You are mad! Go and see a psychiatrist!" ; on 8 May 08: "You are in very serious need of help".
(NB: The psycho was besides himself that, among other, I was 'daring' to continue fighting against his (2nd) fraudulent claim against me).
(4) - The psychiatrist who, on 7 May 08, attempted to get me locked up; (discussed also under KPMG # 13(2)).
(5) - Attempts by KPMG to do the same thing - that was joining the dots with its 'brothers' (KPMG # 5.2).
(NB: Portraying 'inconvenient' people who rock the boat as "mad", "suffering from mental issues", "paranoia", etc. - is a typical British Establishment tactic...on which thoroughly evil Rachman Ladsky was counting).
(15) • Capitalizing on my blind eye and deaf ears, and victimization experience with the police, judiciary, lawyers, surveyors, accountants, 'my' MP, ministers, etc., etc. - by reinforcing the message that the psychological harassment is free to continue - totally unhindered e.g.
(1) - Andrew David Ladsky getting Martyn Gerrard to send me ever growing fraudulent financial demands and, since mid-2012, with no supporting information - while ignoring all my correspondence;...
... (i) - the threat that non-payment could lead to yet, another fraudulent claim against me, which, on past experience, will be viciously and perversely pursued - and could also lead to the loss of my apartment (through forfeiture) (copy of definition), as I am not paying the ground rent, placing the amounts instead, as they are due, into a separate account.
(16) • Ensuring that even my apartment cannot be a place of refuge where, as a woman, on my own (further ensured by the above), I can feel safe and relax (Header 4):
(1) - Physical attacks in 'the concentration camp' i.e. "at the property" e.g.
- in the middle of the night, man banging on my windows for several minutes, while talking loudly and laughing with another man: 22 Feb 13;
- extensive criminal damage through repeated malicious escapes / pouring of water in my apartment:
- 11 Mar 02 - 00h15 - Bathroom - water falling through the extractor fan
- 8 Aug 05 - 00h45 - Bedroom (photos) - water falling from around a spotlight
- 18 Aug 05 - night - Bathroom (photos) - water from around the extractor fan
- 20 Jul 07 - while I was away - ALL my apartment flooded (photos)
- 21 Oct 13 - 22h00 - Bathroom (photos) - water falling from around a spotlight
- 17 Jan 14 - 22h43 - Bathroom (photos) - having been given the key to my apartment BY my "security-lock" provider, BANHAM - throwing a lot of water on the floor
- 26 Apr 14 - 21h30 - Bathroom (photos) - coming in my apartment to throw water on the floor
- 8 May 14 - 15h49 - 15h51 - Bathroom (film and photos) - at least 10 litres of water gushed through from around a spotlight (same as on 21 Oct 13) - in the space of 2 minutes
- 18 Jul 14 - 23h36 - 23h57 - Bathroom and corridor (films and photos) - probably more than 100 litres of water gushed through from around a spotlight in the bathroom (same as on 21 Oct 13 and 8 May 14) - over the 23-minute period, just before midnight (it adds to 'the fun').
....and one that narrowly missed my apartment, on 6 Feb 07.
(2) - Bugging my apartment.
(3) - Harassment, intimidation and provocation "at the property" e.g. 30 Jan 02 ; 1 Feb 02 ; 15 Feb 02 ; 26 Feb 02 ; 3 Jan 03 ; 25 Jan 03 ; 27 July 03 ; 31 Aug 03 ; 19 Apr 05 ; 9 Mar 09 ; 5 Nov 12 ; 21 Jan 13 ; 25 Jan 13 ; 30 Sep 13.
(4) - Making 20 anonymous phone calls.
(5) - Since 2005, ignoring my paid for, 26.07.05 demand for 2 extra fob keys for the main door - so that I could give the spare ones to my family in case I need help (MRJ # 45 ; 22 July 05).
(6) - Other forms of harassment "at the property".
(NB: For long periods of time, apartments surrounding mine are empty. WHY? Am I being bombarded with radiation? ('The patterns and steps' - header 4). Considering all of the above: maybe. Other plans? Other reason/s e.g. bugging equipment?)
As I wrote under para.171 of my 19.07.11 Witness Statement to the then Home Secretary, Theresa May (QB # 6(1)): (considering also the other actions, under # 2, above): "every day I ask myself: Is today the day I am going to be killed? Is tonight the night I am going to be killed?"
(What did HM's Theresa May then do? She and HM's William Hague, (then Foreign Secretary), continued to endorse warrants to have me persecuted: below, # 4.2 and # 4.3).
The evil Ladsky gang is doing the above, by counting on the fact that I KNOW from very extensive first-hand experience (e.g. Overview # 17 ; Article 2 of the Convention ; Article 3 ; Queen's Bench # 4 and # 6)
that there is absolutely no point my calling the CS Ellie O'Connor- controlled Kensington police - even if I am attacked - as, (with undeniable approval at high level), it is part and parcel of the criminal gang.
This led me to take precautionary measures, that have been perversely captured in a so-called "crime report" against me (police # 3 KP(3)(2)(11)) as "evidence" of my "suffering from mental issues" (police # 3 KP(3)(2)(10)) (above).
NOTE that, in 2014, with the obvious help of the CS Adrian Roberts-controlled Kensington police mafia, my "security-lock" provider, BANHAM, provided Ladsky with access to my apartment i.e. with the key.
In my world (on which they rely to add to the mental torture), you have be unbelievablysick and amoral to do the above to somebody like me i.e. who has done NOTHING wrong
- and equally as sick and amoral to maintain a conspiracy of silence and, hence, complicity, in the face of the evidence.
In what way are each and every one of those connected in one way or another with the above, different from e.g. President Bashar-al-Assad of Syria? (Killing innocent people with bullets, or through mental torture - is still killing people).
In fact, their actions from the start - added to their ongoing failure, post the launch of my website, to take action to meet my objectives, that would lead me to close this website, and leave this country - demonstrate further that they share the same psyche: they don't care that the world is watching.
As discussed briefly under Overview # 15, other forms of persecution - to be added to the above examples of criminal psychological harassment, and the below interference by the British state with ALL my means of communication - are my being under 'surveillance' - which includes:
my being dogged, hounded, tracked, monitored, harassed and persecuted - on a daily basis - since at least 2002 - on the instigation of Andrew David Ladsky and, concurrently, since 2005, by the British state,
as well as the use plants in attempts to 'assess my state of mind', act against me.
Note that the CS Ellie O'Connor-controlled local police of Kensington & Chelsea - concurrently with Andrew Ladsky - use plants with malicious intent against me. (The use of plants is one of the British state's many 'Stasi' 'specialties' e.g. Confidential Intelligence Unit and / or National Public Order Intelligence Unit ; Covert surveillance of campaigners).
ANDREW DAVID LADSKY ...
...- according to Her Majesty's CS Ellie O'Connor -controlled Kensington & Notting Hill police's so-called "crime reports" of 2003 and 2007 it holds against me: "my" 'poor' "Jewish" "neighbour" (!!!) the "vulnerable victim" 'I' "intimidate", 'dare' describe as "that evil, greed-ridden monster" (Her Majesty's Master Eyre), and to whom 'I', 'of course', represent 'a risk' (*) (Overview # 13)...
... - has had his 'dogs' tracking me, stalking me, hounding me, harassing me, and persecuting me since at least 2002 - which included doing it himself e.g. 7 Mar 02 (as I reported in e.g. my 04.08.02 letter to Sir Toby Harris, MPA).
(Use of snoops appears to be 'a Jewish thing' - making this island Kingdom the ideal environment in which to indulge - as demonstrated by its activities, as well as by my experience)
In fact, it will have started before 2002, for the purpose of profiling me to determine whether I could be a potential mark. (Having gained control of the headlease in 1996, Ladsky et.al. got the freehold for Jefferson House in June 1997. One year later, Ladsky filed a planning application to build a penthouse).
Profiling their marks is what this type of evil, utterly amoral, greed-ridden Rachman landlords and their racketeering aides, who make a living out of ripping-off leaseholders, do (e.g. example of leaseholders in another block) - and they and their aides have a permanent army of slimeballs on standby - supplemented (as covered below), by a vast army, courtesy of the corrupt elements within the state sector = at taxpayers' expense.
Evidently, it was concluded that I was 'a mark' - because:
- A woman, on my own, with limited financial means and no influential connections = won't resist for long; can (as briefly detailed above) be: exploited, blackmailed, persecuted, terrorised, tormented, harassed, bullied, victimised, intimidated, etc., and her name and character attacked - without feae of sanction, including from the police as, if required, it will help carry out the activities / ensure their implementation (as reported on this page).
= Will take the 'make the commercial decision pill'.
= A mark!
Since then, it has been about 'retribution' and 'vengeance' for 'my daring' to stand-up against his and his gang's criminal activities.
WHY? Was I, am I committing criminal offences? NO!
The trigger was - through my legitimate complaints against state departments and 'the professions' (that ALL resulted in a standard 'Get Lost! outcome) - my 'daring' to stand-up against 'Establishment'-controlled organized crime, that so readily helped Rachman Andrew Ladsky in the implementation of his fraudulent and other criminal activities - leading me to be perceived as 'a threat, a danger'. (See also # 6, 'The Brotherhood', below).
In typical organized crime style - I therefore 'had' to be monitored... as well as persecuted, harassed, terrorised, tormented, etc., in an attempt to make me give up.
Since then, the objective of the 'Establishment' and of the Ladsky gang (that is the ROOT CAUSE for ALL that has taken place) - has been 'retribution' and 'vengeance' for my 'daring' to not only give up, but also 'daring' to continue on fighting - that turned into a blind determination to destroy me (above).
Hence, one of the key objectives of the ongoing dogging, hounding, tracking, monitoring, etc., instigated by the Masonic-Ladsky gang is the use of its flunkeys to seize on any opportunity that offers the potential to act against me / 'get me' i.e. "kill [me], zip up the bag, bring [me] to the morgue". Examples (among many others): below, # 2.8, use of plants.
NOTE: I most strongly contend that the snapshots reported below (and linked to the detail), provide undeniable evidence in support of my above conclusions. If you are still finding it difficult to accept my conclusions, consider also e.g. the evidence contained in the snapshots under:
(Following the British state's example, that does not give a damn about the so-called 'rights' of its people - there is also an army of private snoops, also spying on the population).
My departure is signaled by Andrew David Ladsky / his in-house 'sentinels' from: (1) the surveillance equipment in my apartment; (2) the CCTV cameras; (3) the porter sitting in the entrance corridor.
EXAMPLES OF EVENTS - which demonstrate criminal psychological harassment by the British state and Andrew David Ladsky:
- 10 Feb 16 - About 4 minutes after I left 'the concentration camp', as I entered Hyde Park, I saw a helicopter arrive ahead of me. It then hounded me in the park for c.30 minutes.
- 22 Jan 15 - In the morning, one of the Kensington police mafia crew (I had seen before) stood in front of the Harvey Nichols store, by Knightsbridge underground station - oozing hatred as he was looking at me. I let him know that I was aware of his game. (There was follow-up on my way back in the evening).
- 20 Dec 14 - On the Brompton Rd, near Harrods, realising that I had spotted him, a Ladsky / police scum (same difference), used his mobile phone twice to report events.
- 1 Nov 13 - Having clearly lost sight of me after I left 'the concentration camp', I was first tracked, in a shop, by a Ladsky 'dog' who frantically sent a text. I was then 'escorted' back to the camp by a Kensington police's slimeball who reminded me of the one who chased me up the stairs at the French library around 20 Mar 10 - when the mafia had also lost track of me.
- 6 Oct 13 - Having hidden myself from 'the Luftwaffe' psychos, close to the concentration camp, for c.5 minutes, my then entering the block was immediately communicated to them, as they came back to dish out more criminal psychological harassment.
- 3 Oct 13 - A police helicopter flew quite low, immediately over Basil St, within 30 seconds of my coming out of 'the concentration camp'.
- 27 Aug 13 (photo) - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' stalked me in Knightsbridge.
- 2 May 13 - Some 40 minutes after my leaving 'the concentration camp', one of the 'Stasi' hounded me inside South Kensington station.
- 11 Mar 13 - My taking an 'unexpected' route from 'the concentration camp' led to some 'reorganization of the troops' - as one of the 'heavy brigade Gestapo' arrived, flustered at Marble Arch underground station and, once in the ticket hall, went back out again, following my saying: "Masons' pig".
- ... - one of Ladsky's 'dogs' (same type as examples in My Diary 10 Feb 12) - kept trying to provoke me. Having followed me, it led to an altercation: me shouting at him "LADSKY's DOG!" and "SATANIC VERMIN!", and him telling me: "FUCK OFF!" - leading me to shout back "SATANIC VERMIN!". (I was wearing my T-shirt).
- 3 Jan 13 - I was hounded to South Kensington, and then in the underground by one of the inmates from the local 'Lunatic House'. It is was followed by being tailed in a shop.
- Sep-Nov 12 - The lunatics communicate their frustration at the fact that I no longer acknowledge them.
- 31 Jul 12 (photo) - One of the local police goons (clearly with additional 'support') dogged me in Knightsbridge for c. 40 minutes, showing up again once I had boarded a bus - in what I concluded was intended to communicate: 'whatever you do, we know where you are; you can't escape us'.
- 10 Feb 12 (photos) - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' followed me, and then came in a shop in which I had gone in order to test my suspicion.
- 25 Apr 11 (photo) - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' followed me from 'the concentration camp' to Sloane St, and then waited for me to board the bus - at which point he turned back down Basil St, knowing that 'the state-team' would then take over the monitoring from the CCTV control rooms.
- 9 Apr 11 (photos) - Man in nearby street, waited for me to arrive; I caught him as he turned around.
- 22 May 10 (photo) - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' hounded me to South Kensington, including coming inside the underground station.
- 20 May 10 (photo) - A scum, in Sloane St, I unconsciously recognised from nearly 1 year previously (photo), when I concluded that he had been monitoring me, locally - replied to my asking him, "On whose payroll are you?": "The devil". He then followed me, including making a fist gesture at me.
- 6 May 10 (photos) - One of the local police followed me from Knightsbridge to South Kensington where another one was waiting. On realising I spotted him, he did a circuit.
- 24 Mar 10 (photo) - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' followed me to South Kensington. 5 minutes later, when I reached the library, one of the local police arrived. A few days earlier, one of them had demonstrated his fury at having lost track of me by chasing after me, once I was inside the library.
And many years before that: e.g.
- 16 Jul 05 - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' dogged me as I was doing some local errands.
- 26 Aug 05 - Prior to getting inside the Knightsbridge underground station, I spotted a man, stationary. I had seen him before. Once I got inside the station, I concluded that others were also involved. It included a woman who had followed me all the way to my destination, and then pushed to go past me to ensure I noticed her.
- 23 Jan 06 - As I went to the bus stop, I spotted at least 2 men, stationary, I concluded they were local police Masons' flunkeys monitoring my departure, aiming to intimidate me.
- 7 Mar 06 - Again, in the morning, at least 2 local police Masons' flunkeys monitored my departure, one of which I had seen at least 2-3 times previously, and who obviously 'did not like' my doing a little 'circuit'.
- 20 Mar 06 - One of Ladsky's 'dogs', a female, I concluded was positioned alongside Harrods to monitor my departure.
- 28 Mar 06 - Another of Ladsky's 'dogs' who realised I had spotted him, and was clearly at a loss at what he should be doing next.
- 12 May 06 (photo) - One of Ladsky's 'dogs', a female, who followed me inside Knightsbridge station, and was clearly very uncomfortable realising I had spotted her.
- 16 May 06 (photo) - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' who panicked when I challenged him, leading him to phone, I assume, Ladsky, to get 'directions' as to what he should be doing next.
- 20 Jun 06 (photo) - Having gone to my local dentist, a 'dog' was waiting for me as I came out.
- 27 Jul 06 - In the morning, I had an escort of several to see me off; in the evening, some sentinels monitored my return.
(I repeat my above note under 2.1 about my capturing evidence about this in my Witness Statement to the then Home Secretary Theresa May).
EXAMPLES OF EVENTS - which demonstrate criminal psychological harassment by the British state, Andrew David Ladsky and other of the state's hangers-on and cronies:
- 1 Mar 16 - Another one in an unmarked car (number plate LL65 JHK) / one of Ladsky's 'Mossad' 'dogs' (= same difference) tracked me to Harrington Gardens, and monitored me.
- 14 Sep 16 - Wanting to determine whether I am also being tracked on the underground, at Bank station I did a one-finger sign at a camera. The very swift response proved that I am.
- 15 Sep 16 - Ensuring he would get my attention, one of the local goons came in the garden of the Brompton Oratory - most likely as retaliation for my 'daring' to make a one finger sign at his mates, the previous day.
- 29 Oct 14 - 11h50 and 22h35 - Police psychos launched a new form of criminal psychological harassment: in an unmarked police car, setting the siren on behind me, c. 40 meters from where I am, and then switching it off as soon as the car has gone past me.
- 19 Oct 14 (photo) - As I reached my ex. uni, on Bunhill Row, I concluded that a Metropolitan police rider, on a scooter, number plate LJ13 HHU, decided to let me know that he had been tailing me.
- 31 Aug 14 - (Having deviated from my 'expected journey'), as I was on Trafalgar Sq talking to somebody who had stopped me to ask me about my T-shirt, one of the 'Stasi' goons barged in on our conversation.
- Implying that I should have been dispossessed of my apartment, he twice asked me whether I was "still living in the flat". (They'll take ANY opportunity to add to the psychological harassment).
- 5 Jun 14 (photo) - 'My daring' to communicate to one of Ladsky's 'Mossad' 'dogs' my awareness that he was monitoring me when I left the 'concentration camp' - led to one of Ladsky's other 'dogs' from the local goon squad, to demonstrate that they are, as ever, ready to jump on the order of their master.
- 2 Mar 14 - Ladsky had one of his 'dogs' stalk me on the underground. I spotted him when I changed line at Kings Cross.
- 5 Nov 13 - One of the police mafia came in the - private - library of my ex. uni to determine where I was, because I had replied - in an e-mail to a contact - that I might attend Bonfire night. (Previous occasion of police given access to library in connection with me: 7 Jun 11)
- 2 Oct 13 - I believe that a female 'Stasi' monitored me on my way to a movie.
- 16 Aug 13 (photo) - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' came to check on me in an internet café on Edgware Rd, then another one harassed me in a store, and then in the street.
- 18 Jun 13 - One of the state's 'Stasi' monitored my departure from the university. I was subsequently tracked to where I went.
- 12 Jun 13 - At Chancery Lane, I was tailed by a state's 'Stasi' goon in a health food store. It seemed that another one, then also got on my tail.
- 5 Apr 13 (photos) - As I was nearing my ex. university, 1 of the state's 'Stasi' run ahead of me to demonstrate - yet again - that, in spite of my detour, it had tracked me down.
- 22 Jan and 24 Jan 13 - On each occasion, a goon was positioned at King's Cross underground station, evidently tasked with monitoring that I would take the expected route.
- 19 Jan 13 - In the underground, in spite of changing line frequently, I was hounded repeatedly from platform to platform by 'the Gestapo', behaving like a pack of demented, blood-thirsty hyenas.
- 2 Jan 13 - Having done 'a circuit', I was hounded by a state goon to a financial outlet, near Oxford Circus.
- Sep-Nov 12 - The lunatics communicated their frustration at the fact that I no longer acknowledged them.
- 20 May 12 (photo) - 2 what appeared to me to be Masons' police flunkeys, arrived, by car, at my ex .university, evidently to ensure I would go in. They departed furiously because I had not done what they expected me to do.
- 19 May 12 - 2 of what appeared to be Ladsky's 'dogs' monitored my departure from my ex. university.
- 14 May 12 (photo) - I was hounded by a Masons' goon (who, like many of the others, appeared to have been watching too many Rambo movies) - to see what I was going to do.
- 5 May 12 - One of the Ladsky / state scum (I opt for the former) awaited my arrival at my ex. university.
- 11 Aug 11 - I was tracked going to a law firm - and was made to know that I had.
- 9 May 11 (photo) - Ladsky had one of his 'dogs' track me in a McDo then, waiting for me to come out, the 'dog' harassed me on my way to the bus stop.
- 2 Mar 11 - On a bus, in the course of an evidently planned attack, a man called me "a whore", "a bloody foreigner who comes to this country as a freedom fighter" (I was NOT wearing my T-shirt, and I did NOT utter a word) - as well as an assortment of other abusive names.
- 16 Nov 10 - In what was clearly a planned attack, on a bus, I was verbally abused by a man who also tried to hit me.
- 2 Jun 10 (photos) - While shopping, I was stalked by 2 of Ladsky's 'dogs' - to whom I communicated that I aware of their game.
- 20 Mar 10 - I assume, because his mates had lost track of me, one of the local police mafia communicated his anger to me - by chasing me up the stairs, at the French Institute.
- 6 Jun 09 (photo) - Ladsky had sent one of his 'dogs' to monitor me in the library - and make it known that he was. (One of many tasked with doing that, including one of Ladsky's close females (screaming of bling, with hands, arms and neck laden with yellow gold) who came and sat immediately opposite me, expressing a sneer, thinking she was very clever doing that, believing I was not aware of her game and of who sent her. (I left in the next 2 minutes).
- (There are numerous other examples in My Diary for 2009 and other years).
The psycho 'Gestapo' is even hounding me in public toilets e.g.13 Dec 10 - The male Orwellian state 'Stasi' walked inside the women's toilets to see if I was there. One of Ladsky's 'dogs' also did this on 14 Apr 10.
Likewise, it has been going on for many years before that e.g.
- 19 Apr 05 - Ladsky's comment to me: "You are mad", and to "Go and see a psychiatrist' demonstrated that, on that day, he had me followed, as, in the morning, I had seen a therapist (I had not seen in 2 years).
- 1 Jun 05 - One of the Masons' goons tracked me and my Honorary Mum as we were having lunch in the centre of town. Sitting next to us in the restaurant, he was trying to listen to our conversation. He left from my making him know that I was aware of it. 40 minutes later, he was close behind us in the street. (It made it my 2nd Witness).
- 16 Aug 05 - Having come out of work, as I was walking on the pavement, a cyclist purposely drove the front wheel of his bicycle on the pavement, and stopped abruptly immediately in front of me.
etc., etc., etc.
It also took place at lunch time, when I was working e.g.
- 31 Aug 05 - By a female, at lunch time, and by the same female, in the evening, when I left work.
- 4 Jan 06 - I did a test that proved conclusively my suspicion.
- 9 Aug 07 (photo) - Ditto: another test that proved my suspicion.
etc., etc., etc.
(I repeat my above note under 2.1 about my capturing evidence about this in my Witness Statement to the then Home Secretary Theresa May).
EXAMPLES OF EVENTS - which demonstrate criminal psychological harassment by the British state and Andrew David Ladsky:
- 22 Jan 15 - In the morning, in the area of 'the concentration camp', I had challenged one of the Kensington police mafia crew. In the evening, at Marble Arch underground station, one I assumed to be from a related police agency, and to be tasked with dishing out some retaliation for 'my daring' to challenge the other one - ensured that I was made aware of his interest in me.
- 7 Jan 14 - Acting in tandem with his 'Luftwaffe' henchmen, at midnight, Ladsky had 2 of his 'dogs' sitting in a car (LD62 TTZ), waiting for me after I left the library, and clearly tasked with harassing me. I concluded that there was also a link with the below 30 Sep 13 entry.
- 14 Oct 13 - Ladsky had 1 of his 'dogs' monitor my departure from my ex. uni. 'Dog' and car looked to me to be the same as on 18 Jun 12.
- 18 Jun 13 - Having clearly been informed of my imminent arrival, by the slimeballs in the streets, bus CCTV control room/s, one of Ladsky's 'dogs', driving in a car, slowed down, to ascertain my return.
- 18 Jun 12 - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' waited for me to start crossing Sloane Street, and drove the car straight at me - thereby repeating what took place on e.g. 1 Aug 06.
- 13 May 10 (photo) - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' stalked me from South Kensington.
- 19 Jul 10 (photos) - Ladsky had 2 'dogs' stalk me on my way back from High St Kensington. One of them gave me a one finger sign. To the other, I said that if he kept harassing me, I would report him for harassment.
etc., etc., etc.
And, ditto, for many years before that e.g.
- 6 Aug 05 - As I was walking on the pavement, a cyclist hurtled himself at me, at high speed, from the opposite pavement.
- 17 Aug 05 - Ladsky had one of his female 'dogs' wait for me at Knightsbridge station.
- Feb 06 - On leaving the office, I was monitored by a scum. In total, he did this at least 4 times.
- 19 Apr 06 - One of Ladsky's 'dogs' hounded me from the time I left work, and went, with me, into the underground station. At my destination, once I had come out of the underground, he hounded me and harassed me in the street.
- 1 Aug 06 - After midnight, 4 men, in a parked car, were waiting for me to arrive, on my own, in a deserted street. As I was about to cross the - dead-end - street, they started the car and drove it straight at me.
- 25 Oct 07 - A friend of mine, an experienced bodyguard, agreed with me that we were observed by a police individual (evidently one of the local police, as I had seen him before), and continued to be dogged and monitored afterwards. It also proved that the text messages I had exchanged with my friend had been intercepted - and READ - and the conversations LISTENED TO! (It made it my 3rd Witness).
etc., etc., etc.
(1)- Assassins - see My Diary # 2.4
(2)- 'Luftwaffe' - because:
(1) - Her Majesty's English police has (outrageously) branded me "a Nazi", "because of my franco-german (sic) origin".
(2) - Some of the tactics used by Her Majesty's British Transport Police are reminiscent of those used by the Nazis' Luftwaffe - in war time! As evidenced by the below snapshots:
Further, since mid-2013, I have added 'Stasi' and 'terrorists' - because of its relentless persecution (2013 Summary and Statistical analysis ; 2014 Summary and Statistical analysis ; 2015 Summary and Statistical analysis) - that has the objectives of:
(1) - causing me psychological harassment: the Stasi's "ZERSETZUNG" tactic (# 1(3), above) (= same as in the case of others in the public and private sector, and the Ladsky mafia: examples);
(2) - terrorising me (Header 1.3) - although their "use of intimidation" is actually "authorized" at high level = by other 'terrorists' (as well as endorsed by the European Court of Human Rights!) - and is done "in the pursuit of political gains" = getting brownie points from their masters in 'the Brotherhood' - starting with the judiciary (as evidenced by the strong correlation, in 2013, between the attacks and the updates of my website).
(I repeat my above note under 2.1 about my capturing evidence about this in my Witness Statement to the then Home Secretary Theresa May).
EXAMPLES OF ATTACKS - which demonstrate very blatant criminal psychological harassment by the British state:
- (3) 18 Sep 10 - When I was walking in Hyde Park, it hounded me for several minutes, including following me outside the park - because the mafia wanted to get its sadistic kick.
- (4) 22 Sep 10 (photo) - In South Kensington - Ditto, and because I had 'dared' deviate from my usual journey.
- (5) 28 Jul 11 - Next to my ex. university - Clearly worried I might ask for help for the following day's court 'hearing', a police helicopter was used as stand-by, in case I gave the run to 2 flunkies (photos) who, sitting in a car, were waiting for me to arrive.
- (10) & (11) - 30 May & 1 Jun 12 - Next to my ex. university - To demonstrate, yet again, 'displeasure' at the fact that I had done a little 'circuit', and because the 'dogs' had, by then, probably been called off.
- (12) 14 Jun 12 - At Marble Arch - To make sure I went where the flunkies expected me to go, because, on that day, I had again 'deviated' from my usual journey.
- (13) 22 Jul 12 - As I came out of 'the concentration camp' - Because it 'did not like' my input into documents? To remind me that I am being constantly monitored?
- (15) 27 Jul 12 (photo) - On my way to my ex. university - It acted as a kind of 'escort', by following the bus, and then hovered above to ascertain I was going to go where it expected me to go .
- (16) 12 Aug 12 (photos) - By St Paul's - Because I was 'deviating from my expected course', and to demonstrate that I 'cannot escape' the (psycho) 'Gestapo'.
- (17) 30 Sep 12 - In the Russell Square area - To demonstrate that I cannot escape 'the surveillance' - even when I 'dare' to not inform the mafia of my intentions.
- (18) 23 Nov 12 - Close to my ex. university - To communicate its 'displeasure' at my taking an 'untypical' route which, I concluded, led its psycho counterpart 'Gestapo' to lose track of me. It included the helicopter tilting downwards, while facing me, as it was flying very low.
- (19) 4 Dec 12 - Preceding it by sending one of the 'Gestapo' to hound me in St Katharine's Docks - to communicate its 'displeasure' at the fact that I did not go where it expected me to go - and 'perhaps' because the 'Thought Police' 'did not like' the previous update of My Diary.
(The freqency of the attacks shot up from the time I placed the reworked legal pages on my website)
- (20) 10 Jan 13 - Over my ex. university - To demonstrate it knew where I was, following my 'daring' to not go where it expected me to go - 'show time': 3 minutes.
- (21) 17 Jan 13 - At Liverpool St station - To demonstrate its 'displeasure' and that of its psycho 'Gestapo' counterparts at my giving them the run.
- (22) 12 Mar 13 (photos) - For 4 minutes, over and next to Cannon St station - including diving straight at me (same threatening move as on e.g. 23 Nov 12). Ditto about the psycho 'Luftwaffe' demonstrating its 'displeasure' at my taking an unexpected route - and to demonstrate that I will not escape its 'surveillance' = criminal psychological harassment. A small plane (=drone?) was immediately ahead of it (# 4, below)
- (23) 14 Mar 13 (photos) - On Gresham St - EC2, continuation of the criminal psychological harassment by 'the Luftwaffe' lunatics - as previously, in tandem with, what I concluded appeared to be a drone (?) - as well as, it seemed, involving a police car that went past me slowly 2-3 minutes after the helicopter flew over. Reason: to demonstrate that I cannot escape them - even when I give their psycho 'Stasi' counterparts the run around.
- (25) 11 May 13 - To ascertain I was going to where they expected me to, the psychos tracked me on Bunhill Row for 2 minutes.
- (27) 24 July 13 - Late evening, I was hounded and harassed in South Kensington by the psycho 'Luftwaffe', I assume to communicate: it knew where I was; and, perhaps, 'displeasure' at my website update.
- (29) 11 Aug 13 (photo) - In the morning, next to, and by my ex. uni, I was hounded by the 'Luftwaffe' wanting to ascertain I had gone where it expected me to go.
- (31) 8 Sep 13 ( photo) - At 11h12, as I arrived at the Northampton Sq uni, the 'terrorists' flew suddenly above me.
- (34) 16 Sep 13 - From 18h20 - Ditto re. when I was in the library - 'show time': 5 minutes.
- (35) 18 Sep 13 - From 17h10 - Ditto - 'show time': for 6-7 minutes.
- (36) 22 Sep 13 - From 19h40 - Ditto - 'show time': 3-4 minutes.
- (37) 25 Sep 13 - From 15h20 - Ditto - 'show time': 10 minutes.
- (38) 28 Sep 13 (photo) - From 12h11 - Ditto - 'show time': 7-8 minutes.
- (46 & 47) 26 Oct 13 - When I was in the Northampton Sq library, 'the Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' started their 'show' from 11h50, and came back for a repeat, from 15h50 - total 'show time': 5 minutes.
- (58 & 59) 30 Nov 13 (photos) - 'The Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' hounded me and persecuted me from 10h42, by flying very low immediately above me as I arrived at the Northampton Sq library, and then, from 11h53, when I was in the library, by hovering quite low over / very near the building - total 'show time': 12 minutes.
- (61) 2 Dec 13 - From 19h43, when I was in the Northampton Sq library, 'the Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' repeated their harassment, by flying quite low over / near the building, leaving and coming back a few seconds later, and flying even lower - in the process, communicating rage - total 'show time': 12 minutes.
- (63) 6 Dec 13 - While I had done a 'circuit' from leaving the Northampton Sq library, 'the Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' flew immediately above as I came off a bus near Harrods, at 21h03, and, in case I had missed it, repeated the 'show' over Basil St - total 'show time': 2 minutes.
- (64) 7 Dec 13 - Having also done a 'circuit', at 10h06, as I was very close to my ex uni on Bunhill Row, the 'terrorists' flew immediately over.
- (66) 28 Feb 14 - At 19h07, as I was under a bus shelter near Old St station, 'the Luftwaffe' positioned itself low, over it for c.15 seconds, then moved away slowly and sideways in order to be in full view.
- (67) 1 Mar 14 (photo) - Within c.1 minute of my leaving my ex. uni, 'the Luftwaffe' flew over at 17h15, as I was walking on Bunhill Row.
- (68) 5 Mar 14 (photos) - Because I had taken an 'unexpected route', 'the Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' hounded me over the Moorgate area for 10 minutes. A police car also appeared to be part of the party.
- (69) 11 Mar 14 - Having just come off a bus, as I reached Brompton Rd, at 22h15, one of 'the Luftwaffe' flew over me, relatively low.
- (70) 12 Mar 14 - Having used my mobile phone to set-up meeting a friend at Charing Cross, and having agree that we would then walk to Chinatown, as we arrived in the main street, at c.19h30, one of 'the Luftwaffe' flew quite low above us.
- (71) 4 Apr 14 (photo) - Within seconds of my leaving my ex. uni on Northampton Sq, at 19h48, a helicopter arrived, and then circled / hovered over / near the building for c. 3 minutes.
- (72) 8 Apr 14 (photo) - Walking on Goswell Rd, at 17h38, as I was close to the Northampton Sq uni, I concluded that a police helicopter was tracking me
- (73) 9 Apr 14 - At 10h15, within seconds of my coming out of Bank underground station, a police helicopter flew relatively low over Bank, in the direction of St Paul's. To ensure being seen, the psychos went full circle, and repeated the same thing.
- (74) 10 Apr 14 - 09h46 - 1/4 of the way down Exhibition Rd, as I was reaching my destination, I saw a police helicopter flying relatively low at the other end of the road, in the direction of Earl's Crt - thereby ensuring that it could be seen sideways.
- (75) 10 Apr 14 - 21h30 - After leaving the library, as I was waiting at a bus stop by Chancery Lane underground station, having 1st gone, briefly, into the store that is behind it - 'the Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' flew low immediately above the bus stop.
- (76) 17 Apr 14 - At 09h30, desperate to get their sadistic kicks, the psychos flew low immediately above me as I was about to enter the Chancery Lane library. By then, from 'the concentration camp', I had taken 3 buses; stopped in 3 stores; spent 10 minutes on a bench within meters of the library.
- (77) 22 Apr 14 (photos) - Leaving the Chancery Lane library 'earlier than usual', I took a bus and got off on Piccadilly, across from the Royal Academy. Within 4 seconds of my doing that, 'the Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' arrived, flying low over the Academy. They then flew slowly over the bus stop where I was and, having yet again got their sadistic kick, the psychos departed.
- (78) 30 Apr 14 - After a long trip on a bus, within 2 seconds of my being on Tottenham Crt Rd, at 14h30, to ensure I would hear them above the street noise, the psychos flew low immediately above me.
- (79) 30 Apr 14 - Needing more sadistic kicks, the psychos delivered another 'show' for the day by, within 4 seconds of my coming out of the Northampton Sq library - at 23h34 - flying twice quite low above me.
- (81) 20 May 14 - As I was walking on Oxford St, at the height of Selfridges, a police helicopter flew quite low immediately above me.
- (82) 2 Jun 14 (photo) - At 19h30, as I came out of the library by Chancery Lane, yet again, a police helicopter flew quite low immediately over me. Then, because I went to Victoria station, a destination I was 'not expected to go to', at 20h22, 'the Luftwaffe' was again on the prowl.
- (83) 22 Jun 14 (photos) - In the area of the Northampton Square library, I was 'treated' to 'a MULTI-PARTICIPANTS show' - that started when I came off a bus on City Road, and ended , 11 minutes later, when I was in St John St, by Aleysbury St.
- (86) 18 Jul 14 (photos) - Continuing to demonstrate that it is above the law, with the aim of, among others, getting its fix of sadistic kicks, Her Majesty's 'Luftwaffe' hounded me and harassed me incessantly by circling repeatedly over me for 10 minutes, near Piccadilly Circus - including using, now for at least the 4th time, the Nazis' Luftwaffe's dive-bombing tactic.
- (87) 18 Aug 14 - Having evidently suffered withdrawal symptoms while I was on holiday overseas, the psychos abandoned their observation of the area of the Ecuadorian Embassy - in order to hound me and persecute me - in the process bringing the total 'show time' to 20 minutes.
- (88) 10 Oct 14 (video and photos) - At the back of Motcomb St, some 'Luftwaffe' psychos persecuted me for 6 minutes - I assume - TYPICALLY - as 'retribution' for 'my daring', the previous evening, to let one of their 'Jewish' masters' 'dogs' know that I was aware of his monitoring my movements, and perhaps because I had not gone where I was 'expected to go'.
- (89) 27 Oct 14 (photo) - Was this a police helicopter flying low, on my side as I was walking on Lever St?
- ('The Luftwaffe' had done 'an extended version' of this on 25 July 12 following my loading a major update on my website).
- (91) 24 Nov 14 (video and photos) - typically, as I 'dared' to make an 'unexpected' trip, at an 'unusual' time, 'the Luftwaffe' tracked me from at least South Molton St to St George St, by Maddox St - which then translated into another 'show time' from 14h26, for a further 6 minutes.
- (92) 25 Nov 14 - Having traveled from east of town, as I came off a bus across from the Royal Academy, on Piccadilly, 'the Luftwaffe' flew low and slowly immediately above.
- (94) 6 Jan 15 (video and photos) - After a 3-week respite: continuation of the persecution by 'the Luftwaffe' - assuming a stationary position opposite the windows of my ex. uni, on Northampton Square...
- (95) 8 Jan 15 - Preceding the next event, in the afternoon, 'the Luftwaffe' had also been circling repeatedly over the uni on several occasions.
- (96) 8 Jan 15 (video and photos) - for 19 minutes I was persecuted by 'the Luftwaffe' - again at my ex. uni - which entailed the very sick psychos: (1)- circling above / immediately next to the uni 5 TIMES; (2)- remaining stationary for c. 12 minutes.
- (97) 7 Feb 15 (video and photos) - for 13 minutes I was persecuted by 'the Luftwaffe', this time, as I was at a bus stop on Old St - which entailed the very sick psychos: (1)- making at least 8 turns / circles; (2)- remaining stationary for c. 3 minutes.
- (98) 17 Feb 15 - for 45 minutes the psychos went back and forth / circled over the Northampton uni numerous times, at relatively low altitude.
- (99) 20 Feb 15 - am (photo) - Wanting to demonstrate that they are continuing to track me, as I arrived at the uni on Northampton Sq, 'the Luftwaffe' flew on my side, over Goswell Rd.
- (100) 20 Feb 15 - pm (video and photos) - for 7 minutes I was persecuted by 'the Luftwaffe' on Myddelton St, shortly after I left the Northampton Sq uni - which entailed the psychos making repeated circles.
- (101) 23 Feb 15 - am (video and photos) - for 1 hour and 25 minutes - 'the Luftwaffe' persecuted me as I was on the 6th floor of my ex. uni's library on Northampton Sq.
- Additional reason to the usual motive? The psychos evidently 'did not like' my update on YouTube that included adding 3 new videos (above: 6 Jan, 8 Jan and 7 Feb 15) - because 'it's okay' for these 'we are above the law' satanic monsters to torment you, in the belief that you can't prove it.
- (102) 23 Feb 15 - pm - As the morning session was evidently not enough to satisfy their VERY SICK needs, in the afternoon, they were back again for another 'show', this time for 10 minutes.
- (103) 3 Mar 15 - Having evidently lost track of me from my stopping somewhere 'unexpected' - to communicate its anger, and demonstrate that I cannot escape the surveillance for long, as I came out of the place some 3 hours later, the psycho 'Luftwaffe Stasi' hovered low, immediately above me, for nearly 2 minutes.
- (The 400 missing registered sex offenders can sleep soundly!)
- (104) 10 Mar 15 - Having yet again caused panic by going somewhere 'unexpected', 4.5 hours later the psychos communicated that they knew where I was by hovering low, very close to the building, for nearly 2 minutes.
- After an under 2-minute-'show', they monitored me going to the bus stop, and then appeared to hover around in the distance until I boarded a bus.
- (106 and 107) 24 Mar 15 (video and photos) - In the morning, for 27 minutes, and then again for another 10 minutes in the afternoon - the very seriously mentally deranged 'Luftwaffe' yet again persecuted me as I was on the 6th floor of my ex. uni's library on Northampton Sq - by staging a similar 'show' to that on 24 Feb 15.
- The difference was that it did its continuous circling and hovering, at low altitude, predominantly over the university...continuing to tempt fate for major disaster to happen.
- (108) 27 Mar 15 (video and photos) - Instead of going to one of the libraries, I did various errands = I went to places the 'Stasi' goons did not expect me to go to. Having evidently lost track of me (I was not wearing my T-shirt that makes it easier to spot me) - TYPICALLY - the 'Luftwaffe' was called upon to join the search party.
- Having found me, it hounded me and persecuted me repeatedly in Hanover St, then in Hanover Square - for 18 minutes. Among other, 'the show' entailed a new addition: FLYING SIDEWAYS.
- (109) 2 Apr 15 (video and photo) - Within barely 2 minutes of my leaving the Northampton uni, at a much earlier time than usual, the 'Luftwaffe' communicated that its informants had (as per usual) immediately reported my departure from the uni.
- (110) 7 Apr 15 (video and photos) - The very seriously mentally deranged 'Luftwaffe' came back for another dose of sadistic kicks, as I was on the 6th floor of my ex. uni's library on Northampton Sq - by staging a similar 'show' to that on 23 Feb and 24 Mar 15 - for 8 minutes.
- (111) 8 Apr 15 - 24 hours later, the psychos were back to do the same thing. Partly due to, I concluded, failing to get my attention, the 'show' entailed two long sessions in the afternoon, of endlessly circling, going to and fro in front and over the building (judging from the noise of the engine). Total time: at least 1 hour and 30 minutes.
- (112) 9 Apr 15 - Continuing to confirm their insanity, 24 hours later, the psychos were back, yet again, for another dose of sadistic kicks - when I was on the 6th floor of the Northampton Sq uni. For a least 15 minutes, they flew endlessly past the uni, as well as circled near / above it. (Judging from the noise of the engine. I did not capture evidence).
- (113) 20 Apr 15 - Another 'show' by the satanic monsters - again when I was in the 6th floor library of the Northampton uni; this time, it lasted 35 minutes.
- (114) 21 Apr 15 - As I was in the Chancery Lane library, to demonstrate that they (of course) knew where I was, the insane monsters came to deliver another show: for 10 minutes.
- (116) 11 May 15 - Tracking me, for at least 5 minutes, after I left a location south of the river, by Wandsworth Bridge.
- (117) 21 May 15 - South of the river, by Wandsworth Bridge, the satanic monsters flew low over a store, c. 5 minutes after I had been inside, and hovered nearby when I left the store c. 15 minutes later.
- (119) 22 May 15 - As I came off a bus on Edgware Road, the satanic monsters appeared suddenly by flying low immediately above me.
- (120) 25 May 15 - As I came out of the Tesco store on St John St, the insane 'Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' flew low and rapidly immediately above me.
- (121) 28 Jun 15 (video and photos) - As soon as I came off a bus on Rosebery Avenue, the insane 'Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' flew close to me. Having followed me in Spencer St, where they (typically) goaded me, they then delivered one of their usual 'shows' - bringing the total hounding time to 15 minutes.
- (122) 1 July 15 (photo) - Having come out of Aldgate underground station ('unusual' for me), about 10 minutes later, when I was in Cutler's Gdns, in the space of c. 20 seconds, this grey coloured helicopter flew over me twice, as well hovered. The helicopter pilot fraternity closing rank - adding, yet again, another breed of psychos to the others?
- (123) 28 Sep 15 - Because I went somewhere 'unexpected': a long walk in Hyde Park, the 'Luftwaffe' joined the search party and hounded me.
- (124) 14 Oct 15 - The 'Luftwaffe' communicated that it 'did not like' my tricking its criminal mates in the CCTV control rooms: by flying low over ' the concentration camp'.
- (125) 10 Feb 16 - The assassins tracked me, stalked me and harassed me for c.30 minutes when I was in Hyde Park.
- (126) and (127) - Apr 16 - In the evening - Two more attacks when I was in an internet café on Edgware Rd.
(There have been other attacks since 2007).
(On the 2nd page of 1984, George Orwell tells us that: "a helicopter skimmed down between the roofs. It was the police patrol, snooping into people's windows". From what I report on this page, and in other parts of this site, I really feel as though I am living in the world described by Orwell. This man had extraordinary insights).
As well as, by means of a small type of plane (DRONES?) e.g.:
- (2) 14 Jun 12 - In the area of Angel underground station - Ditto: because they 'disapproved' of my 'deviating' from my usual journey.
- (3) 8 Feb 13 - On my way to my ex. university - It kept cris-crossing ahead of me. Once in the university, it kept hovering above. Reason: because I, 'the pariah', had 'dared' to go to Canary Wharf, and, on top of that, was wearing my T-shirt.
- (4) 12 Mar 13 - The same type of plane, including being all white, and no apparent windows at the front (are they drones?) flew over Cannon St station, as I was coming out. It was followed, c.40-50 meters behind, by a helicopter (# 22 above).
(2.5)- How they track me (above, under # 2.1, # 2.2 and # 2.3) (in addition to the helicopters, above)
(See the above NOTE, re. evidence adding (if required) credence to my below reporting involvement by the British state).
Through the state-controlled CCTV cameras in the streets, on buses, and in the underground - added to:
- (1)- an army of plain clothes police on public transport e.g. the pack of demented, blood-thirsty hyenas who hounded me in the underground from platform to platform on 19 Jan 13; those who come close to you to listen to what you are saying e.g. c. May 14;
ALL of these, including the police helicopters (above), come under Her Majesty's British Transport Police (BTP)...that also uses police officers keen to do "some overtime on their way home" (Media pg, Telegraph, 14 Oct 14)...
...and add to their extra cash by also operating as a fully integrated team with criminals...or are they doing it as 'a favour' in my case?
Note that, if you, somehow, manage to escape the myriad of CCTV cameras, councils also use 'CCTV enforcement' cars e.g. City of London - which also uses 'spy bins' to track people's movements.
(It reminds me of the telescreens used by the Thought Police and its Ministry of Love, in Orwell's 1984).
Aiding and abetting crime is a crime. I consequently view all those in the control rooms involved in assisting the criminal psychological harassment against me - as criminals.
On its website, the BTP reports having a CCTV Hub (1) that "gives access to 30,000 cameras" (2)
"We can track individuals in real time where we have intelligence to suspect them"
CCTV Hub Live videos.
(1) Tyco Integrated Systems states/d on its website that it:
"supplied London’s Metropolitan police Service with what is believed to be the World's largest integrated CCTV monitoring and control system...
...taking inputs from CCTV video feeds, ...Transport for London (TfL) cameras, Heathrow Airport, New Scotland Yard and 32 London boroughs...
... and pipe all the information to the special operations centre".
(2) On its website the BTP claims/ed that:
"London Underground operates over 8,500 cameras on its stations and trains" (*) "These cameras are managed and recorded locally, but can be viewed instantly by police control room staff. At London Euston, we have set up a proactive CCTV".
On its website, Transport for London states/d:
"The Tube station network has more than 13,000 CCTV cameras"
(NB: "more than" = ?. When you consider that: (i) 1 bus has 11+ CCTV cameras; (ii) some underground stations appear to have in excess of 60 CCTV cameras EACH...
... - the conclusion is that the total number must be 50,000+ CCTVs. Added to the CCTV cameras in the streets, suggests that the police has access to over 100,000 cameras)
In its Jan 09 Briefing on CCTVs, the Police Foundation reported:
"There are now an estimated 4.2 million CCTV cameras in the UK - one camera for every 14 people. A Londoner is likely to be caught on camera approximately 300 times a day"
In its 22 Feb 12 edition, The Christian Science Monitor reported the civil rights group Big Brother Watch’s claim that:
"Britain has 20 percent of the world’s CCTV cameras and only 1 percent of the world’s population".
(NB: (Typically), key parties who allow this to take place, portray themselves as being 'outraged': My Diary 13 May 08 # 6)
(Note that the British state also records people's conversations in the streets and in taxis, and recycle bins in the streets track people's movements).
At least 11 CCTV cameras on one bus...
...and maybe more (there can also be one next to the driver, and another, externally on the back of the bus) (allowing to see what you do after the bus departs). (This bus is one of the newer version of buses. In this instance, used on route 19)
Outside bus - entry and exit side
Lower deck - front
Lower deck - back
Upper deck - back
Upper deck - front
(During the Olympics, in Aug 12, when I was on a bus, I heard a French woman express shock to her companions about the numerous cameras. One of them replied: "It's scandalous here. Worst country in the world. They have cameras everywhere!". One said: "Do you think they also have them in toilets?", at which they all laughed. I stopped myself from saying: Actually: yes! and if they don't, they'll come and pursue you in the toilets).
That's one of the things that Her Majesty's police does when it wants to get somebody's 'scalp' e.g. Dizaei - and then through the state's goons who are patrolling the area and, in my case, in tandem with Ladsky's 'dogs' - see list of examples above.
Among the numerous irrebutable evidence that supports my conclusion, I also cite:
- (1) The Masons' flunkey who, w/k 2 Mar 11, acting like a monkey, on the obvious order of his masters in the CCTV control room, insulted me on a bus, including calling me "a whore"; "a bloody foreigner who comes here as a freedom fighter", and an assortment of other abusive names. (I was NOT wearing my T-shirt, and I did NOT utter a word). He very clearly did this in the expectation that it would lead to a reaction from me - that would be observed, to feed their craving for a sadistic kick.
- (2) I concluded that the man who tried to hit me, on a bus, on 16 Nov 10, was, likewise, a set-up aimed at satisfying the same VERY SICK objective. This is definitely psycho / lunatic territory!
Of note: from end 2009 until mid/end Aug 2012, when I was using only buses, I could NOT be tracked through my travel pass, as I was using a Senior Freedom Pass, which meant that 99.99% of the time, I simply showed the card to the driver. Since Aug 12, I have been using mostly the underground - for which I need to swipe my card, in and out and, hence, can be tracked (in addition to the myriad of CCTVs on the underground).
(2.6)- It is abundantly clear from the evidence reported, above, under # 2.1, # 2.2, # 2.3 and # 2.4 - that photographs and/or film footage of me have - and continue - to be widely circulated to a vast army of 'Stasi' - including in the CCTV control rooms
I think it is safe to assume from the examples, contained, above, under # 2.1, # 2.2, # 2.3 and # 2.4, added to many others contained in My Diary, that photographs and / or film footage of me (from e.g. CCTV spy centres, above) have, so far, been circulated to more of the state 'Stasi' than have the details of long-standing, known paedophiles (reported in 2012, to be widespread), rapists, would be terrorists, etc. (NB: In fact, one individual officially classified as a potential "terrorist" absconded by jumping in a taxi: QB # 6(1)).
(No doubt, there must be several of me - 'the criminal' - among the 16 millions held on the police database) (under My Diary 13 May 08 # 6)
You would expect the state to circulate the photograph of criminals. But, in this island-Kingdom - that claims:
"If you are a law-abiding citizen of this country going about your business and your personal life you have nothing to fear – nothing to fear about the British state or intelligence agencies listening to the contents of your phone calls or anything like that";
That's how sick and insane this island-Kingdom has become. A Kingdom that has clearly sold out to crime, and is consequently controlled by crime, for the benefit of crime (as very amply demonstrated by, among others, the below summary, under # 6).
(In my case, there is absolutely undeniable evidence of endorsement by the state - at a high level - of what has - and continues to be perpetrated against me).
I add that only the corruptible can be corrupted.
(2.7)- Acting as a kind of 'Interpol for organized crime', through its international network / sending its own UK people (?), the Masonic-'Jewish' network also has me under surveillance when I am overseas e.g.:
(I repeat my above note under 2.1 about my capturing evidence about this in my Witness Statement to the then Home Secretary Theresa May).
EXAMPLES OF EVENTS - which demonstrate criminal psychological harassment by the British state and its cronies and hangers-on:
- 13 Jul 10 - When I was in Orlando. In this instance, coming out of the airplane, I recognised what I concluded was one of the local police mafia. Other examples are comprised under this entry.
- 10 Jun 14 - I believe that I was stalked on a-day-trip to France. (I had booked my trip through email).
- Aug 14 - I was in France for a holiday where, as on previous occasions, I had some Jewish-Freemasons-organised scumbags on my tail - in the process confirming that, yet again, the local police/GCHQ equivalent mafia had ensured the bugging of my family and friends' telephones - at least, during my stay (and probably continued to do so, in case they could get 'something useful').
(2.8)- Operating in tandem with Andrew David Ladsky, the British state is also using plants with the objective of trapping me: 'assessing my state of mind'; attempting to fish information from me; scare me - as well as getting others to do it.
(I repeat my above note under 2.1 about my capturing evidence about this in my Witness Statement to the then Home Secretary Theresa May).
(The use of plants is one of the favourite traps used by the British state e.g. used by the police in the Maxwell and Mansell case (Media page). As demonstrated below, it is, of course, keenly adopted by its criminal hangers-on and cronies).
EXAMPLES OF EVENTS - (I could add numerous others) which demonstrate criminal psychological harassment by the British state and Andrew David Ladsky:
- (3) As ever determined to extort the monies from me, to see what kind of witness statement I would write, the following year, Ladsky had used a plant / done it himself, in an attempt to get me to write a witness statement (Portner # 14)
- (4) In 2007+ - Ladsky sent / had e-mails sent to me under different names - making various claims, aimed at establishing contact with me.
- (6) In 2007 - By KPMG: use of 'my colleagues' to fish out information from me; 'assess my state of mind' me e.g. (1)- by my line manager, Ceri Hughes: KPMG # 6(3), # 8.4; (2)- shortly after a friend of mine arrived in London (on 25 Oct 07), because the state goons that monitored us and hounded us, had not managed to get the information they wanted / 'needed', Hughes had a temp probe me over a made-up 'interest' in doing bodyguard work.
- (8) In Nov 08, I concluded that an individual had been recruited to scare me into employing a cost draftsman, for the purpose of claiming back my costs, as well as compensation - following the fraudulent 27 Feb 07 claim (Overview # 11) filed against me. Had I done so, in the light of the follow-on events (Overview # 12), it would have provided the tormentors with an even bigger sadistic kick.
- (12) 20 May 10 (reported in My Diary 6 Aug 12) - With the objective of befriending me, Ladsky, with the help of his flunkeys in the police / GCHQ (by giving him my e-mails, as well as e-mail address of my correspondents - see below), had set-up 2 female plants at a meeting I attended on 20 May 10 - one of which was a decoy, to help the other one establish 'credibility'.
- (13) 13 Feb 13 - On a bus, use of a man, by the Ladsky gang - state 'Stasi' with, I concluded, the objective of, in particular, determining what I would say about 'Jews' (as per e.g. in 2008), as well as 'assess my state of mind'.
- (The mafia was so desperate to get information from me that, concurrently, it set-up 2 other schemes - that FAILED: 5 Nov 13 following intercepting 1 of my emails; 10 Nov 13 re. prepping up a plant).
- (17) 12 Oct 15 - The Ladsky mafia found another scum prepared to do its bidding - revealing the extremely vicious and slanderous lies it is (typically) spreading about me: "I am liable to pay for the [fraudulent] service charges".
(NB: Ladsky (among many others!) is so desperate to 'get me' (e.g. his 3 Jan 03 comment: "I am going to get you this year!") that, in 2010, he even sent some of his flunkeys to philosophy discussions I attended at the French Institute - that were in French - which they very clearly could not speak, and therefore understand).
(3)- Persecution: 'surveillance': the British state ALSO monitors, as well as interferes with ALL my means of communication, as well as bugs / ensures the bugging of my apartment
In addition to the above 'surveillance', the psycho British state 'Stasi' is also:
(1) monitoring and interfering with ALL my means of communication:
- phones, including interception and retention of important voicemails; the interference also includes public phones;
- hacking into my computer to access files, my non-public website files, etc.;
(2) bugging / ensuring the bugging of my apartment.
(See the above NOTE, re. evidence adding (if required) credence to my below reporting involvement by the British state).
NOTE also that human rights groups do NOT escape interception of their communications.
"GCHQ's surveillance of two human rights groups ruled illegal by tribunal", The Guardian, 22 Jun 15
BUT: "Initial interceptions lawful but retention and examination of communications illegal..."
"The tribunal made "no determination" on the claims...implying that either their emails and phone calls were not intercepted or that they were intercepted but by legal means"
"Amnesty International said "today's ruling tells us nothing. We still don't know if we've been spied on at all,..." (1)
"...Knowing that your mail has been read, or your calls have been listened to can stifle people into silence, leading to self-censorship  It is a clear interference with basic rights such as free expression and right to privacy"
EXAMPLES OF EVENTS re. MY MOBILE PHONES - which demonstrate criminal psychological harassment by the British state and its cronies and hangers-on:
1 - In Oct-Nov 07, a solicitor I contacted (to discuss events with my then employer, KPMG) (KPMG # 10.1) had very clearly been approached: (1)- I saw him several days after booking the appointment; (2)- having first obtained case information from me - 2 weeks later - he claimed that he had "a conflict of interest", because he had been "advising somebody at KPMG".
Having stated this, as he was repeating "I should not be talking to you" , he was nonetheless trying to extract more information from me I considered as evidence in support of my position.
(If this contact was not identified as a result of listening to my telephone conversations, then I was followed to his office = either way: I am - unlawfully - under 'surveillance'.
Actually, given events, there 'might' be option # 3: this solicitor contacted KPMG - because I am one of the 'little people' v. one of the pillars of the Establishment).
(Other evidence in support: (1)- re. KPMG, see also events with (i)- my ex. doctor in Apr 08 (KPMG # 13(1));
(ii)- the 'specialist' I saw in May 08 (KPMG # 13(2)); (iii)- the so-called 'specialist' it forced me to see on 10 Apr 07 (KPMG # 5).
(2)- re. Ladsky and 'the Brotherhood': (i)- the same 'specialist' I saw in May 08 ; (ii)- the deal evidently made between 'my' legal advisors and Ladsky in 2003: Gallagher-Summary of events).
2 - In Oct 07, it is abundantly clear that the conversations I had, and text messages I exchanged with my friend, for the purpose of meeting him, had been intercepted i.e. LISTENED TO / READ.
3. Oct 08 - Jan 09 - The 'games' played by Hutchison 3G, the 3 network mobile phone provider over a 4-month period, starting in Oct 08, leading me to involve Ofcom - that finally led to Hutchison 3G supplying me with the PAC number in its 22.01.09 letter. (Doc library # 5.9 and # 5.10)
Of course, its CEO, Kevin Russell, ignored my asking, in my 29.12.08 letter, who had put him up to doing this.
Why should Hutchison 3G play these games? What took place was certainly not about preventing a high-spending customer from leaving the 3G network, as I hardly ever use my phone – because I know that whatever I do with it is being listened to / intercepted / interfered with.
- Add to that, in the previous year, the logo Vodafone appearing on my Word documents from which I conclude - as a non-expert - that my computer was being hacked into - see below, computer. Another 'fascinating' event also took place with my mobile phone when it was on the Vodafone network [ADD] .
5 - On 2 Jan 09, the message "Nothing to display" was sent on my other mobile phone (phone # 2), under the name of friends in France. They did NOT send this message (which, in any case they would have written in French).
On receiving it, I concluded that it was intended to worry me about my website - and took no action.
Earlier on that day, a 'message' was left on my mobile, clearly intended to scare me - see My Diary 2 Jan 09
= Other examples of the EXTREMELY SICK psyches I am facing in this country.
6 - Feb 10 - Indication that Hutchison 3G's successor, O2, got 'on board': I was NOT getting messages on my voicemail for mobile phone # 1. It included a message from one of my Cousins that her Father had died, so that I could attend the funeral - PROVING that the voicemail had been LISTENED TO. (As detailed below, her email to me was intercepted, and so was her express letter to me).
My Cousin also said that she tried to leave a message on my mobile phone # 2, but she was not sure whether she had succeeded, as she could not understand the recording. I did NOT get a message.
Mar 10 - Using a public telephone - I phoned my Cousin in Paris to report events with her voicemail message (and her letter (below)). A few days after this conversation, when I switched on mobile phone # 2 (for the first time since talking to my Cousin from a phone box), within 2 minutes, it alerted me of a voicemail, by sending me a text message.
It had stopped doing this a while back e.g. after leaving the phone switched on for c.20-30 minutes (which I was doing as a test), no alert would come through. Yet, on some occasions, when I phoned the voicemail service, I found a message. As to phone # 1, it had evidently been decided that 'some' messages should come through to me.
7 - July 10 - I proved to be right about 3's successor. It's O2. In his 13.07.10 letter, the Parliamentary Ombudsman caseworker said that he had been trying to phone me over the previous month and did not get a dial tone. (NB: Preceding events with the PHSO and 'my' then MP Malcolm Rifkind, demonstrate that it had been planned - as part of the criminal psychological harassment regime).
I tried the phone on 22 July, and could not get a dial tone. However, I had received a text 10 days earlier, and the voicemail did not give any indication that my phone had been disconnected. I went to an O2 store on 22 July. Having borrowed one of their phones in which I placed my SIM card, on calling the number, it 'miraculously' rang. One minute later a text from O2 said that it was sending me the settings for my phone - hence as though it was the first time that I was using O2 = my phone had been disconnected.
Likely trigger? 'R E T R I B U T I O N'! At the time, for my 'daring' to continue fighting with the police in relation to the FALSE, highly vicious, malicious, and defamatory so-called "crime reports" it is processing against me.
8 - 12 Mar 14 - My conversation setting-up to meet a friend had, 'of course', been listened to, as one of 'the Luftwaffe' flew quite low over us as we arrived in the main street in Chinatown.
9 - 14 Jun 14 - my conversation with a plumber had clearly been listened to - and seized upon, by having the British thug parade his implied death threat in front of my windows (film and photos).
10 - Jun & Aug/Sep 14 - Within 5 minutes of switching on my phone, 2 'calls' came through that turned out to be a recorded message about 'help re. bankruptcy'. I concluded that it was linked with my interfering with the mafia's plan in early 2014 to dispossess me -unlawfully - of my apartment.
11 - 10 Feb 15 - Home Office psychos, (in cahoots with O2, the mobile phone provider?) had, evidently, a need to add to their sadistic kicks: they chopped a message left on my mobile phone voicemail - leaving only the beginning and the end of the message.
12 - 15 May 15 - A text message stated that 'I had a voicemail'. When I accessed the voicemail service, there was NO message.
(I repeat my NOTE about the phone companies having staff on the Home Office's payroll (below)).
(NB: The police and other state parties have particularly strong links with the mobile phone companies e.g. media articles:
"Phone firms net £9m for giving data to the police", Mail on Sunday, 14 Dec 08
"The companies keep records of the numbers contacted, times, dates, duration of mobile phone calls but not the actual contents of conversation.
They also hold crucial information about the whereabouts of a mobile phone at any given time - which can be accessed by the police to build up a picture of a suspect's movements...
Police can see the phone records without having to apply to the courts, with senior offices issuing a Section 22 notice under the powerful Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act...
Last year, Section 22 powers were exercised more than 500,000 times... the Home Office paid the phone companies and internet firms almost £19 million in the past four years to store customer information. The amount paid rocketed from £84,582 in 2004 to £8,346,495 in 2007"
At this point, I had written: 'NB: Since then, Operation Tempora will have done away with that 'need'. In fact: "BT and Vodafone among telecoms companies passing details to GCHQ", Guardian, 2 Aug 13'.
More detail has come to light since: "EE, Vodafone and Three give police mobile call records at click of a mouse", The Guardian, 10 Oct 14. AND:
"...the staff within phone companies who deal with RIPA [below] and other requests are often in effect paid by the Home Office - a fact confirmed by several networks."
Perhaps they come under the control of the Home Office's Office of Counter Terrorism and Security? (I came across the name in Private Eye's # 1384, 23 Jan-5 Feb 15, pg 11)
Private Eye, # 1377, 17-30 Oct 14, pg 7 - "It's good to stalk
"Edward Snowden’s leaks have revealed that BT serves as “the main intercept partner” for online and phone traffic as it enters Britain from America, and all the major telecom companies including BT “are paid substantially by the British taxpayer” for their “corporate cooperation”.
That is according to Guardian reporter Luke Harding’s The Snowden Files, the authorised book about the whistleblower’s revelations, which was published this summer."
"Minister in cahoots with mobile phone firms on price fixing", Mail on Sunday, 27 Apr 08
“Culture Minister Margaret Hodge was last night accused of being in cahoots with the mobile industry amid allegations that one of her aides suggested a champagne celebration with Vodafone after the company defeated moves to cut its charges.
Viviane Reding, the European Union’s telecoms commissioner, said she warned Mrs Hodge that the British people would be ‘very upset indeed… if they found out what was happening behind closed doors’”
(I repeat my above note under 2.1 about my capturing evidence about this in my Witness Statement to the then Home Secretary Theresa May).
EXAMPLES OF EVENTS re. PHONE BOXES - which demonstrate criminal psychological harassment by the British state:
- (1) 7 Jul 11 - In the course of a conversation (on a public phone at my ex .university, I had used previously), the state 'Stasi' evidently 'did not like' what I was saying to a contact, as it forced me to end the conversation, by preventing me from putting in any more coins.
- (2) 4 Aug 08 - To make the appointment to see the 'specialist', I used a phone box on the Brompton Road (near 'the concentration camp'). In the light of what took place on 7 Aug 08, and subsequently, it is clear that the number was retrieved from the phone box / the conversation had been listened to.
- (3) 2007 - Aiming to let me talk as much as possible to one of my contacts, the money I had placed in the phone box (near 'the concentration camp'), was not being used up. As soon as I commented on this, my credit started to run down.
(3) Internet café's telephones
The below events relate to my private P.O. Boxes.
I initially set-up a PO Box with the Post Office, because my post was intercepted at the Jefferson House 'concentration camp'. YES, it IS a criminal offence. Where can I go and file a complaint? Only option: Her Majesty's Kensington & Chelsea police!!!!
It led me into a 3-year ongoing battle with the Post Office (snaphots of events: Doc library # 5.7 and # 5.8).
It became so bad (e.g. on 2 Nov 06, 9 out of the 12 letters I was given did not belong to me - leading me to wonder where MY post had gone to) that, on 7 Nov 06, I set-up a private PO Box. Considering what has taken place subsequently with my post, my conclusion is that it was part of the Stasi style tormenting regime.
The interception of my post can only take place at 2 points: (1) sorting office; (2) at my PO Box. The private PO Box I initially set-up is located in the area of the Jefferson House 'concentration camp'.
On 2 occasions, I raised the issue with the PO Box manager. He assured me that NOBOBY was interfering with my post. Because of the nature of the items intercepted, I excluded the fact that the manager might have been issued with a warrant (RIPA: s.3, s.5, s.7 and s.11) - and, concurrently, gagged from revealing it (pursuant to s.19 of the Act).
Up to Jun 14 (I have since changed my mind: Notices 2 of # 6), I followed this by stating that: "the manager is not a psycho, getting kicks from inflicting criminal psychological harassment, who would respond to the diktats of one or more corrupt psychos in the Masonic network. (See my SUMMARY SLIDE below as to the obvious content of 'the interception warrants'), and that....
...This leaves the state-controlled sorting office - that might be particularly willing to comply with the diktats from the local police Masons' flunkeys in interfering with my post - because of my above 3-year running battle with the sorting office, and the 'little people' who 'dare' complain against any state employee will be 'taught a lesson' / persecuted - and, as under e.g. the Stasi, put on a widely circulated blacklist.
On 7 and 8 Sep 11, I went to the local sorting office. Requiring 24hrs to determine the 'appropriate reply' - the manager, of course, denied intercepting my post...and put the blame on my PO Box provider!
At the end of 2011, I set-up another PO Box, on the other side of town, so that a different sorting office would be involved. As evidenced by what took place with e.g. the below, 18 Jan 12 letter from the Revenue - the benefit was short lived. (The public sector's blacklists are circulated far and wide!).
Involvement or not by the managers at my PO Box, the conclusion is the same: the British state IS - ALSO - behind the - unlawful - interception of my post. Concurrently, the very sick, evil psychos get their sadistic kicks from seeing me having to make all these trips to 'perhaps' get my post.
(In the context of the following examples of theft of my post by the Masonic police and its flunkies, I draw your attention to the fact that there is absolutely no limit as to what the police will do - as demonstrated by e.g. its theft of the identity of dead children).
(I repeat my above note under 2.1 about my capturing evidence about this in my Witness Statement to the then Home Secretary Theresa May).
EXAMPLES OF EVENTS re. MY POST - which demonstrate criminal psychological harassment by the British state:
1. Mar 10 - Having intercepted the e-mail, as well as voicemail message/s from one of my Cousins that her Father had died so that I could attend the funeral, her '3-day express' letter to me from France was also intercepted.
Evidence: as can be seen from the envelop, the letter was posted on Tuesday 2 Mar 10, and states "Guaranteed delivery within 3 days". Hence, I should have received it at the latest by Friday 5th March. I went to my PO BOx on Sunday 7th March: the letter was NOT there. I only found it in my PO Box on my next visit, by which time: YES, my Uncle's funeral had already taken place.
The content of the letter could be easily guessed by the 'Gestapo' that is behind the interception of ALL my means of communication - from the interception of my Cousin's voicemail/s (above), and e-mail (below), as well as the fact that my Cousin wrote her address on the envelop – and this address is stored on my mobile phones - hence, can be taken (e.g. data extraction by the police). Further, I have been dogged when I stayed with my Cousins.
2. Feb 10 - ‘Matthew Johnson’, the IPCC caseworker, sent me a 22.02.10 letter, posted 1st class on Tuesday 23rd Feb, in which, dictatorially, ‘he’ gave me "one week to reply from the date of the letter" (police # 5.4 / QB # 5(2)). The letter was intercepted as, by Sunday 28th Feb, it was NOT in my PO Box. I only found it in my PO Box the following week – past the deadline for reply (police # 5.4).
(NB: Exactly one week after sending me the above, 'Matthew Johnson' sent me a 02.03.10 letter dismissing my complaint).
How 'fascinating' that a letter - with implication on Her Majesty's Kensington, Chelsea & Notting Hill police - gets intercepted and withheld. (This was repeated in Aug 11, below).
3. In Nov 10, HM Revenue claimed to have sent me a cheque for tax refund. It was finally delivered more than 7 months later. Of course, my not receiving it meant I had to engage in some considerable chasing - which was, of course, the objective.
4. My bank statements and statements of other accounts have, and continue (below) to be intercepted i.e. stolen.
- My Jun 11 monthly bank statement was in my PO Box 3 weeks after the expected date. I never received my July 11 bank statement. It has forced me to make alternative, and obviously, inconvenient arrangements.
- I have NOT received many statements, and other private and confidential communications in relation to my savings accounts.
5. Following filing my 19 Apr 11 Claim against the police - as I had anticipated, I did NOT get the Notices of Issue. I kept going to my PO Box - in vain. I opted to wait until the last day for one of the Defendants to have filed its acknowledgment of service before going to the court. The court said to have sent me the document. It gave me a copy. (My Diary 10 May 11)
6. The 02.08.11 police Draft Order, sent to me by the court on that day, a Tuesday, by 1st class post, was only delivered on Friday 5th. It is abundantly clear that it had been intercepted with the aim of giving me no time to respond - see Queen's Bench # (4)(5).
It was a repeat of what took place with the (above) 22 Feb 10 letter 'from' the IPCC - another communication that concerned the police.
7. In what I assume was 'retribution' for the (clearly unexpected) content of my 17.10.11 Request for Oral Hearing of my 30.08.11 Application for Permission to Appeal (QB # 4(7)) against the PACK OF LIES 09.08.11 MPS Order (QB # 4(6) ; summaries: Events ; Breaches of the law) - over a period of 3 weeks, the police intercepted ALL of my post and, of course, kept it (My Diary 20 Nov 11).
8. A letter from the Revenue, dated 18.01.12, took 4 months to reach me. (Note the prior one, above, that took 7 months). The stamp on the envelop states: "Condition 9 Access Mail. Received out of course 19 May 2012 at Maidstone Mail Centre".
Where was this letter in the previous 4 months? It was clearly intercepted and retained, then placed in a post that would end-up in Maidstone... with a stamp that would lead me to wonder what had happened. Yep! definitely psycho territory - based on the Stasi model. (NB: As explained above, I set-up a new PO Box at the end of 2011. It means that some Masons' flunkeys have, yet again, been recruited).
9. The British state intercepted letters from the European Court of Human Rights - and ensured that I could be in no doubt that it had:
- (2) 19 Feb 13 letter from the Secretary General of the Council of Europe - that was delivered nearly 1 month later.
Also OF NOTE: Andrew David Ladsky was immediately informed of my correspondence to the court, and higher up (a continuation of what the British state does following my correspondence to institutions): My Diary: 26 Feb 12 ; 18 Jan 13.
10. From the end of May 12, Her Majesty's police et.al. in the British state were repeating the same thing: stealing ALL my post (My Diary 18 Jun 12).
11. Her Majesty's police et.al. in the British state continue to steal my financial post:
- At 27 Jul 12 - For many months, I had NOT received ANY of my financial post. I KNOW FOR A FACT that I should have received some.
- 9 May 14 - To add to their sadistic kicks, they intercepted some of my financial post and returned it claiming that "[I was] unknown at the address".
12. 12 Jun 14 - With the objective of assisting the criminal psychological harassment against me - my local PO Box withheld a 'Special delivery' letter from me - for 12 days. Another one to be added to the already very long list (My Diary # 2.4)!
13. Early Oct 14 - At least 2 letters were intercepted and retained from one of my insurance companies - leaving me unknowingly without insurance cover for c. 2 years.
14. Apr 15 - Knowing that I was expecting a communication from friends in Cyprus following my sending them a parcel, their 'thank you' card was intercepted and retained.
Is there anybody who is not going "to sell their soul to the devil"?
WHAT is the corrupt vermin (*) police doing with my financial statements?
(*) I repeat my Comments under (1)(4), above.
• Giving them to its master, 'Dear Mr Ladsky', to help him determine the size of the fraudulent, upon fraudulent demands he can send me?
I view this as ' Fair comment' (until 2013) - taking into account e.g.
• Given Andrew Ladsky's and his gang of racketeers' propensity to use imposters in an attempt to make me pay money I do NOT owe (e.g. Portner and Jaskel # 14), he has - perhaps - also been given my Birth Certificate by the Pension Service (My Diary 12 May 12),...
and intends to use these documents to steal the money from my accounts? (In the light of the evidence in the case, I contend that this is, likewise, a 'Fair comment' question).
• Gave them to its 'brothers' in the Queen's Bench Division to determine the amount of costs they could order me to pay? (QB: # 4(6) , # 5(7) , # 6(2) / Overview # 18.2) (Ditto re. 'Fair comment)
EXANPLES OF EVENTS re. MY EMAILS - which demonstrate criminal psychological harassment by the British state - and concurrently the British state's lies of 'not reading e-mails', as well as its sham 'laws':
(1) - In Feb 10, one of my Cousins desperately tried to contact me to let me know that her Father had died, so that I could attend the funeral in France. She sent me an e-mail. I did NOT receive it. (She had been sending me e-mails on this address for several years).
(As reported above), she also left voicemail/s on my mobile phones. I did NOT get it/them. She sent me a '3-day express delivery' letter, I did NOT get it until after the funeral had taken place.
(1.A) - May 10 - A conclusion I could not report at the time, but can do in Aug 12, is that Her Majesty's police / GCHQ are undeniably giving my e-mails / the content of my e-mails to Andrew David Ladsky - including the e-mail address of my correspondents - to help him set-up traps for me: My Diary 6 Aug 12
(2) - In Nov 10, somebody sent me a one-line e-mail asking me to contact him. I did NOT receive it. I had warned him that this might happen, and to do it as a test - and not rely on this as a means of contacting me. (The person had the correct e-mail address, and the e-mail was NOT bounced back).
When I saw him, I told him that he should send me another e-mail, and that, as the tactic had failed to prevent me from establishing contact with him, I thought that the second test e-mail would probably reach me. It did!
In other words: important e-mails are intercepted. (See Criminal psychological harassment)
(3) - 14 Apr 12 - Her Majesty's British Transport police demonstrated that it, and its mates who intercepted - and read - my e-mail, 'did not like' my reply to a friend's joke e-mail, that he forgot to add: ‘the many corrupt elements in the police and judiciary who run a protection racket and retribution service for their criminal ‘brothers’ i.e. Masons’...
...- as, in the evening, it 'escorted' me to the bus stop by helicopter. Translation of 'escorted me': hounded me and harassed me over a period of 7 minutes (My Diary 14 Apr 12 / # 8, above). This is psycho territory!
(4) - Late Mar 13 - I never received an e-mail from my website Host giving me a new number to access its server. Knowing that it would cause me a problem, one of CS Adrian Roberts-controlled local police Masons' flunkeys arrived a few minutes after me in the internet café.
By then, I was close to leaving. He sat next to me - barely able to hide his glee. He then turned to me 'asking for help' in doing something (!!! = typical psycho psyche. These people are SICK beyond words).
(NB: This is the same internet café where another one of the local police Masons' flunkeys tried to catch me out, by telling me: "Hitler should have killed them [Jews] all, don't you think?")
(5) - 5 Nov 13 - About 10 days previously, I replied to somebody's e-mail invitation to attend Bonfire night (5 Nov) at Trafalgar Sq, starting from c. 18h - that I "would aim to come". I did not go.
On that day, as I was on the 6th floor of the - private - library of my ex.uni, an unmistakable police goon (early 40s, tall, wearing a dark colour leather blouson), came on the floor, looked at me, and then left. My guess: something had been set-up, in anticipation of my going.
(The previous occasion the police was given access to the - private - library in connection with me, was on 7 Jun 11, in order to harass me).
(The mafia was so desperate to get information from me that, concurrently, it set-up 2 other schemes - that FAILED: (1) Ladsky set-up another plant (# 2.8, above) / 6 Nov 13 ; (2) I concluded from the following day's show by 'the Luftwaffe Stasi terrorists' that the main plant at a meeting had been prepped up to get information from me: 10 Nov 13).
(6) - 31 Mar 14 - As I was typing an e-mail, my visual about computer hacking (# 3.4, below), as well as what was by then, the previous overall header to my website - were inserted into the e-mail.
7 - In Apr 14, the psychos used a 2013 email from a friend of mine who wished me my birthday - to send birthday wishes...3 months outside the actual date! Seeing the blatant trick, I just deleted it.
(8) - 19 Aug 14 - Through a friend, I discovered that 2 mutual friends had each sent me an e-mail on that day, setting out plans - which I never received. However, the psycho GCHQ and police 'Stasi' let one e-mail go through in which one of these friends talked about 'being unable to change plans'. = proof, yet again, of the British state's lies of 'not reading e-mails', as well as its sham 'laws'.
(9) - 28 May 16 - From monitoring - and reading - my emails, Her Majesty's "fantastically corrupt" police-GCHQ communicated to the Ladsky mafia that I was going to France on holiday.
The mafia, specifically, Martyn Gerrard, seized on the opportunity to add to the criminal psychological harassment, by ensuring that on the day of my departure I received its previous fraudulent demand - to which it added "penalty charges for non-payment".
(I repeat my above note under 2.1 about my capturing evidence about this in my Witness Statement to the then Home Secretary Theresa May).
In 2007, when I was using the Vodafone 3G card (my own, rather than KPMG's), on my personal computer, as can be seen from this photograph, the Vodafone logo ended-up appearing instead of the Microsoft 'W' when viewing my Word documents in directory view. (The blue block is superimposed to block-out the name of my files).
I immediately stopped using the card. While I cannot explain this event - the technology exists to hack into computers see My Diary 13 Apr 08.
Further, in addition to (then) being a KPMG client, Vodafone also has a particularly 'good relationship' with ministers (e.g. above article). Also with HM Revenue & Customs that allows it to get away with massive handouts (BVI # 4) (like KPMG).
(NB: My conclusion, in 2007, of the British state being involved was strengthened:
I also know that, since 2007, my computer has also been hacked into.
Among others, it took place in February 2014, with the CS Adrian Roberts-controlled Kensington police mafia playing a key part in events - and Rachman Andrew David Ladsky clearly in the loop:...
... BY, among other (?) hacking into my computer, the British state attempted to delete my website. It also caused other problems - in order to prevent access. (Note that the British state has given itself the right to do that).
In 2007, the same local police also attempted to get the closure of my website by sending highly malicious, vicious, scurrilous and xenophobic emails to my website Host: police # 3(4).
(3.5)- BUGGING OF MY APARTMENT (FLAT)
EXAMPLES OF EVENTS re. BUGGING MY APARTMENT
I am convinced that my flat is bugged / wired like a Christmas tree - for the following reasons:
- These are photos I took, in May 10, of 'objects' inside the ceilings of my apartment. The one on the left, the 'object' had recently been placed there as it had no dust on it. The one on the right looks like an antenna.
- On one occasion, in c. 2008, as I was sitting on my bed, when I provoked 'them' by saying that some of them will have a horrible death, a wire was immediately rattled in the ceiling. As can be seen from the above, there is a large gap in parts of the (flimsy) ceilings to my apartment. (Jefferson House is a converted block).
- I concluded that there is some sort of opening from one of the apartments next to mine (or at least, there was), at a height that is comprised within the ceiling to my apartment (My Diary Jan / Feb 04).
- In 2009-10, on 2-3 occasions, I saw a man, short, in his 30s, he appeared to me to be of Jewish origin, coming into that apartment late at night, carrying some kind of briefcase. He would stay for c. 10 minutes and then leave.
- Once, I challenged him; he said something along the line of 'not to worry, he was not doing anything wrong'. I heard him on several other occasions when he did the same thing i.e. stay for c.10 minutes, and saw him from my window.
- Since c. 2008, and especially since 2009-10, I have noted that sound reverberates in my apartment: in the kitchen, bathroom and bedroom area. For example, I noted that 'the sensitivity of the recording' appeared to have been turned up on the day I took delivery of the £24,000 (US$42,320) 'service charge' demand (My Diary 13 Jul 10 / Martyn Gerrard - Background).
- In 'her' 31.07.06 letter to me, Joan Hathaway, MRICS, MRJ, wanted to get access to my apartment "In order to test the fire alarm system". There is NOTHING connected with a fire alarm system in my apartment. My take on this: it was an excuse to get access to the inside of the ceilings to my apartment.
- It seems that 'a solution' was found as, following the failed attempt to flood my apartment on 6 Feb 07, the ceiling in the corridor was dismantled in 2009-10 - giving ease of access to the inside of my ceilings.
- A very large gap remained opened for several weeks. As I am out of the hellhole all day, 7/7, and do not return until late in the evening (as can be seen from e.g. the timing of the events I report under # 2, above), because I absolutely hate it, I do not know what was done.
- (At end of June 13: some holes have been made in the ceiling of the corridor; pieces of electric wire are dangling from some of them).
- There may/may not be a connection with this one: sometime in 2009-10, I saw one of the local police 'SS' come out of the Jefferson House 'concentration camp' (his face is etched in my memory). As he was at the bottom of the steps to the entrance, he said, looking up towards the entrance door "Don't worry, I've made sure it can't be found".
- On 6 Oct 11, and 26 Feb 12, when psycho Ladsky communicated his frustration and anger at: my 'daring' to respond to a survey; make an Application to the ECtHR - by stomping his feet repeatedly with great force - he demonstrated that he knew exactly where I was in the apartment.
(NB: I have come across another victim of injustice, also a woman, who believes that her apartment is bugged - My Diary 21 Jul 10. No doubt, like me, she is portrayed as "mad"; "suffering from mental issues")
My instincts tell me that, since at least 2009-10 - in addition to and/or as a replacement to Andrew Ladsky's intrusive surveillance of my apartment, the police is also involved in that intrusive surveillance. WHY? For the examples of reasons outlined above.
As to Her Majesty's Kensington, Chelsea & Notting police in particular, in addition to its treatment of me since 2002 v. of Ladsky, I cite that, in an attempt to 'get the scalp' of one of its own, the police rented an apartment next to his. In my case, Andrew Ladsky, the police's protégé, controls the Jefferson House 'concentration camp'.
It leads me to conclude that, in addition to the surveillance and interception of my phone conversations, voicemails and text messages; my post; my e-mails - the British state is also conducting - unlawful - intrusive surveillance of my apartment.
(3.5)- WHO are the assassins in Kensington & Chelsea police and higher up in the Metropolitan Police Service who are orchestrating these, as well as above actions against me?
(4)- Blatant, ongoing abuse of power by the British state - in total disregard of legislation - leaving me with nowhere to turn to for help and protection.
Sections - BREACH OF LEGISLATION
Comprehensive extracts of some of the legislation referred to under this section i.e. # 4, are contained in this document: Extracts law 19 Apr 11 Claim. See also the below introduction, re. 'surveillance' legislation.
As stated on numerous occasions on this website - I AM NOT (a qualified) LAWYER. However, I contend that it does not require being a lawyer, or a genius, to see that the legislation has and, in many instances - continues to be breached.
Needless to say that the actions - aimed at inflicting psychological harassment - undertaken:
• By the British state (list of parties under e.g. below; My Diary 25 Jan 12) - are in breach of numerous legislation. Of these, I highlight, in particular, the ongoing, repeated violations of several Articles in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms 1950 (as set out in Sch.1 of the Human Rights Act 1998):
- Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (see extracts) (= numerous criminal offences) - including breach of s.7(3A) by wilfully aiding and abetting the harassment by Andrew Ladsky.
• By Andrew David Ladsky and his gang of racketeers - who are in breach of a very large array of legislation - to which the British state has - and continues - to persistently turn a blind eye to - demonstrating that Ladsky has the run of this island-Kingdom:
- Under EXTORTION, a link is provided to the legislation breached.
And, of course, I have discussed them endlessly (IN VAIN) in my complaints to the so-called 'regulators' e.g. Overview # 7.
• By other parties e.g. Malicious Communications Act 1988 ; Protection from Harassment Act 1997.
Following the surveillance revelations disclosed by the US National Security Agency (NSA)'s whistleblower Edward Snowden - reported in the Guardian in Jun 13: "The NSA files" e.g.
... WILLIAM HAGUE, then Foreign Secretary, made numerous claims in the media and in Parliament. In the light of my very comprehensive first-hand experience, I contend that many of his claims are false.
Consequently, I also hold the SAME view about David Cameron's claim, endorsing those of his minister, that "British spies act in a "proper and fitting" way because of tight controls on their snooping powers": "David Cameron: we can be sure British spies keep within the law", Telegraph, 10 Jun 13. (NB: Even "the British spies" describe "the tight controls" as "light"!)
Hence, theoretically: BOTH misled Parliament. In practice: many already knew what was going on: Operation Tempora.
(*) Note subsequent Guardian articles, on 2 Aug 13: "BT and Vodafone among telecoms companies passing details to GCHQ" ; "GCHQ accused of selling its services after revelations of funding by NSA"
(NB: Of course, there has been the usual meaningless one-liner of 'shock-horror' from Keith Vaz, Chair of the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee: "I am astonished by these revelations which could involve the data of thousands of Britons", Telegraph, 7 Jun 13). (Contrast that with the fact that his party, Labour, had set-up the mega-database).
I discuss the specifics of the legislation, below, under # 4.2 re. my being hounded, etc., on a daily basis, and # 4.3 re. interference with ALL my means of communication - and refer to their claims.
The below comments and claims are from William Hague. They are sourced from the following Guardian material:
"If you are a law-abiding citizen of this country going about your business and your personal life you have nothing to fear – nothing to fear about the British state or intelligence agencies listening to the contents of your phone calls or anything like that.
But if you are a would-be terrorist or the centre of a criminal network or a foreign intelligence agency trying to spy on Britain you should be worried because that is what we work on and we are, on the whole, quite good at it."
"[Referring to GCHQ, MI5 and MI6] Intelligence-gathering in this country is governed by a very strong legal framework so that we get the balance right between the liberties and privacy of people and the security of the country"
"That provides not for trawling through the contents of people's phone calls. It provides for intelligence gathering that is authorised, necessary, proportionate and targeted on what we really need to know."
"At its heart are the Intelligence Services Act of 1994 and the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act [RIPA] of 2000."
"It relies on a combination of a warrant from a secretary of state and checks from an independent commissioner, as well as checks from the intelligence and security committee - providing one of the strongest systems of checks and balances and democratic accountability for secret intelligence anywhere in the world."
"Communications surveillance vital to counter terrorism, say UK agencies", Guardian, 10 Jun 13: "GCHQ in Cheltenham, the government's communications headquarters, has the capacity to tap every mobile phone in Britain.
Sometimes it targets an individual when there are grounds to suspect he or she is involved in terrorism, serious crime or other activities covered by the very broad criteria laid down in the 1994 Intelligence Services Act."
In fact, as was revealed 10 days later, it "taps" more than "every mobile phone in Britain":
"GCHQ taps fibre-optic cables for secret access to world's communications", Guardian, 21 Jun 13 - "GCHQ has secretly gained access to the network of cables which carry the world's phone calls and internet traffic.
This includes recordings of phone calls, the content of email messages, entries on Facebook and the history of any internet user's access to websites." "The information went straight into the Tempora storage programme". (1)
"The Guardian understands that a total of 850,000 NSA employees and US private contractors with top secret clearance had access to GCHQ databases."
"The Americans were told in legal briefings by GCHQ lawyers: "We have a light oversight regime compared with the US". 
"There is an investigatory powers tribunal to look into complaints that the data gathered by GCHQ has been improperly used, but the agency reassured NSA analysts in the early days of the programme, in 2009: "So far they have always found in our favour"" (3)
"Leaked memos reveal GCHQ efforts to keep mass surveillance secret", Guardian, 25 Oct 13 - "GCHQ lobbied furiously to keep secret the fact that telecoms firms had gone "well beyond" what they were legally required to do to help intelligence agencies' mass interception of communications, both in the UK and overseas." (4)
And - one year later: "Vodafone reveals existence of secret wires that allow state surveillance", The Guardian, 6 Jun 14 (5)
Private Eye, 1368 – 13-26 Jun 14, pg 29 – "Eye Spy – From GCHQ with love…" - "New document from Edward Snowden…show how Britain’s GCHQ has been involved in developing “implants”.
The pieces of malware then “own” the target’s hardware and can read email, turn on a computer’s microphone as a transportable bug or the webcam to take photos, as well as download huge amounts of data.
Such widespread snooping could be done on millions of computers, according to NASA, which describes it as “aggressive”
(NB: Note also, above, that: (1) the phone companies have staff on the Home Office's payroll; (2) "BT acts as the main intercept partner").
"To intercept the content of any individual's communications in the UK requires a warrant signed personally by me, the home secretary, or by another secretary of state.
This is no casual process. Every decision is based on extensive legal and policy advice.
Warrants are legally required to be necessary, proportionate and carefully targeted, and we judge them on that basis."
As the Guardian points out: "The key word here is "content".
MI5 and the police secured 2,300 warrants last year for information contained in the messages and emails of Britons. Those kind of interceptions require ministerial approval."
"All the authorisations the home secretary and I give are subject to independent review by an intelligence services commissioner and an interception of communications commissioner, both of whom report directly to the prime minister."
"The ISC's work is one part of the strong framework of democratic accountability and oversight that governs the use of secret intelligence in the UK."
The ISC was chaired by 'my' then MP, Sir Malcolm Rifkind. In my 07.03.09 'cry for help' to him (Rifkind # 1) (not knowing his role at the time), on:
- pg 1, line 14 of my letter, I asked: ". 4. Determine why I am under surveillance by the police - and put an end to it";
- pg 13, lines 35 and 36:
"By early 2006, I had become very angry at being monitored and hounded as though I am a terrorist, as well as being physically threatened"
As with everything else - Rifkind totally ignored it.
(NB: To those who, following the above revelations by the whistleblower, concluded that British politicians are clueless as to what the UK security services are up-to - I say: think again!).
Guardian: "The ISC has been criticised in the past for being toothless, and now has some beefed-up powers. But for a body that has only one general investigator, a former police officer, its task of overseeing MI5, MI6 and GCHQ is huge."
(NB: My view: plenty for a body that is clearly, just a front: section 10(1) of the Intelligence Services Act 1994 defines its role as: "to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of- (a) the Security Service; (b) the Intelligence Service; (c) GCHQ".
Hence, while this and previous government were denying to all and sundry, including in Parliament, the existence of a superdatabase - the ISC knew that GCHQ had spent hundreds of millions / £1bn+? on such a database).
(Note that Rifkind was a Foreign Secretary (under John Major) - thereby putting him, as some media reported: "too close to the agencies").
(1)- In relation to the British state - what it is doing against me is unlawful under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA). (There is probably something else in relation to the security services -that is equally ignored; this is ''Stasi', Orwellian Surveillance Britain'!)
Extracts from the Act are contained under Definitions (and more comprehensive extracts are contained, in this document, I compiled).
I highlight that, at the Pre-action stage (QB # 2(3), before I filed my 19.04.11 Claim against Her Majesty's then Home Secretary, Theresa May (QB # 6),...
...in its 07.04.11 letter (in reply to mine of 17.03.11 and 29.03.11 - in which I reported the 'surveillance', including the use of plants, as well as interference with ALL my means of communication, and the bugging of my apartment),...
... the Home Office stated that "what [I] report requires authorisation under RIPA". It also referred to "the requirements for authorisation".
Under RIPA, section 28, "the grounds for Directed surveillance" are:
- (a) “in the interests of national security”; (A)
- (b) “for the prevention or detection of crime or prevention of disorder”; (B)
- (c) “to safeguard the economic well-being of the United Kingdom”;
- (e) “to protect public health”;
- (f) “for the assessment and collection of taxes…”; or
- (g) “for any purpose (not falling within paragraphs (a) to (f)) specified by an order from the Secretary of State”
(A) “National security”` is not defined in RIPA. The Interception of Communications Commissioner’s definition is: “[activities] which threaten the safety or well-being of the State, and which are intended to undermine or overthrow Parliamentary democracy by political, industrial or violent means”.
(B) Under s.81(3) “serious crime” is defined as:
- (a) "an offence that would lead to imprisonment for a term of three years or more";
- (b) "conduct involving the use of violence, or resulting in substantial financial gain, or conduct by a large number of persons in pursuit of a common purpose".
(This document contains comprehensive extracts).
As is blatantly obvious, NONE of the above applies to me - (as I most vehemently stressed in my 19.04.11 Claim against the then Home Secretary, Theresa May (QB # 6) - and subsequently in my 19.07.11 Witness Statement (QB # 6(1)).
Using William Hague's definition, above, the fact that the British state does that against me, means that it has - unbelievably - categorised 'ME' as: "a would be terrorist or at the centre of a criminal network or of a foreign intelligence agency trying to spy on Britain" = psycho territory... big time! They are insane.
Can you also believe that the psychos at Her Majesty's Kensington - Notting police reported me to the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA)! (YES: the same SOCA that classifies the criminal activities of big businesses as "secret" and, of course, failed to act on them).
In fact, Her Majesty's then Met Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson - under a statement of truth (QB # 4(2)) - 'justified' the processing of his packs of lies so-called "crime reports" against me - "for the prevention and detection of crime" and "for the apprehension or prosecution of offenders" (police # 3 KP(9)).
(As is blatantly, glaringly obvious, those who should be under surveillance are Andrew David Ladsky and his gang racketeers - because of (b) "detection of crime".
In fact, as, since 2002, I have exposed their crimes endlessly to (among many others) the police and the courts, in numerous documents, supported by a mountain of black-on-white evidence (in addition to this website, they so eagerly "look at" and monitor, to the extent of "counting the number of words") - under s.81(3), THEY should be in jail - together with many of those who help / helped them.
But, while others end-up with prison sentences of up to 32 months for doing similar things, on a much smaller, these racketeers are given a 'Go-past-jail' card - and 'Continue on your merry way').
(NB: Meanwhile, Her Majesty's masonic police and judiciary put a man in jail "for stealing a gingerbread man" - from a shop that had been looted).
It is absolutely undeniable that what is taking place:
(1)- is NOT 'surveillance' according to the rule of law - but persecution;
(2)- that it is carried out with the only possible objective of aiding and abetting organized crime - with approval at high level within the state (My Diary 2.6).
Considering that the hounding and persecution by the British state have been taking place since at least 2005: under sub-section "(g)", what kind of orders in their warrants have Her Majesty's Home Secretaries...
One that modifies sub-section "(c)" by making it read: "to inflict punishment for daring to interfere with 'Establishment'-controlled organized crime activities" ...and communicating it through 'memorandums of understanding'?...in Orwellian Surveillance Britain - clearly operating under the Stasi model.
(NB: Note also the case of the whistleblower Osita Mba who was hunted by HM Revenue & Customs under the same anti-terrorist legislation for 'daring' to report a secret multi-million £s "sweetheart" tax deal HMRC made with Goldman Sachs).
Hence, re. the Home Office's comment on the 2nd page of its 07.04.11 letter (Introduction, above):
"...or to consider whether something else could be the cause of what you are experiencing"
to that I reply that "something else" are psycho, corrupt, amoral Freemasons (criminal psychological harassment) - and conclude that 'I' should be the one who "speaks to social services" to report them as "suffering from [very serious] mental issues".
(4.3)- The British state also - unlawfully - monitors, as well as interferes with ALL my means of communication, as well as bugs / ensures the bugging of my apartment (# 3, above)
MY MEANS OF COMMUNICATION
In relation to the monitoring and interference with ALL my (above) means of communication: phones, post and e-mails...
... - under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (RIPA), "the grounds for Interception" are covered essentially under section 5.
"The grounds for issuing a warrant" are: it must be “necessary” and “proportionate” "to what is sought to be achieved by that conduct"`. s.5(3) lists the grounds as:
- (a) "in the interests of national security";
- (c) "to safeguard the economic well-being of the United Kingdom"; or
- (d) "to give effect to an international mutual assistance agreement in circumstances equivalent to those falling within (b)".
Under RIPA a warrant for interception must be issued by Her Majesty's Home Secretary. Under Definitions, see extracts from section 8 of RIPA that defines the 'contents of warrants'. (Comprehensive extracts are also contained in this document).
Under section 9:
"interception warrants are valid for ONLY 6 months" (s.9(6)(ab) and b);
"they CANNOT be renewed unless the Home Secretary believes that the warrant continues to be necessary on grounds falling within s.5(3)" (above)
However, as the British state is also:
...it follows that it is doing this under the Intelligence Services Act 1994 (see Definitions for extracts). Indeed:
under s.3(1)(a), GCHQ has the right "to monitor or interfere" with electronic communications.
As reported, above, by William Hague: "To intercept the content of any individual's communications in the UK requires a warrant signed personally by me, the home secretary, or by another secretary of state."
s.5 of the Act deals with 'warrants'. It states that " in considering an application, the Secretary of State must think that it is necessary for the action to be taken"
(NB: Note William Hague's statement: "Warrants are legally required to be necessary, proportionate and carefully targeted, and we judge them on that basis")
s.5(3B) defines "the conduct" justifying granting a warrant as:
- (a) "it involves the use of violence, results in substantial financial gain or is conduct by a large number of persons in pursuit of a common purpose; or
- (b) offence for which a person could reasonably be expected to be sentenced to imprisonment for a term of 3 or more years"
(Hence, same as for RIPA's s.81(3) “serious crime”, above)
(NOTE that the phone companies have staff on the Home Office's payroll).
In the light of the above: WHY have Her Majesty's current and past secretaries of state been signing the warrants to have ALL my (above) means of communications: phones, post and e-mails monitored and interfered with?
HOME SECRETARIES - see above list
How can they possibly justify signing the warrants i.e. "think that they are necessary"?
It is blatantly, glaringly obvious that none of the above applies to me.
How dare they impute on me the actions defined by the Acts?
Their only possible objective for doing this is to aid and abet organized crime.
I repeat my above comments (in relation to 'directed surveillance')...
...and add that, any human being with decency and integrity - would view their action as insane. YES: they have definitely more than "lost the plot!".
(Of note: While William Hague inflicted this barbaric psychological "violence" on me - a woman - who is the glaringly obvious victim of crime (Case summary) - at a conference in Jun 14, he proclaimed his support to "the end of sexual violence in conflict zones")
In the light of (among other), the above - consider William Hague's claims that:
- And his claim that "Intelligence-gathering in this country is governed by a very strong legal framework so that we get the balance right between the liberties and privacy of people and the security of the country" (!!!)
Mythomaniacs, who ask their army of speech writers to feed them lines and speeches that sound 'ever so good'...
... = typically treating 'the little people' as though we are mentally retarded - to the extent of being unable to see that we are being fed LIES, upon LIES, upon LIES.
Come on! They know that we know - because many, have, like me, been at the receiving end of their unlawful, criminal, evil, and extremely cruel, vicious, sadistic, life-destroying treatment.
PHONES - POST - E-MAILS
OBJECTIVES (in addition to other forms of harassment and persecution)
Intercept ONLY items that:
1. Will cause distress, torment, anxiety, feeling of persecution, maximum inconvenience.
2. Could be used against Kensington / Chelsea / Notting Hill police and/or related parties, including its friends.
3. Will help surveillance, including identification of contacts, covering also e-mail contacts.
In addition re. mobile phones – inflict further distress, anxiety, torment, feeling of persecution and humiliation – by:
4. Sending bogus text and leaving snapping sound message.
5. Blocking for as many months as possible a request for transfer to another network.
6. Cutting service for several weeks.
7. Report events immediately, so that we can inflict further persecution and retribution.
Psychopath, English 'Stasi'
In relation to the bugging of my apartment(# 3.5, above), legislation defines this action as 'Intrusive covert surveillance'.
There are at least 2 Acts under which intrusive surveillance can 'officially' be carried out. (There is probably something else in relation to the security services; this is 'Stasi', Orwellian Surveillance Britain'!):
(1) REGULATION OF INVESTIGATORY POWERS ACT 2000 (RIPA)
In addition to the police, RIPA permits many other public bodies (extracts of Schedule 1, on pg 21 of this document) to undertake intrusive surveillance.
Section 32(3) of RIPA, states that "the grounds for justification" are:
- (a) “in the interest of national security”;
- (b) “for the prevention or detection of serious crime”;
- (c) “in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom”.
and s.32(4): “The matters to be taken into account in considering whether the requirements of subsection (2) are satisfied in the case of any authorisation shall include whether the information which it is thought necessary to obtain by the authorised conduct could reasonably be obtained by other means”.
(2) Police Act 1997 (extracts also in this document)
- Section 92 states "that to carry out surveillance of private premises by means of wireless telegraphy the police requires an authorisation".
- s.93(2) relates to the grounds, stating that "the Met Commissioner can grant such authorisation and must believe that (a) "the action is necessary because it will be of substantial value in the prevention or detection of 'serious crime'" and (b) that the action is “proportionate” "to what the action seeks to achieve".
This Act has come to be referred to as the 'bug and burgle' powers of the police - and leaves the door wide open to abuse (something the English police is expert at).
(1) In relation to the packs of lies so-called "crime reports" the police is processing against me (and circulating widely) - look at my experience with:
(2) In relation to my 2 well-documented complaints of glaringly obvious harassment and hounding, by 2 men, to Her Majesty's Kensington & Chelsea police, in Oct 10.
Not only did it refuse repeatedly to deal with my complaints, following filing my claim against the Met Commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson - under a statement of truth - he denied what I reported being told by the police at the time (police # 6). I was able to substantiate my claims with irrebutable evidence, as I had recorded the said conversation of 16 Oct 10 (Overview # 17).
(3) The outcome of the 19.04.11 Claim I filed against Theresa May, then Home Secretary (QB # 6), in the context of which, I captured numerous 'surveillance' events (above: # 2 and # 3), in my 19.07.11 Home Office Witness Statement (QB # 6(1) ; Overview # 18(2)(3)) .
Indeed, as I explain under QB # 6(1), I submit that I have no protection whatsoever against the blatant abuse of power by the state (assessment confirmed in subsequent media articles).
In addition, as my experience with the European Court of Human Rights, (summarised under Overview # 18(3) to # 18(5)), demonstrates - 'the Defender of Human Rights' refused to defend my rights.
In breach of Article 45 of the European Convention, one judge, Vincent A De Gaetano (Malta) rejected my legitimate Application.
This illegal rejection was subsequently endorsed higher up (ECt # 2 , ECt # 2.1 , ECt # 4).
What happened? At the time of my Application, the ECtHR was under British mandate, headed by Sir Nicolas Bratza (ECtHR # 2.1).
= Bratza found a very compliant, corrupt judge from a little island, prepared to breach the Convention in order to reject my legitimate Application.
(Note that this court approves of Freemasonry).
|OUTCOME: The British state, operating in tandem with Andrew David Ladsky - has 'carte blanche' to continue inflicting on me its - unlawful / illegal - highly abusive, life-destroying treatment.
The taxpayer picks-up the tab!
(6)- The instigators of the above - unlawful - persecution: 'the Brotherhood' i.e. Freemasons - and what they have - and continue - to do it for.
WHAT DRIVING FORCE can lead the following - since 2002 (CASE SUMMARY ; RÉSUMÉ DE MON CAS) - to act like a private army of henchmen - very actively assisting the thoroughly evil, vampiric, extremely cruel, vicious, sadistic, Rachman Andrew David Ladsky and,...
...concurrently, his gang of racketeers in their criminal activities, ongoing persecution against me - their glaringly obvious victim - including keeping him in the loop on everything I do...
...- as well as actively protect him and his gang from the legal consequences - while others, doing similar things, on a much smaller scale, have ended with prison sentences of up to 32 months:
Her Majesty's Judiciaries (media reports that most are Masons) (some court staff) and Ministerial Heads (snapshots: some under # 1(4), above; under Kangaroo courts - and concurrently: Extortion ; 'Advisors to Jefferson House': CKFT, Portner and Jaskel, MRJ):
Her Majesty's tribunal Panel, Clerks, tribunal Head and Ministerial Head (snapshots: (snapshots: some under # 1(4), above; also under: summaries of my complaints # 1.1 ; Kangaroo courts - and concurrently: Extortion ; 'Advisors to Jefferson House': CKFT, MRJ and Brian Gale):
Her Majesty's police (media report that it has its own Masonic lodge), related services, and Ministerial Heads
(Snapshots: some under # 1(4), above; breach: Data Protection Act 1998, Defamation Act ; violations of European Convention rights: Article 2 , Article 3 , Article 8 , Article 10 , Article 14 - BUT can be argued against as the Act excludes 2 critical articles) - and concurrently: Extortion, Kangaroo courts)
- Chief Superintendents: (1)- Mark Heath; (2)- CS Jason Gwillim; (3)- Alistair Ferguson; (4)- Adrian Roberts; (5)- Ellie O'Connor;...
- Police, GCHQ and Security services - since at least 2005 (as detailed, above, under # 2 and # 3, and snapshots, above, under # 1(4)(7) , # 1(4)(9) , # 1(4)(10) , # 1(4)(11) , # 1(4)(12) , # 1(4)(13) ; Overview # 19);
Her Majesty's Foreign Secretaries
Since 2005 (see above): Jack Straw ; Margaret Beckett ; David Miliband ; William Hague ; Philip Hammond - and ongoing; (snapshots: above, under # 1(4)(6) ; Overview # 19)
Lawyers and their 'regulators'
(e.g. the Law Society has a 'Memorandum of Understanding' with the police) (concurrently, consider snapshot under Extortion):
- McGrigors, solicitors used by KPMG to look at my website (KPMG # 3.4);
Surveyors and their 'regulator' (with 100% support from successive governments):
- (3)- Tom O'Kane, RICS Assoc.; (4)- Jon Wolbrom MRIPM; (5)- Gavin Putney AIRPM; (6)- Stuart G Burchell AIRPM;...
- (7)- Alex Brooks; (8)- Petra Connolly; (9)- Sasha Scrckova; (10)- Sasha Vrba
(For a definition of the acronyms they are all so found to add after their names - see my assessment of Martyn Gerrard 'professional' memberships and awards).
Others who have turned a blind eye to the misconduct, the malpractice - and have provided a helping hand:
Looking at my experience, since 2002, with the above parties (Case summary) - the glaringly obvious answer to my above question IS:
the clandestine Freemasons, 'the Brotherhood'...
...- of which the thoroughly evil, greed-ridden, vampiric, extremely cruel, vicious, sadistic, claim to be "Jewish", Rachman Andrew David Ladsky...
... - described obligingly by Her Majesty's Kensington & Notting Hill police in its packs of lies so-called "crime reports" it holds against me, as:
... - has to be one of them.
Hence, I submit the position in the Venn diagram to be where criminal 'Jewish' property mafia - a sizeable and notorious group (e.g. the gang I am facing since 2002) in the residential leasehold sector - overlaps with the Masonic network.
(NB: Other people pursuing their battles also refer to / conclude involvement by Masons e.g. www.standyourground.co.uk, blog by a visitor to my site. I suspect that Freemasonry is also the force behind some of the victims' cases reported on the Victims Unite website, as well as other cases flagged-up as a result of the 'Stop the Oppression of the British People' petition).
(Several years after writing my above conclusions, Jan 14 articles from the Independent newspaper (on the media pg) endorsed them).
Although Freemasonry in this country is highly secretive (unlike e.g. in France where there is 'some' openness e.g. article in Le Point, issue No 1897, 22 Jan 09, "Francs-Maçons - Le Grand Retour"), the profile of members is common knowledge:
- members of Parliament and House of Lords;
- members of the professions: accountants, lawyers, surveyors, financial advisers, etc., captains of industry, etc.
(*) In its below 9 Mar 08 article, "Freemasons open a new branch...at Buckingham Palace", the Daily Mail reported:
"...the Queen's cousin, the Duke of Kent, is head of the organisation as Grand Master of the United Lodge of England".
The 10 Jan 14 Indy article reported:
"In England and Wales, the Grand Master of the Freemasons is Prince Edward, Duke of Kent".
This is repeated in the next article.
"Secret Archive shows extent of freemasonry in Britain", Telegraph, 23 Nov 15"
"Records, from 1733 to 1923, of the names of two million freemasons has been published online by the genealogy service, Ancestry.
The list contains the names of royalty, statesmen and thousands of other influential figures including: 5,500 police officers of different varieties, thousands more military figures, 170 judges, 169 MPs, 16 bishops."
"The United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) has around 250,000 members [*] and The Grand Lodges of Scotland and Ireland administer some 150,000 members. There may be as many as six million globally – two million in the United States."
Below the Masons are their flunkeys and henchmen, with their layers upon layers of stooges and henchmen.
With such a gigantic and totally uncontrolled, clandestine, 'above the law' (they represent 'the law': judiciary, police) octopus with very far-reaching tentacles, the likelihood for somebody in my position and, in particular, with my profile, is that...
– as demonstrated by my experience with the above (Case summary ; Résumé de mon cas), and under My Diary # 2.4: e.g. Overall outcome to date; criminal psychological harassment...
... - wherever you turn to for help, you will end-up facing a Mason / somebody controlled by Masons, or who will end-up being controlled by Masons / their flunkeys / stooges / henchmen because:
A few years ago, Her Majesty The Queen was reported in the media to have said to Princess Diana's butler that "There are dark forces operating in this country...".
I concluded she was referring to masonry - and that she should know, as she heads the majority of the institutions in which the thoroughly evil, utterly amoral and corrupt masons I have - and continue to face - operate.
This truly abhorrent, barbaric, tyrannical, extremely sickening conduct towards me by the henchmen of the utterly amoral, evil, vampiric, extremely vicious, cruel and sadistic Rachman Andrew David Ladsky and his gang of racketeers - as reported on this page, in the Overview, and many other parts of this website - certainly endorses the saying:
"Birds of a feather, flock together"
BBC2’s Newsnight – c. Summer 2011 - In the context of the phone hacking scandal, Simon Hughes, senior LibDem, said on one of the BBC2’s Newsnight programmes that “the challenge in setting-up an inquiry would be to find a judge who is not a Mason”.
The Telegraph, 5 Nov 09 article - “Judges no longer have to declare Freemasonry"
"Since 1998, those becoming judges or magistrates have been required to say if they are a Mason after the then Home Secretary – Mr Straw – said membership of “secret societies such as freemasonry” could raise suspicions of impartiality and objectivity”.
"But, now Justice Secretary, Mr Straw has abandoned the requirement after the United Grand Lodge of England threatened legal action following a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights.
In 2007, the court ruled in favour of Italian Masons that making an official declare their membership breached their rights to free association and was discriminatory.
Mr Straw yesterday and that it would be “disproportionate” to continue with the practice”...
...said a review had shown no evidence of “impropriety or malpractice” as a result of a judge being a Freemason"
[NB: Considering my evidence = another TYPICAL British state's 'review'].
The Telegraph, 20 Aug 11, “Freemasons in the police leading the attack on David Cameron’s riot response”
“Leading police officers have set up a national Masonic lodge (*) …named “Sine Favore”, after the Latin motto of the Police Federation, “Without Fear, Without Favour”.
Lodge number 9856 was officially opened by a senior Masonic official, Russell Race.
He is the Metropolitan Grand Master, head of the Grand Lodge of London, a corporate financier and chairman of a construction firm behind the huge Westfield shopping centre in west London..."
"The lodge is based at 10 Duke Street in central London, which is also the headquarters of the Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree, one of the most important and mysterious bodies in international Masonic circles, which has an elite membership of only 75 people.
The founding members of “Sine Favore” include senior officials from the Police Federation, the police staff association, which is currently fighting the Government over its plans to cut budgets".
"The new Masonic lodge is led by... a Metropolitan Police officer… Other founder members include officers from the Metropolitan Police…, a personal injury lawyer who specialises... in “road traffic accidents and public liability cases for both private clients and associations including the Police Federation”.
Membership is open to all serving and retired officers across Britain and others working alongside the police, including lawyers, criminologists and even the financial advisers who managed ‘officers’ retirement plans.
Masonic rules require members to do all they can to support each other, to look after each other and to keep each others’ lawful secrets....Critics argue this could put them at odds with discharging their duty to serve the public.
The “Sine Favore” Lodge was opened despite the conclusions of a Parliamentary inquiry which warned of public fears that “Freemasonry can have an unhealthy influence on the criminal justice system”..."
"The Police Federation refused to discuss whether any of its officials had disclosed their involvement with Freemasonry.
A spokesman said: “Being a member of any organisation is a matter for the individual, so long as membership of that organisation does not compromise their duties and responsibilities as a police officer”".
[NB: WHO decides on that? 'The Brothers!' - using the yardstick of whether or not it meets their personal interests].
(*) The police has included Masons for decades e.g. Operation Countryman in the 60s.
Daily Mail, 9 May 08 - "Freemasons open a new branch...at Buckingham Palace", stating, among other that
"...it is being formed by members of the Royal Household and police who protect the Royal Family.... The Palace has no power to halt the formation of the lodge...
the Queen's cousin, the Duke of Kent, is head of the organisation as Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge of England (*)...
...a spokesman for the Queen said "Buckingham Palace has not, and would not, endorse this sort of arrangement. No permission has been given by the Palace for a Buckingham Palace lodge or anything similar" ... It is also likely to cause consternation among career women in the Palace, as it is a men-only organisation."
"Masons are widely believed to further the business and professional interests of brother Masons, although they would deny this and claim it is a harmless social and charitable organisation" [NB: Why the need for secrecy then?].
The article also states that the lodge was due to be "consecrated on 19 May 2008"
(*) Her Majesty The Queen and other royals have far more control over the country than 'the little people' are led to believe - see My Diary # 2.6
Back to top